Literature DB >> 29692911

Comparison of genomes of Coxiella burnetii strains using formal order analysis.

S N Shpynov1, I V Tarasevich1, A A Skiba2, N N Pozdnichenko2, A S Gumenuk2.   

Abstract

The Coxiella burnetii strain NL3262 was isolated during the Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands in 2007-2010. Formal-order analysis (FOA) was used to study the similarity of the genome (chromosome and plasmid) of this strain with the genomes from other strains. Chromosomes from ten C. burnetii strains and eight plasmids were studied with FOA tools such as 'Map of genes' and 'Matrix of similarity.' The 'Map of genes' tool showed that the chromosome of strain C. burnetii str. NL3262 distanced itself by the index of average remoteness (g) of 1.449640 (x-axis) from chromosomes of other strains (g 1.448295-1.448865). The 'Matrix of similarity' was used for an advanced analysis of the obtained results. The complete similarity of the components of chromosomes and plasmids was determined by pairwise comparison and the identification of nucleotides matching with them. A total of 84.90% of the chromosomal components of C. burnetii strain NL3262 coincided completely with the chromosomal components of strain Z3055. For chromosomes of other strains, this percentage varied from 12.06% to 47.14%. The plasmid of strain NL3262 had 50.0% of the components being completely coincident with the components of the plasmid of RSA 331; with RSA 493 it was 29.89%. Thus, C. burnetii str. NL3262 is the closest to str. Z3055 by the similarity of the chromosomal components, but on the index of average remoteness of the chromosome and the similarity of the plasmids' QpH1 components, it is the closest to strain RSA 331.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Average remoteness; Coxiella burnetii; Epidemiology; Formal order analysis; Genome; Internucleotide distance; Q fever; ‘Map of genes’; ‘Matrix of similarity’

Year:  2018        PMID: 29692911      PMCID: PMC5913358          DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Introduction

Q fever is a widespread zoonotic disease caused by Coxiella burnetii [1]. Acute Q fever typically arises from inhalation of aerosolized bacteria [2]. Rare but potentially severe chronic disease most commonly manifests as endocarditis [1], [3], [4], [5]. Goats, sheep and cattle are the primary reservoirs of C. burnetii, but strains have been obtained from a large variety of wild vertebrates and arthropods [1], [6]. In sheep and goats, massive proliferation of the organism in the female reproductive system can result in late-term abortion. Parturition by infected mammals can consequently spread tremendous numbers of C. burnetii into the environment [1]. From 2007 to 2010, the Netherlands has been confronted with the largest global Q fever outbreak ever, involving 4026 human cases. It was shown that the strains responsible for this outbreak, NL3262 and Z3055, are clonal, as they both contain the QpH1 plasmid, have the same MST33 genotype and have the same VNTR profile [7]. The C. burnetii strain NL3262 was isolated from an aborted goat placenta during this outbreak [8]. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis revealed the predominant presence of the so-called CbNL01 genotype, and to a lesser extent the CbNL12 genotype, among the strains isolated in the Netherlands [9]. A recent phylogenetic analysis detected four clades (indicated as 1a, 1b, 2 and 3) among C. burnetii strains [10]: clade 1, CbNL01 genotypes 1a (including NL3262) and 1b; clade 2, CbNL12 genotype and NM-like genotype (NMI, RSA 331, etc.), representing the genome of strain Z3055, which is equidistant from clusters 1 and 2; and clade 3, scurry genotype (plasmid-less strains: CbuG_Q212), with nonclustered strains for each of the different genotypes (Schperling strain, Dugway 5J108-111, CbuK_Q154, MSU Goat Q177, etc.). It is established that C. burnetii strains with different genotypic profiles can infect a variable range of host species with distinct efficiency. CbNL01 genotype strains are predominantly found in goats and in humans, whereas the CbNL12 genotype strains are commonly found in cattle and hardly in goats and humans [9], [11], [12]. This suggests a higher susceptibility of humans and goats to strains from the CbNL01 genotype than to the CbNL12 genotype. A new method, formal order analysis (FOA) [13], was recently proposed to classify representatives of the Rickettsiaceae family [14]. We believe that FOA may be well suited to study the genomic relationships of the NL3262 strain that has caused the Dutch Q fever outbreak with other C. burnetii strains.

