Terril L Verplaetse1, Andrea H Weinberger2, Rebecca L Ashare3, Brian P Pittman1, Julia M Shi4, Jeanette M Tetrault4, Meaghan Lavery1, Sherry A McKee1. 1. 1 Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. 2 Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Separate α1- and β-adrenergic antagonists have shown efficacy in reducing nicotine-motivated behaviors in rodents and humans, supporting a role for the noradrenergic system in mediating the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. However, the effect of the combined α1- and β-adrenergic antagonist, carvedilol, on stress-related smoking is unknown. METHODS: Using a well-established human laboratory model of stress-precipitated smoking-lapse behavior, we examined whether carvedilol (0 or 50 mg/day; between subject, n=17 per group), administered to steady-state, would attenuate the ability to resist smoking following stress imagery (vs. neutral imagery) and reduce subsequent smoking self-administration in nicotine-deprived smokers ( n = 34 total). Tobacco craving, withdrawal, and physiologic reactivity were also assessed. RESULTS:Latency to start smoking and number of cigarettes smoked during the self-administration period did not differ by medication condition. Counter to our hypothesis, tobacco craving demonstrated a medication × time effect, with greater craving in the carvedilol condition. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate demonstrated lower values in the carvedilol versus placebo group, consistent with known effects of carvedilol. CONCLUSION: While carvedilol attenuated physiologic reactivity consistent with its clinical indication, beneficial effects on smoking outcomes were absent in this preliminary investigation and may suggest possible worsening. Future work may benefit from discerning the single versus combined effects of α1- and β-adrenergic antagonism on smoking outcomes.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Separate α1- and β-adrenergic antagonists have shown efficacy in reducing nicotine-motivated behaviors in rodents and humans, supporting a role for the noradrenergic system in mediating the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. However, the effect of the combined α1- and β-adrenergic antagonist, carvedilol, on stress-related smoking is unknown. METHODS: Using a well-established human laboratory model of stress-precipitated smoking-lapse behavior, we examined whether carvedilol (0 or 50 mg/day; between subject, n=17 per group), administered to steady-state, would attenuate the ability to resist smoking following stress imagery (vs. neutral imagery) and reduce subsequent smoking self-administration in nicotine-deprived smokers ( n = 34 total). Tobacco craving, withdrawal, and physiologic reactivity were also assessed. RESULTS: Latency to start smoking and number of cigarettes smoked during the self-administration period did not differ by medication condition. Counter to our hypothesis, tobacco craving demonstrated a medication × time effect, with greater craving in the carvedilol condition. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate demonstrated lower values in the carvedilol versus placebo group, consistent with known effects of carvedilol. CONCLUSION: While carvedilol attenuated physiologic reactivity consistent with its clinical indication, beneficial effects on smoking outcomes were absent in this preliminary investigation and may suggest possible worsening. Future work may benefit from discerning the single versus combined effects of α1- and β-adrenergic antagonism on smoking outcomes.
Authors: Sherry A McKee; Andrea H Weinberger; Julia Shi; Jeanette Tetrault; Sabrina Coppola Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sherry A McKee; Rajita Sinha; Andrea H Weinberger; Mehmet Sofuoglu; Emily L R Harrison; Meaghan Lavery; Jesse Wanzer Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Terril L Verplaetse; Brian P Pittman; Julia M Shi; Jeanette M Tetrault; Sabrina Coppola; Sherry A McKee Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Adrie W Bruijnzeel; Mahendra Bishnoi; Irma A van Tuijl; Kim F M Keijzers; Kate R Yavarovich; Tim M Pasek; Jenna Ford; Jon C Alexander; Hidetaka Yamada Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Terril L Verplaetse; Walter Roberts; Kelly E Moore; MacKenzie R Peltier; Lindsay M Oberleitner; Sherry A McKee Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 3.153