| Literature DB >> 29692854 |
Dong Xu1, Yan Lin1, Rudolf Bauer2, Hui-Rong Chen1, Rui-Qi Yang1, Hui-Qin Zou1, Yong-Hong Yan1.
Abstract
The present study investigated the maneuverability and reasonability of sensory analysis, which has been applied in TCM identification for a long time. Ten assessors were trained and generated the human panel to carry out the organoleptic evaluation of twenty-five batches of Sha-Ren samples. Accordingly, samples were scored from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) for sensory attributes. Based on this, samples were divided into three classes: high class (Yang-Chun-Sha from Guang-Dong), moderate class (Yang-Chun-Sha samples from Yun-Nan and Guang-Xi), and low class (Lv-Qiao-Sha from marketplaces). For further background, three instrumental approaches were employed: morphological measurement with three indices (longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, and 100-fruit weight), GC for determination of bornyl acetate contents, and E-nose for aromatic fingerprint. It is demonstrated in the results that GC and E-nose analyses were in great agreement with organoleptic evaluation. It gives insights into further studies on searching better morphological indicators and improving discriminant model of E-nose.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29692854 PMCID: PMC5859854 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4689767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Descriptive statistics via Friedman test of 25 samples by 10 panelists.
|
| Mean | Std. deviation | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam. 1 | 10 | 9.50 | .527 | 9 | 10 |
| Sam. 2 | 10 | 8.90 | .994 | 7 | 10 |
| Sam. 3 | 10 | 9.40 | .699 | 8 | 10 |
| Sam. 4 | 10 | 9.50 | .527 | 9 | 10 |
| Sam. 5 | 10 | 8.10 | .738 | 7 | 9 |
| Sam. 6 | 10 | 9.00 | .943 | 7 | 10 |
| Sam. 7 | 10 | 8.80 | .919 | 8 | 10 |
| Sam. 8 | 10 | 9.10 | .994 | 7 | 10 |
| Sam. 9 | 10 | 5.40 | .843 | 4 | 7 |
| Sam. 10 | 10 | 5.10 | .738 | 4 | 6 |
| Sam. 11 | 10 | 4.30 | .675 | 3 | 5 |
| Sam. 12 | 10 | 5.10 | .876 | 4 | 6 |
| Sam. 13 | 10 | 4.50 | .972 | 3 | 6 |
| Sam. 14 | 10 | 5.00 | 1.054 | 3 | 6 |
| Sam. 15 | 10 | 4.80 | .919 | 3 | 6 |
| Sam. 16 | 10 | 3.80 | .919 | 2 | 5 |
| Sam. 17 | 10 | 2.30 | 1.252 | 0 | 4 |
| Sam. 18 | 10 | 2.50 | .850 | 1 | 4 |
| Sam. 19 | 10 | 2.80 | 1.135 | 0 | 4 |
| Sam. 20 | 10 | 1.60 | .843 | 0 | 3 |
| Sam. 21 | 10 | 1.50 | .707 | 1 | 3 |
| Sam. 22 | 10 | 2.50 | .707 | 1 | 3 |
| Sam. 23 | 10 | 1.30 | .949 | 0 | 3 |
| Sam. 24 | 10 | 1.50 | .972 | 0 | 3 |
| Sam. 25 | 10 | 1.20 | .919 | 0 | 3 |
Cell information of logistic regression analysis with ordinal variables from 25 samples by 10 panelists.
| Frequency | Score | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitats | Species | |||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
| GuangDong | YangChunSha | |||||||||||
| Observed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 32 | 28 | |
| Expected | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 5.000 | 15.000 | 32.000 | 28.000 | |
| Pearson Residual | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| YunNan | YangChunSha | |||||||||||
| Observed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 19 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Expected | .055 | .247 | 1.149 | 4.479 | 11.597 | 17.566 | 14.056 | .850 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
| Pearson Residual | −.235 | −.499 | −1.085 | −1.228 | 1.475 | .425 | −.647 | .164 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| GuangXi | YangChunSha | |||||||||||
| Observed | 2 | 2 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Expected | .471 | 2.036 | 8.077 | 18.863 | 18.222 | 8.972 | 3.215 | .145 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
| Pearson Residual | 2.235 | −.025 | .727 | −.796 | −1.185 | .372 | 1.597 | −.381 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Market | LvQiaoSha | |||||||||||
| Observed | 7 | 21 | 21 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Expected | 8.280 | 19.830 | 20.631 | 8.329 | 2.171 | .583 | .168 | .007 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
| Pearson Residual | −.479 | .321 | .100 | .997 | −1.501 | −.767 | −.411 | −.085 | .000 | .000 | .000 | |
Link function: Logit.
Figure 1HCA vertical icicle diagram responses to samples based on morphological measurements with three indices (LD, TD, and 100 FW).
Experimental results of Sha-Ren samples.
| Batch number | Sample name | Species | Habitats | Score of human panel | Bornyl acetate content | S6-sensor response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 9.5 | 3.82 | 0.04 |
| (2) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 8.9 | 6.64 | 0.04 |
| (3) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 9.4 | 5.68 | 0.04 |
| (4) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 9.5 | 1.74 | 0.04 |
| (5) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 8.1 | 5.03 | 0.04 |
| (6) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 9.0 | 1.52 | 0.04 |
| (7) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 8.8 | 3.66 | 0.04 |
| (8) | GD-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Dong | 9.1 | 1.35 | 0.04 |
| (9) | YN-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Yun-Nan | 5.4 | 0.88 | 0.03 |
| (10) | YN-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Yun-Nan | 5.1 | 1.06 | 0.03 |
| (11) | YN-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Yun-Nan | 4.3 | 0.48 | 0.03 |
| (12) | YN-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Yun-Nan | 5.1 | 3.71 | 0.03 |
| (13) | YN-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Yun-Nan | 4.5 | 4.04 | 0.03 |
| (14) | GX-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Xi | 5.0 | 1.24 | 0.03 |
| (15) | GX-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Xi | 4.8 | 4.31 | 0.03 |
| (16) | GX-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Xi | 3.8 | 0.80 | 0.03 |
| (17) | GX-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Xi | 2.3 | 0.73 | 0.03 |
| (18) | GX-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Xi | 2.5 | 0.71 | 0.04 |
| (19) | GX-YCS | Yang-Chun-Sha | Guang-Xi | 2.8 | 0.69 | 0.03 |
| (20) | M-LQS | Lv-Qiao-Sha | Marketplaces | 1.6 | 0.68 | 0.03 |
| (21) | M-LQS | Lv-Qiao-Sha | Marketplaces | 1.5 | 0.70 | 0.03 |
| (22) | M-LQS | Lv-Qiao-Sha | Marketplaces | 2.5 | 0.74 | 0.03 |
| (23) | M-LQS | Lv-Qiao-Sha | Marketplaces | 1.3 | 0.72 | 0.03 |
| (24) | M-LQS | Lv-Qiao-Sha | Marketplaces | 1.5 | 0.52 | 0.03 |
| (25) | M-LQS | Lv-Qiao-Sha | Marketplaces | 1.2 | 0.64 | 0.03 |
Distinguishing positive rates of three classifiers (NBN, RBF, and RF) of original and optimum data set.
| Cliassifer | Original data set | Optimum data set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenfold cross-validation | External test set validation | Tenfold cross validation | External test set validation | |
| NBN | 54 | 56 | 78 | 84 |
| RBF | 66 | 72 | 78 | 84 |
| RF | 64 | 76 | 78 | 84 |
Figure 2PCA score plot responses to Sha-Ren samples with PC1 and PC2.