Materials and methods

Genome sequences of Coxiella burnetii strains

The genomic sequences used in this study are presented in Table 1. All reference genomes were imported from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). Chromosomes from ten C. burnetii strains (Dugway 5J108-111; CbuK_Q154; Z3055; RSA 493; RSA 439; RSA439 clone 4; CbuG_Q212; RSA 331; NL3262; MSU Goat Q177) and eight plasmids (Dugway 5J108-111 pQpDG; CbuK_Q154 pQpRS; RSA 493 pQpH1; RSA 439 pQpH1; RSA439 clone 4 pQpH1; RSA 331 QpH1; NL3262 QpH1; MSU Goat Q177 pQpRS) were studied.
Table 1

Genome features of sequenced and average remoteness of Coxiella burnetii strains

No.Coxiella burnetii strainsCladeSourceGenBank accession no.Average remoteness (g)Genome size (bp)G+C%Gene countPlasmid
IS110 copy no.
TypeSize (bp)
1NL32621aGoat1.44964073302 093 47742.842401QpH137 320106
2CbRSA3312HumanNC_010117.11.44886534712 016 42742.742272QpH137 31744
3CbuG_Q2123HumanNC_011527.11.44873655842 008 87042.602208integrated28
4NMRSA493 (phase I)2TickNC_002971.41.44859747401 995 28142.642085QpH137 3191
5Z30551/2SheepNZ_LK937696.11.44842463471 995 46342.602197QpH111
6NMRSA 439 (phase II)2Cell cultureNZ_CP020616.11.44842064591 969 22442.642217pQpH137 31920
7NMRSA439 (phase II, clone 4)2HumanNZ_CP018005.11.44840956251 969 24542.642219pQpH137 31920
8MSU Goat Q177aGoatNZ_CP018150.11.44838459272 090 56542.642305QpRS39 28148
9CbuK_Q154aHumanNC_011528.11.44838110702 063 10042.642302QpRS39 28036
10Dugway 5J108-111aRodentsNC_009727.11.44829597212 158 75842.342358QpDG54 1792

Nonclustered strains are different genotypes (clade 4) [10].

Genome features of sequenced and average remoteness of Coxiella burnetii strains Nonclustered strains are different genotypes (clade 4) [10].

FOA tools

FOA was used to analyse the genomes of C. burnetii strains as described previously [13], [14], [15]. The foundations of this approach were developed for the study of symbolic sequences and were successfully applied earlier in the research of linguistic and musical texts [16]. The work uses a high-precision and unambiguous numerical representation of the original arrangement of nucleotides in the sequence. In order to do this, numerical characteristics (average remoteness, depth, etc.) based on intersymbol intervals (internucleotide distance [17], [18]) were developed [13]. Recently FOA has been improved with the new tools ‘Map of genes’ (MG) [19] and ‘Matrix of similarity’ (MS) [20] to permit a more in-depth study of rickettsial genome structure. Pairs of numeric values of order characteristics from studied genomes and their components {} are mapped into pillars of dots on the MG. Components representing individual genomes are placed vertically, and some horizontal lines are formed with similar components in different genomes. The MG tool kit allows one to obtain interactively a detailed description of any component of the genome. Automated identification of similar components is also possible. The MS represents the similarity values for each pair of analysed genomes. Genomic similarity is determined by comparing the order characteristic values from their components. The MS tool kit enables obtain interactively a list of only similar components of any pair of genomes, and when necessary, sliding window of order characteristics for those components can be obtained. The latter enables visualization of element-by-element similarity of genomic components. A comparison of coding and noncoding sequences in genomes of different strains of C. burnetii sp. is possible using the MG, which can also be useful for differentiation of genes with 100% homology from orthologs. The MG tool identifies interstrain differences in genomes belonging to C. burnetii species. The MG tool describes complete genomes and their components in a graphical form. Genomes are placed (classified) according to the index g on the x-axis, and their components (coding and noncoding sequences) are sited by depth index (G) on the y-axis. Sequences that are completely similar by characteristic are 100% homologous. Strains of the same species show a high degree of homology of their components. It is necessary to introduce a criterion (characteristic) for component identification with a degree of homology <100% in order to compare genomes of different species. Using this approach, it is possible to conduct a selective analysis of all components of genomes individually or by grouping them by feature. Each component can be identified (visualized) among all compared organisms by its name in the annotation, which allows checking its presence in each genome. FOA software is available online (http://foarlab.org/).

