| Literature DB >> 29692830 |
Radovan Žižka1,2, Radim Čtvrtlík3, Jan Tomaštík3, Kamila Fačevicová4, Ladislav Gregor2, Jiří Šedý5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the microhardness and modulus of elasticity (MOE) of White ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) after setting in moist or dry intracanal conditions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To simulate root canal system, 14 polyethylen molds with internal diameter of 1 mm and height of 12 mm were used. These molds were filled with 9-mm thick layers of White ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK). The experimental group (n=7) had a damp cotton pellet with 1.5 mm height and a 1.5 mm layer of resin composite placed on it. In control group (n=7) the whole 3 mm above MTA were filled with resin composite. The specimens were kept in 37°C and relative humidity of 80% for 4 days in order to simulate physiological conditions. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and nanoindentation tests were carried out using Berkovich indenter at loading rate of 2 mN/s at 4×5 matrices of indents which were located in the coronal, middle and apical thirds of the specimen's cross section, to evaluate the microhardness and modulus of elasticity of the specimen to appraise the progression of the setting process. Differences were assessed using nonparametric generalized Friedman rank sum and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests.Entities:
Keywords: Microhardness; Mineral Trioxide Aggregate; Modulus of Elasticity; Nanoindentation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29692830 PMCID: PMC5800436 DOI: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.15561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Endod J ISSN: 1735-7497
Figure 1Specimen and indent´s matrices (image taken with confocal microscope)
Descriptive statistics of measured data of microhardness
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.52 (0.46) |
| 1.14 (0.40) |
|
| 1.42 (0.36) |
| 1.30 (0.52) |
|
| 1.40 (0.33) |
| 1.27 (0.56) |
Descriptive statistics of measured data of elastic modulus
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 46.94 (8.02) |
| 36.72 (7.28) |
|
| 45.60 (7.35) |
| 40.56 (8.74) |
|
| 42.75 (7.93) |
| 37.72 (7.82) |
Figure 2Scatter plot of microhardness and modulus elasticity of MTA