Literature DB >> 29692691

Ureteric Stent Use - Part of the Solution and Part of the Problem.

Victor G Ilie1, Vlad I Ilie2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to comprehensively report on a single tertiary referral center experience with the use of ureteric stents, assess complication burden and determine risk factors to further inform institutional practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospectively analyzed cohorts includes 529 patients treated over a 12 months period. Data regarding details of the index pathology, stent characteristics and complications were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS: Most stents (58.9%) were used in the context of stone surgery. Stent encrustation occurred in 14.5% of patients and sepsis in 4.3%. There was a statistically significant difference between the complications of the stents removed after 90 days and the rest of the cohort. Infectious complications were more frequent in diabetic patients and in patients with chronic renal impairment. At our institution, we managed to avoid forgotten stents and catastrophic complications.
CONCLUSION: Stent complications are the complex outcome of interplay between the foreign body and the collecting system environment, influenced by the nature and timing of surgery. Longer stent dwelling times are associated with increased complications rates, especially in patients with significant comorbidities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stent encrustation; Stent symptoms; Ureteric stent

Year:  2018        PMID: 29692691      PMCID: PMC5903468          DOI: 10.1159/000447206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  15 in total

Review 1.  Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky?

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; John M Russell
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Do ureteric stent extraction strings affect stent-related quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a prospective randomised control trial.

Authors:  Kerri T Barnes; Megan T Bing; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Experience with indwelling silicone rubber ureteral catheters.

Authors:  R P Gibbons; J T Mason; R J Correa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents.

Authors:  Elijah O Kehinde; Vincent O Rotimi; Adel Al-Hunayan; Hamdy Abdul-Halim; Fareeda Boland; Khaleel A Al-Awadi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Factors predisposing to urinary tract infection after J ureteral stent insertion.

Authors:  Elijah O Kehinde; Vincnet O Rotimi; Khaleel A Al-Awadi; Hamdy Abdul-Halim; Fareeda Boland; Adel Al-Hunayan; Aleyamma Pazhoor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Heparin coating reduces encrustation of ureteral stents: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Claus R Riedl; Marc Witkowski; Eugen Plas; Heinz Pflueger
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 7.  Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Haleblian; Kittinut Kijvikai; Jean de la Rosette; Glenn Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent.

Authors:  R P Finney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Effect of tamsulosin in preventing ureteral stent-related morbidity: a prospective study.

Authors:  Rocco Damiano; Riccardo Autorino; Marco De Sio; Alessandro Giacobbe; Italo Michele Palumbo; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Preventing the forgotten ureteral stent: implementation of a web-based stent registry with automatic recall application.

Authors:  Mark F Lynch; Khurshid R Ghani; Ian Frost; Ken M Anson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Hughes; Amelia Pietropaolo; Patrick Jones; Marco Oderda; Paolo Gontero; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Authors:  Kaiyang Yin; Prajan Divakar; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.

Authors:  Amelia Pietropaolo; Thomas Hughes; Loretta Tear; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-07-24

4.  Single Session Endoscopic Removal of Bilateral Ureteric Stents Retained for Three Decades: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danny Darlington; Fatima Shirly Anitha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-22

5.  Does potassium citrate administration change the type and composition of encrusted material on Double-J stent compared to primary stone?

Authors:  Abdolreza Mohammadi; Mohammad Mehdi Rakebi; Maryam Gholamnezhad; Mahin Ahmadi Pishkuhi; Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.370

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.