Results

The application of the MG tool enabled comparison of the sequence organization of the chromosomes from C. burnetii strains according to the index of the average remoteness on the x-axis, ranging from 1.4482959721 for the Dugway 5J108-111 strain to 1.4496407330 for the NL3262 strain (Fig. 1). The analysis of annotated components (coding and noncoding) of chromosomes ranked according to depth index G (y-axis) showed high percentages (more than 80%) of the genomes of the C. burnetii Z3055 and NL3262 strains having complete (100%) nucleotide sequence similarity. One hundred six copies of IS110 family transposases were detected in the chromosome of strain NL3262, versus 11 in strain Z3055, and from 0 (RSA 493) to 48 (MSU Goat Q177) in other studied strains (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Respective positions of Coxiella burnetii strains using ‘Map of genes’ tool with application of average remoteness (x-axis).

Respective positions of Coxiella burnetii strains using ‘Map of genes’ tool with application of average remoteness (x-axis). The MS tool was used for extended analysis. The complete similarity of the components of chromosomes and plasmids was determined by their pairwise comparison. Strain NL3262 exhibited the highest percentage of homologous components (84.88%) with strain Z3055, followed by strains RSA 331 (47.13%), RSA 439 (33.54%), RSA439 clone 4 (33.00%) and RSA 493 (32.22%) (Table 2). Strain RSA 493 had a high percentage of homology with its clones RSA439 phase II clone 4 (86.89%) and C. burnetii RSA 439 phase II (85.56%). However, the percentage of homologous components between strains RSA 439 phase II clone 4 and RSA 439 was even higher, at 98.16%. In contrast, strain Dugway 5J108-111, isolated from the blood of a chisel-toothed kangaroo rat (Dipodomys microps), and strain CbuG_Q212, isolated from a patient with endocarditis and not carrying a plasmid but containing an integrated plasmid in the genome, were the most dissimilar. Strain CbuK_Q154, isolated from a patient with endocarditis, and strain MSU Goat Q177, isolated from a goat, both of which contain a QpRS plasmid, have a high percentage of homologous chromosomic components (76.55%).
Table 2

Homology degree of the chromosomic components of Coxiella burnetii strains using ‘Matrix of similarity’ tool

Strains of C. burnetii | GenBank accession no.Dugway 5J108-111 | NC_009727.1CbuK_Q154 | NC_011528.1‘MSU goat Q177’ | NZ_CP018150.1RSA439 clone 4 NZ_CP018005.1RSA 439 | NZ_CP020616.1Z3055 | NZ_LK937696.1RSA 493 | NC_002971.4CbuG_Q212 | NC_011527.1RSA 331 | NC_010117.1NL3262 | NZ_CP013667.1
Dugway 5J108-111 | NC_009727.1100.00%22.20%18.73%19.98%19.89%17.60%20.44%18.11%18.93%17.15%
CbuK_Q154 | NC_011528.122.20%100.00%76.55%15.45%15.36%14.14%15.73%15.01%14.94%13.66%
‘MSU Goat Q177’ | NZ_CP018150.118.73%76.55%100.00%18.58%18.63%12.12%17.79%13.00%12.91%12.06%
RSA439 clone 4 NZ_CP018005.119.98%15.45%18.58%100.00%98.16%33.95%86.89%18.71%37.33%33.54%
RSA 439 | NZ_CP020616.119.89%15.36%18.63%98.16%100.00%33.49%85.56%18.58%36.84%33.00%
Z3055 | NZ_LK937696.117.60%14.14%12.12%33.95%33.49%100.00%32.87%16.43%46.15%84.90%
RSA 493 | NC_002971.420.44%15.73%17.79%86.89%85.56%32.87%100.00%19.05%36.05%32.24%
CbuG_Q212 | NC_011527.118.11%15.01%13.00%18.71%18.58%16.43%19.05%100.00%17.40%16.00%
RSA 331 | NC_010117.118.93%14.94%12.91%37.33%36.84%46.15%36.05%17.40%100.00%47.14%
NL3262 | NZ_CP013667.117.15%13.66%12.06%33.54%33.00%84.90%32.24%16.00%47.14%100.00%
Homology degree of the chromosomic components of Coxiella burnetii strains using ‘Matrix of similarity’ tool The QpH1 plasmid of strain NL3262 exhibited a 50.0% MS value with that of strain RSA 331 and 29.89% with strain RSA 493. (For the RSA 439 and RSA439 clone 4 strains, it was 29.55% and 28.89, respectively.) With the other strains, values ranged from 5.56% to 6.74% (Table 3). Plasmids QpRS from strains CbuK_Q154 and MSU Goat Q177 had the highest percentage of homologous components (95.75%). Plasmid QpH1 from strain RSA 493 exhibited MS values of 48.35% and 73.12% with those of its clones RSA 439 and RSA439 clone 4, respectively.
Table 3

