Literature DB >> 29692443

Comparing Student Performance on the Old vs New Versions of the NAPLEX.

Adam C Welch1, Samuel C Karpen1.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine if the new 2016 version of the North American Pharmacy Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) affected scores when controlling for student performance on other measures using data from one institution. Methods. There were 201 records from the classes of 2014-2016. Doubly robust estimation using weighted propensity scores was used to compare NAPLEX scaled scores and pass rates while considering student performance on other measures. Of the potential controllers of student performance: Pharmacy Curricular Outcomes Assessment (PCOA), scaled composite scores from the Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT), and P3 Grade Point Average (GPA). Only PCOA and P3 GPA were found to be appropriate for propensity scoring. Results. The weighted NAPLEX scaled scores did not significantly drop from the old (2014-2015) to the new (2016) version of NAPLEX. The change in pass rates between the new and old versions of NAPLEX were also non-significant. Conclusion. Using data from one institution, the new version itself of the NAPLEX did not have a significant effect on NAPLEX scores or first-time pass rates when controlling for student performance on other measures. Colleges are encouraged to repeat this analysis with pooled data and larger sample sizes.

Keywords:  NAPLEX; assessment; logistic models; pass rates; pharmacy licensure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29692443      PMCID: PMC5909875          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  1 in total

1.  Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Daniel Westreich; Chris Wiesen; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.897

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the Relationship Between Didactic Performance and Standardized Examination Scores in Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Kimberly K Daugherty; Daniel R Malcom
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Predictors of Success for the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination.

Authors:  Sharon K Park; Jennifer Phillips; Nina Pavuluri
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Association between graduates' factors and success rate on the Saudi Pharmacist Licensure Examination: A single-Institution cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alhifany; Faisal A Almalki; Yasser M Alatawi; Linah A Basindowh; Shefaa S Almajnoni; Mahmoud E Elrggal; Amal F Alotaibi; Safa S Almarzoky Abuhussain; Thamer A Almangour
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.330

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.