Literature DB >> 29693215

How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Marie Luise Schreiter1, Witold X Chmielewski2, Christian Beste2,3.   

Abstract

The goal-directed control of behaviour critically depends on emotional regulation and constitutes the basis of mental well-being and social interactions. Within a socioemotional setting, it is necessary to prioritize effectively the relevant emotional information over interfering irrelevant emotional information to orchestrate cognitive resources and achieve appropriate behavior. Currently, it is elusive whether and how different socioemotional stimulus dimensions modulate cognitive control and conflict resolution. Theoretical considerations suggest that interference effects are less detrimental when conflicting emotional information is presented within a "positive socioemotional setting" compared with a "negative socioemotional setting." Using event-related potentials (ERPs) and source localization methods, we examined the basic system neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical structures associated with interactive effects of different interfering facial, socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution. We account for interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution, i.e., we show how the socioemotional valence modulates cognitive control (conflict processing). The data show that conflicts are stronger and more difficult to resolve in a negative emotional task-relevant setting than in a positive emotional task-relevant setting, where incongruent information barely induced conflicts. The degree of emotional conflict critically depends on the contextual emotional valence (positive or negative) in which this conflict occurs. The neurophysiological data show that these modulations were only reflected by late-stage conflict resolution processes associated with the middle (MFG) and superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Attentional selection processes and early-stage conflict monitoring do not seem to be modulated by interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution.

Keywords:  Conflict processing; EEG; Emotions; Faces; Source localization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29693215     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0585-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  79 in total

1.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.

Authors:  M P Milham; M T Banich; A Webb; V Barad; N J Cohen; T Wszalek; A F Kramer
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-12

2.  Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks.

Authors:  Robert West
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Interacting sources of interference during sensorimotor integration processes.

Authors:  Moritz Mückschel; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Gabriel Dippel; Witold Chmielewski; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural correlates of conflict processing.

Authors:  Robert West; Kristin Jakubek; Nicholas Wymbs; Michele Perry; Kara Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala.

Authors:  Amit Etkin; Tobias Egner; Daniel M Peraza; Eric R Kandel; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Beyond fear: rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Tobias Brosch; David Sander; Gilles Pourtois; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

Review 7.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; L Anllo-Vento
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  ADHD patients fail to maintain task goals in face of subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts.

Authors:  K Gohil; A Bluschke; V Roessner; A-K Stock; C Beste
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Variations in the TNF-α gene (TNF-α -308G→A) affect attention and action selection mechanisms in a dissociated fashion.

Authors:  Christian Beste; Bernhard T Baune; Michael Falkenstein; Carsten Konrad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  On the influence of emotion on conflict processing.

Authors:  Philipp Kanske
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  How the depth of processing modulates emotional interference - evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.

Authors:  Marie Luise Schreiter; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Tjalf Ziemssen; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Pushing to the Limits: What Processes during Cognitive Control are Enhanced by Reaction-Time Feedback?

Authors:  Astrid Prochnow; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-04-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.