Homology degree of the plasmidic components of Coxiella burnetii strains using ‘Matrix of similarity’ tool

Strains/plasmid C. burnetii | GenBank accession no.RSA 493 plasmid pQpH1 | NC_004704.2RSA 439 plasmid QpH1 | NZ_CP020617.1RSA439 clone 4 plasmid QpH1 | NZ_CP018005.1NL3262 plasmid QpH1 | NZ_CP013668.1RSA 331 plasmid QpH1 | NC_010115.1CbuK_Q154 plasmid pQpRS_K_Q154 | NC_011526.1MSU goat Q177 plasmid QpRS | NC_010258.1Dugway 5J108-111 plasmid pQpDG | NC_009726.1
RSA 493 plasmid pQpH1 | NC_004704.2100.00%48.35%73.12%29.89%34.48%10.87%10.87%7.21%
RSA 439 plasmid QpH1 | NZ_CP020617.148.35%100.00%76.60%29.55%43.18%8.60%8.60%8.93%
RSA439 clone 4 plasmid QpH1 | NZ_CP018005.173.12%76.60%100.00%28.89%35.56%10.53%10.53%8.77%
NL3262 plasmid QpH1 | NZ_CP013668.129.89%29.55%28.89%100.00%50.00%6.74%6.74%5.56%
RSA 331 plasmid QpH1 | NC_010115.134.48%43.18%35.56%50.00%100.00%8.99%8.99%7.41%
CbuK_Q154 plasmid pQpRS_K_Q154 | NC_011526.110.87%8.60%10.53%6.74%8.99%100.00%95.75%8.85%
MSU Goat Q177 plasmid QpRS | NC_010258.110.87%8.60%10.53%6.74%8.99%95.75%100.00%8.85%
Dugway 5J108-111 plasmid pQpDG | NC_009726.17.21%8.93%8.77%5.56%7.41%8.85%8.85%100.00%
Homology degree of the plasmidic components of Coxiella burnetii strains using ‘Matrix of similarity’ tool

