Literature DB >> 29693048

Fever and indurated subcutaneous plaques.

Yee Leng Teoh1, Suruchi Vohra1, Yong-Kwang Tay1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPS, hemophagocytic syndrome; PAN, polyarteritis nodosa; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SPTCL, subcutaneous panniculitislike T-cell lymphoma; hemophagocytic syndrome; subcutaneous panniculitislike T-cell lymphoma

Year:  2018        PMID: 29693048      PMCID: PMC5911979          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2017.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAAD Case Rep        ISSN: 2352-5126


× No keyword cloud information.
A 21-year-old Chinese woman presented with a 1-week history of high fever, myalgia, and a 2-month history of firm lumps. Examination found 2 large nontender erythematous indurated subcutaneous plaques with central atrophy on the left arm (Fig 1) and right buttock. There was no ulceration, Raynaud's phenomenon, or livedo reticularis.
Fig 1
Investigations found leukopenia of 1.36 × 109/L (4.0-10.0 × 109/L), hemoglobin 10.8 g/dL (13.0-17.0 g/dL), elevated alanine transaminase of 144 U/L (10-55 U/L), and aspartate transaminase of 205 U/L (10-45 U/L). Blood cultures, HIV results, and viral hepatitis serology results were negative. A biopsy specimen was taken from her arm plaque (Figs 2 and 3).
Fig 2
Fig 3
Question 1: What is the most likely diagnosis? Lupus profundus Subcutaneous panniculitislike T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) Erythema nodosum Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) Erythema induratum Answers: Lupus profundus – Incorrect. Lupus profundus is more common in women and presents as subcutaneous nodules on arms, shoulders, buttocks, and face. It occurs in 2% to 5% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Conversely, 10% to 15% of patients with lupus panniculitis have SLE. Histopathology findings show lobular lymphocytic panniculitis with epidermal and dermal changes of lupus, such as thickened basement membrane, interface changes, and superficial and deep, perivascular, periadnexal, lymphocytic inflammation with increased dermal mucin. In less than half of the cases, biopsy findings show lobular lymphocytic panniculitis without epidermal and dermal lupus changes. There are increased plasma cells and B-cell aggregates, and are less likely to have Ki-67/MIB-1–positive T cells or monoclonal TCR gene rearrangement compared with SPTCL. SPTCL – Correct. The infiltration of fat lobules by large lymphocytes with hyperchromatic irregular nuclei rimming the adipocytes with fat necrosis is consistent with a diagnosis of SPTCL. The World Health Organization criteria classify SPTCL to cases expressing αβ T-cell receptor, commonly CD8+, with solely subcutis involvement, which often runs an indolent course. Primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma is commonly CD4−, CD8-, CD56+, with infiltration into epidermis and dermis and portends a poor prognosis. Approximately 19% of SPTCL patients also have autoimmune disorders including SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, and Sjögren disease. Erythema nodosum – Incorrect. There are tender erythematous subcutaneous nodules on the lower legs. PAN – Incorrect. Livedo reticularis, Raynaud phenomenon, subcutaneous nodules, and ulceration often occur on legs. Erythema induratum – Incorrect. It presents with tender nodules on calves, which may ulcerate, with septal and lobular granulomatous panniculitis and neutrophilic vasculitis on histology. Question 2: What systemic complication may be present in this patient? Miliary tuberculosis Sarcoidosis Systemic PAN Acute SLE Hemophagocytic syndrome Answers: Miliary tuberculosis – Incorrect. Erythema induratum may be an immunologic hypersensitivity reaction to antigenic components of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and has been associated with miliary tuberculosis. However, miliary tuberculosis is unrelated to SPTCL. Sarcoidosis – Incorrect. Sarcoidosis may be associated with erythema nodusum. Systemic PAN – Incorrect. Fever, myalgia, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and bowel and renal ischemia are manifestations, but the histopathology is not consistent with that of PAN. Acute SLE – Incorrect. There is significant overlap of clinical and histologic features in SPTCL and SLE with both conditions often presenting with a constellation of fever, constitutional symptoms, hepatitis, cytopenia, similar cutaneous manifestations, and associated autoimmune disorders. However, the skin biopsy result is not consistent with that of lupus panniculitis. Hemophagocytic syndrome – Correct. Approximately 15% of SPTCL cases have underlying systemic involvement or hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS). These patients have a reduced 5-year overall survival rate of 46% compared with 80% in patients without HPS. HPS is diagnosed by at least 5 features including fever greater than 38.5°C; splenomegaly; blood cytopenia; hypertriglyceridemia or hypofibrinogenemia; hemophagocytosis in the bone marrow, spleen, lymph nodes, or liver; low natural killer cell activity; elevated ferritin; and elevated soluble CD25 (soluble interleukin-2 receptor α). Bone marrow aspiration is important to detect marrow involvement. Our patient had a constellation of fever, splenomegaly, cytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, high ferritin, and bone marrow involvement, thereby confirming the presence of HPS. For systemic involvement, positron emission tomography-fludeoxyglucose body scan and computerized tomographic scans of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis are useful to characterize the location, size and depth of extracutaneous lesions. Question 3: In addition to the stains shown in Fig 3, which immunohistochemical staining would likely be positive in this patient? CD3 CD20 CD30 CD45 CD56 Answers: CD3 – Correct. CD3, CD43, Ki67, perforin, granzyme B, and TIA1 are positive in SPTCL. It is also commonly CD4− and CD8+ as shown in Fig 3, A. In contrast, lupus panniculitis commonly shows a mixture of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Foci of Ki-67 hotspots within regions of atypical CD8+ T cells was observed in our case (Fig 3, B) and has been reported in SPTCL. The Ki-67 hotspots are not present in lupus panniculitis, which can help distinguish it from SPTCL. CD20 – Incorrect. CD20 is negative in SPTCL. Lupus panniculitis usually has aggregates of CD20+ B cells mixed with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CD30 – Incorrect. CD30 is negative in SPTCL. However, it may be positive in primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma. CD45 – Incorrect. CD45 is negative in SPTCL. CD56 – Incorrect. CD56 positivity is seen in primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma but not SPTCL.
  5 in total

