OBJECTIVES: Guidance to industry from the FDA requires studies to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of novel type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications. Although the objectives of such cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) are similar, differences in features such as enrollment criteria present a challenge when trying to assess the applicability of these studies to real-world T2D populations. This study evaluated the proportions of US adults with T2D who met the eligibility criteria for each of the 4 sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor CVOTs. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and published patient eligibility criteria for completed or ongoing SGLT2 inhibitor CVOTs. METHODS: Data on T2D diagnosis and other relevant clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted from the NHANES (2009-2010 and 2011-2012). Weighted analysis of these data was used to estimate the percentage of US adults with T2D who met the eligibility criteria for the CANVAS program (CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study) (canagliflozin; NCT01032629, NCT01989754), and the DECLARE-TIMI 58 (dapagliflozin; NCT01730534), EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin; NCT01131676), and VERTIS-CV (ertugliflozin; NCT01986881) trials. RESULTS: The weighted analysis identified a population of 23,941,512 US adults from data on key inclusion criteria and information indicating a diagnosis of T2D. Of these, 4.1% met the criteria for EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 4.8% for VERTIS-CV, 8.8% for the CANVAS program, and 39.8% for the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were considerable differences in the proportions of US adults with T2D who met the eligibility criteria for these studies.The DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial criteria were the most generalizable to the US T2D population.
OBJECTIVES: Guidance to industry from the FDA requires studies to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of novel type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications. Although the objectives of such cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) are similar, differences in features such as enrollment criteria present a challenge when trying to assess the applicability of these studies to real-world T2D populations. This study evaluated the proportions of US adults with T2D who met the eligibility criteria for each of the 4 sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor CVOTs. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and published patient eligibility criteria for completed or ongoing SGLT2 inhibitor CVOTs. METHODS: Data on T2D diagnosis and other relevant clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted from the NHANES (2009-2010 and 2011-2012). Weighted analysis of these data was used to estimate the percentage of US adults with T2D who met the eligibility criteria for the CANVAS program (CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study) (canagliflozin; NCT01032629, NCT01989754), and the DECLARE-TIMI 58 (dapagliflozin; NCT01730534), EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin; NCT01131676), and VERTIS-CV (ertugliflozin; NCT01986881) trials. RESULTS: The weighted analysis identified a population of 23,941,512 US adults from data on key inclusion criteria and information indicating a diagnosis of T2D. Of these, 4.1% met the criteria for EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 4.8% for VERTIS-CV, 8.8% for the CANVAS program, and 39.8% for the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were considerable differences in the proportions of US adults with T2D who met the eligibility criteria for these studies.The DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial criteria were the most generalizable to the US T2D population.
Authors: Kåre I Birkeland; Johan Bodegard; Anna Norhammar; Josephina G Kuiper; Elena Georgiado; Wendy L Beekman-Hendriks; Marcus Thuresson; Marc Pignot; Ron M C Herings; Adriaan Kooy Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Stéphane Pintat; Peter Fenici; Niklas Hammar; Linong Ji; Kamlesh Khunti; Jesús Medina; Fengming Tang; Eric Wittbrodt; Filip Surmont Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2019-03-21
Authors: Phil McEwan; Angharad R Morgan; Rebecca Boyce; Klas Bergenheim; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Peter A Johansson; Ofri Mosenzon; Avivit Cahn; John P H Wilding Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Lisanne C A Smidt; Frank L J Visseren; Wendela L de Ranitz-Greven; Hendrik M Nathoe; L Jaap Kappelle; Gert J de Borst; Harold W de Valk; Jan Westerink Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2021-09-08 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Shih-Chieh Shao; Yi-Han Lin; Kai-Cheng Chang; Yuk-Ying Chan; Ming-Jui Hung; Yea-Huei Kao Yang; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2019-12