Discussion

The application of the MG analysis showed that the genome from strain NL3262 (g 1.4496407330) with genotypic profile CbNL01 significantly differed from those of other studied strains (g 1.4482959721–1.4488653471) in structure according to the index of average remoteness. This difference may be caused by the highest number of IS110 elements among all genomes (n = 106; Table 1). The closest genome, that of strain CbRSA 331 (g 1.4488653471), had 44 IS110 elements. Sixty-five of the 106 IS110 elements in strain NL3262 strain were 1020 bp in length. Of these, ten had complete homology with 41 IS110 elements from strain RSA 331, and 20 had 100% homology with two IS110 elements from strain Z3055. Sixteen IS110 elements from strain NL3262 with a length of 1095 bp had complete homology with five elements from strain RSA 439 (clone 4) and two from strain RSA 439. It was confirmed that the Z3055 strain (isolated from a sheep aborted placenta in Germany in 1992), based on the g index, actually belongs to the group of clones of strain RSA 493 and was localized between strains RSA 439, RSA439 clone 4 and RSA 493. This was confirmed by the absence of rearrangements in the genomes of strains Z3055 and NMI [10]. Comparative studies of complete genomes of C. burnetii showed rearrangements at 0, 21, 6 and 13 chromosomal locations in NMI compared to strains Z3055, Cbuk_Q154, CbuG_Q212 and Dugway 5J108-111, respectively [21]. A recent analysis also showed genomic rearrangements of strain NL3262 compared to strains Z3055 (21 locations), Cbuk_Q154 (31 locations), CbuG_Q212 (21 locations) and Dugway 5J108-111 (23 locations) [10]. It is considered that a large number of transposons in outbreak strains might have resulted in extensive genome rearrangements in response to environmental challenges, including in the host. Such rearrangements can result in DNA insertions or deletions, generation of polymorphisms or pseudogenes (genes disrupted by IS elements) or modulation of the gene expression by gene order rearrangements favouring its growth and survival in different niches [10], [21], [22], [23], [24]. The application of the MS tool enables establishing that strains NL3262 and Z3055 have the highest percentage (84.8%) of homologous components (genes and noncoding sequences). At the same time, a large proportion of the remaining nonhomologous genomic fragments is explained by the difference in 95 IS110 elements (Table 1). All genomes from other strains differ significantly from those of strains NL3262 (genotype CbNL01: clade 1a) and Z3055 (genotype CbNL01: clade 1b) due to genes containing single nucleotide polymorphisms. At the same time, using the MS tool, it was found that strains Z3055 and RSA 493 have only 32.89% homologous genes (Table 2). The results obtained in this study are confirmed by recently published research data showing that differences between strains Z3055 and the reference NMI (RSA 493) genome are mostly point mutations and insertions or deletions (indels). Nonsynonymous mutations were increased significantly in coding genes for membrane proteins (16/156 vs. 103/1757), ankyrin repeat domains containing proteins (2/9 vs. 117/1904), transcription factors (7/53 vs. 112/1860) and translation proteins (15/144 vs. 109/1655) [7]. The evolution of this strain may have been driven by mutations in critical genes. Possibly the MS index of complete homology is as informative as the index of orthologous genes when comparing chromosomes. This index takes into account point mutations, which are important differences between Z3055 and the reference NMI which consisted of point mutations and insertions or deletions [7]. Thus, it is more probable that strain NL3262 (and others) which caused the Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands in 2007–2010 belongs to the same clone as strain Z3055 because they have a large number of homologous sequences in their genomes. Additionally, a significant reorganization of the genome took place in strain NL3262 (and other strains from the Dutch outbreak) due to a large increase in the number of IS110 elements, which could be the reason for an increase of virulence and/or spread. At the same time, the percentage of genome homology between clones of one strain NMI phase I (RSA 493) (tick) and NM phase II (RSA439 from human) was 86.89%. The percentage of homologous components between the genomes of the clones of NMII RSA 439 and NMII RSA 439 (cell culture) themselves was 98.16%. NMII has the ∼26 kb chromosomal deletion that eliminates several LPS biosynthetic genes and is associated with the production of a severely truncated LPS [25]. This indicates on the one hand the close relationships (high homology of the genomes) between the strains isolated from the goat and the sheep, and on the other hand, this indicates a significant reorganization of the genome during the transition of the strain to phase II. An important aspect of the study of the MS index is the significant difference between NL3262 and another goat strain, MSU Goat Q177, with the percentage of homologous sequences being as low as 12.06%. This indicates the difference in the origin of the two isolates, in contrast to the similarity of the animal and human strains isolated during the outbreak in the Netherlands and strain Z3055 isolated from the sheep in Germany [7], [8]. The increase in synonymic recombinations (compared to strain Z3055) associated with the increase in IS110 may have contributed to the increase in virulence of C. burnetii strains that caused the outbreak in the Netherlands. The increase in the number of IS110 leads to a reorganization of the genome (causing a significant increase in the collinear blocks), which we detected using a gene map with an average remoteness measure. At the same time, the application of the similarity matrix makes it possible to show that the number of homologous sequences in NL3262 and Z3055 significantly exceeds (by 1.8 times or more) those of other of C. burnetii strains. Our classification completely supports the phylogenetic relationships among sequenced C. burnetii genomes based on single nucleotide polymorphism analysis [10] except for the position of a plasmid-less strain (CbuG_Q212), in which the plasmid is integrated in the chromosome. We propose a comprehensive approach based on the application of two FOA tools (MG and MS) developed by our group as an additional tool for analysis of C. burnetii genomes for the purpose of studying the origin of outbreak strains and the epidemiologic significance of different strains.

