Literature DB >> 29692192

An animal tissue simulation assessing three directional displacement forces on five common tracheostomy securing techniques.

D Yap1, S Goddard2, M Ng3, A Al-Hussaini3, D Owens3.   

Abstract

Introduction Several methods of securing a tracheostomy tube have been described in the literature including using ties or tapes around the neck and suturing the plastic flange to the neck in various ways. However, there are no wet lab-based studies to objectively determine the force required to displace the tracheostomy tube using different securing techniques. Ours is the first animal tissue simulation study published in the literature. Methods A simulated tracheostomy stoma was created on a sheep neck model. A tracheostomy tube was inserted into the stoma and secured using various methods. Tension tests were conducted to significantly displace the tube from the stoma. Each technique was repeated six times on different sheep necks. All results were analysed using SPSS®. Results Repeat measurements indicated that the largest displacement forces come from an oblique direction while the lowest force values were found at the lateral angle. Averages of displacement showed that medially placed sutures required the largest forces in comparison with other securing methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing indicated that medial and continuous suture security resists displacement at forces that otherwise displace flange and interrupted sutures. Conclusions This study has shown that any type of securing suture requires a greater displacement force than the strap of the tracheostomy tube holder alone. Medially placed sutures require a greater displacement force than those placed laterally. Displacement in the lateral direction requires the least force in comparison with movement at perpendicular or oblique angles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway management; Neck; Suture techniques; Torque; Tracheostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29692192      PMCID: PMC6111910          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tracheotomy complications: a retrospective study of 1130 cases.

Authors:  D Goldenberg; E G Ari; A Golz; J Danino; A Netzer; H Z Joachims
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Repositioning a displaced tracheostomy tube with an Aintree intubation catheter mounted on a fibre-optic bronchoscope.

Authors:  R Rajendram; N McGuire
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  How I do it: securing tracheostomy tubes.

Authors:  Leonard Liew; Nicholas Gibbins; Manuel Oyarzabal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The effect of suturing on force for dislodgement of tracheostomy tubes: medial versus lateral sutures.

Authors:  Shaina Schaetzel; Jeremy Juern; Kristen Kiehl; Qun Xiang; John Weigelt
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Securing a tracheostomy when circumferential ties may compromise flap perfusion: the 'epaulette' technique.

Authors:  Peter Loizou; P A Tierney; J Savage
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  A four-point suture fixation technique for securing surgical tracheostomies.

Authors:  S A R Nouraei; S M Nouraei; T Upile; M Taylor; A Patel; G S Sandhu
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 7.  Anatomy and physiology of tracheostomy.

Authors:  Scott K Epstein
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.258

8.  Preventing accidental decannulations following tracheostomy.

Authors:  T L Black; E T Fernandes; M G Carr
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.545

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.