1.  Hidden tuberculous lymphadenitis and miliary tuberculosis in an erythema induratum patient: usefulness of interferon-γ release assays in the diagnosis.

Authors:  Sang Min Yi; Dai Hyun Kim; Sang Wook Son; Il-Hwan Kim; Jae Eun Choi
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.005

Review 2.  Panniculitis. Part II. Mostly lobular panniculitis.

Authors:  L Requena; E Sánchez Yus
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Useful Parameters for Distinguishing Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-Cell Lymphoma From Lupus Erythematosus Panniculitis.

Authors:  Robert E LeBlanc; Mahkam Tavallaee; Youn H Kim; Jinah Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Reactive hemophagocytic syndrome in adults: a retrospective analysis of 162 patients.

Authors:  Sébastien Rivière; Lionel Galicier; Paul Coppo; Christophe Marzac; Cedric Aumont; Olivier Lambotte; Laurence Fardet
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma: definition, classification, and prognostic factors: an EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Group Study of 83 cases.

Authors:  Rein Willemze; Patty M Jansen; Lorenzo Cerroni; Emilio Berti; Marco Santucci; Chalid Assaf; Marijke R Canninga-van Dijk; Agnes Carlotti; Marie-Louise Geerts; Sonja Hahtola; Michael Hummel; Leila Jeskanen; Werner Kempf; Cesare Massone; Pablo L Ortiz-Romero; Marco Paulli; Tony Petrella; Annamari Ranki; José L Rodriguez Peralto; Alistair Robson; Nancy J Senff; Maarten H Vermeer; Janine Wechsler; Sean Whittaker; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 22.113

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.