Conclusions

The C. burnetii strain NL3262 isolated from a goat during the outbreak in the Netherlands is the closest to strain Z3055 isolated from a sheep in Germany according to the similarity of the chromosomal components (MS index). But by the index of average remoteness (g) of the chromosome, as well as the MS index of the QpH1 plasmid, strain NL3262 is closer to strain RSA 331. However, the genetic differences between the chromosomes of the two strains are minimal in comparison with eight other C. burnetii strains. It will be necessary to sequence more strains isolated from different sources, and primarily from humans, in order to elucidate the origin of the strains that caused the massive recent outbreak in the Netherlands.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever.

Authors:  D Raoult; Tj Marrie; Jl Mege
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 2.  Q fever.

Authors:  Neil R Parker; Jennifer H Barralet; Alan Morton Bell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Bacterial pathogenomics.

Authors:  Mark J Pallen; Brendan W Wren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Comparative genomics reveal extensive transposon-mediated genomic plasticity and diversity among potential effector proteins within the genus Coxiella.

Authors:  Paul A Beare; Nathan Unsworth; Masako Andoh; Daniel E Voth; Anders Omsland; Stacey D Gilk; Kelly P Williams; Bruno W Sobral; John J Kupko; Stephen F Porcella; James E Samuel; Robert A Heinzen
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Is the occurrence of some spontaneous mutations directed by environmental challenges?

Authors:  B G Hall
Journal:  New Biol       Date:  1991-08

6.  Approach for classification and taxonomy within family Rickettsiaceae based on the Formal Order Analysis.

Authors:  S Shpynov; N Pozdnichenko; A Gumenuk
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.700

7.  Molecular epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii from ruminants in Q fever outbreak, the Netherlands.

Authors:  Hendrik I J Roest; Robin C Ruuls; Jeroen J H C Tilburg; Marrigje H Nabuurs-Franssen; Corne H W Klaassen; Piet Vellema; René van den Brom; Daan Dercksen; Willem Wouda; Marcel A H Spierenburg; Arco N van der Spek; Rob Buijs; Albert G de Boer; Peter Th J Willemsen; Fred G van Zijderveld
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Epidemic genotype of Coxiella burnetii among goats, sheep, and humans in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jeroen J H C Tilburg; Hendrik-Jan I J Roest; Sylvain Buffet; Marrigje H Nabuurs-Franssen; Alphons M Horrevorts; Didier Raoult; Corné H W Klaassen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Whole-Genome Sequence of Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile RSA439 (Phase II, Clone 4), a Laboratory Workhorse Strain.

Authors:  Jess A Millar; Paul A Beare; Abraham S Moses; Craig A Martens; Robert A Heinzen; Rahul Raghavan
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-06-08

10.  In vitro and in vivo infectious potential of coxiella burnetii: a study on Belgian livestock isolates.

Authors:  Marcella Mori; Samira Boarbi; Patrick Michel; Raïssa Bakinahe; Katleen Rits; Pierre Wattiau; David Fretin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Coxiella burnetii infection with women's febrile spontaneous abortion reported in Algiers.

Authors:  H Ghaoui; I Bitam; K Ait-Oudhia; N Achour; A Saad-Djaballah; F Z Saadnia; S Kedjour; P-E Fournier; D Raoult
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2018-08-11

2.  Proteome-wide analysis of Coxiella burnetii for conserved T-cell epitopes with presentation across multiple host species.

Authors:  Lindsay M W Piel; Codie J Durfee; Stephen N White
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.