| Literature DB >> 29692676 |
Abstract
PURPOSE: Through the use of the trans-vaginal ultrasound-guided pinpoint transfer method, the aim was to ensure the safety of the embryo being transferred in cases of difficult cervixes. It also was aimed to be able to stop embryo transfers in difficult cases and to be able to restart the process under anesthesia or cryopreservation.Entities:
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology therapy; blastocyst; embryo; ultrasonography; uterine cervix
Year: 2018 PMID: 29692676 PMCID: PMC5902464 DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Med Biol ISSN: 1445-5781
Figure 1Pinpoint embryo transfer method procedure
Figure 2Double catheter that was developed for use in the Pinpoint method
Figure 3Photograph of the catheter that is loaded with the embryo being inserted. Outer catheter insertion: Outer catheter tip is fixed to the internal os. The probe then is reinserted and matched to the internal os echo. Next, the surgeon places the probe in his or her left hand, so that now both the probe and the catheter are in the left hand. Thus, the outer catheter tube insertion is performed not at the start of the embryo transfer, but rather as a prior stage to embryo transfer. Inner catheter insertion: Inner catheter is inserted into the outer catheter and the surgeon confirms that the inner and outer catheter tips are aligned by using the double‐line mark on the inner catheter. The surgeon then shifts his or her attention to the ultrasound tomography display and inserts the catheter 1‐2 cm while monitoring the position of the tip on the screen. Once the tip reaches the center of the uterine cavity, the surgeon in charge of the transfer instructs the embryologist, who is on stand‐by beside the surgeon, to press the syringe piston 10 γ to complete the transfer
Figure 4Differences in the individual uterine shapes and embryo transfer results using the trans‐vaginal ultrasound guided pinpoint method. Uterine shapes can differ markedly. When an embryo transfer is performed by using trans‐vaginal ultrasound guidance, it is absolutely imperative that the embryo transfer site is identified accurately
Clinical results of the assisted reproductive technology procedures that were performed at this study's clinic during 2011
| Fresh embryo transfer (mean age = 36.1) | Vitrified‐warmed embryo transfer (36.3) | Total (36.3) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Easy case | 1 (35.1) | 2 (38.6) | 1 (36.2) | 2 (37.8) | ||||
| 55/226 | 22/85 | 133/321 | 7/20 | |||||
| (24.8%) | (25.9%) | (41.4%) | (35%) | |||||
| 78/311 (25.1%) | 140/341 (41.1%) | 218/652 (33.4%) | ||||||
| Difficult case | Local anesthesia | 0/3 | 0/5 | 0/2 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 0/0 | |
| General anesthesia | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | ||||
| total | 0/6 (0%) | 3/8 (37.5%) | 3/14 (21.4%) | |||||
| Total | 56/230 (24.3%) | 22/87 (25.3%) | 136/329 (41.3%) | 7/20 (35.0%) | 221/666 (33.2%) | |||
Between January 4 and December 27, 2011, a total of 666 cases (317 fresh embryo transfers, 349 cryogenically preserved embryo transfers) was handled, resulting in 221 pregnancies (pregnancy rate: 33.2%). This number represents the number of clinically confirmed pregnancies. Fourteen cases involved difficult transfers. During the year in question, local anesthetic was used in only three cases in which pregnancy was subsequently confirmed, but there are reports of pregnancy being confirmed when general anesthetic is used. The number of transferred embryos was in accordance with the views of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan.