Literature DB >> 29691942

Phenological sensitivity to climate change is higher in resident than in migrant bird populations among European cavity breeders.

Jelmer M Samplonius1, Lenka Bartošová2, Malcolm D Burgess3,4, Andrey V Bushuev5, Tapio Eeva6, Elena V Ivankina7, Anvar B Kerimov5, Indrikis Krams8,9, Toni Laaksonen6, Marko Mägi8, Raivo Mänd8, Jaime Potti10, János Török11, Miroslav Trnka2, Marcel E Visser12, Herwig Zang13, Christiaan Both1.   

Abstract

Many organisms adjust their reproductive phenology in response to climate change, but phenological sensitivity to temperature may vary between species. For example, resident and migratory birds have vastly different annual cycles, which can cause differential temperature sensitivity at the breeding grounds, and may affect competitive dynamics. Currently, however, adjustment to climate change in resident and migratory birds have been studied separately or at relatively small geographical scales with varying time series durations and methodologies. Here, we studied differential effects of temperature on resident and migratory birds using the mean egg laying initiation dates from 10 European nest box schemes between 1991 and 2015 that had data on at least one resident tit species and at least one migratory flycatcher species. We found that both tits and flycatchers advanced laying in response to spring warming, but resident tit populations advanced more strongly in relation to temperature increases than migratory flycatchers. These different temperature responses have already led to a divergence in laying dates between tits and flycatchers of on average 0.94 days per decade over the current study period. Interestingly, this divergence was stronger at lower latitudes where the interval between tit and flycatcher phenology is smaller and winter conditions can be considered more favorable for resident birds. This could indicate that phenological adjustment to climate change by flycatchers is increasingly hampered by competition with resident species. Indeed, we found that tit laying date had an additional effect on flycatcher laying date after controlling for temperature, and this effect was strongest in areas with the shortest interval between both species groups. Combined, our results suggest that the differential effect of climate change on species groups with overlapping breeding ecology affects the phenological interval between them, potentially affecting interspecific interactions.
© 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  adaptation; birds; climate change; competition; information use; laying date; nest boxes; timing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29691942     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  Dehydration risk is associated with reduced nest attendance and hatching success in a cooperatively breeding bird, the southern pied babbler Turdoides bicolor.

Authors:  Amanda R Bourne; Amanda R Ridley; Andrew E McKechnie; Claire N Spottiswoode; Susan J Cunningham
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Epidemiology of human West Nile virus infections in the European Union and European Union enlargement countries, 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Johanna J Young; Joana M Haussig; Stephan W Aberle; Danai Pervanidou; Flavia Riccardo; Nebojša Sekulić; Tamás Bakonyi; Céline M Gossner
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2021-05

3.  Migratory behavior and winter geography drive differential range shifts of eastern birds in response to recent climate change.

Authors:  Clark S Rushing; J Andrew Royle; David J Ziolkowski; Keith L Pardieck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Associations of breeding-bird abundance with climate vary among species and trait-based groups in southern California.

Authors:  Frank A Fogarty; Daniel R Cayan; Laurel L DeHaan; Erica Fleishman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Recent phenological shifts of migratory birds at a Mediterranean spring stopover site: Species wintering in the Sahel advance passage more than tropical winterers.

Authors:  Ivan Maggini; Massimiliano Cardinale; Jonas Hentati Sundberg; Fernando Spina; Leonida Fusani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bird populations most exposed to climate change are less sensitive to climatic variation.

Authors:  Liam D Bailey; Martijn van de Pol; Frank Adriaensen; Aneta Arct; Emilio Barba; Paul E Bellamy; Suzanne Bonamour; Jean-Charles Bouvier; Malcolm D Burgess; Anne Charmantier; Camillo Cusimano; Blandine Doligez; Szymon M Drobniak; Anna Dubiec; Marcel Eens; Tapio Eeva; Peter N Ferns; Anne E Goodenough; Ian R Hartley; Shelley A Hinsley; Elena Ivankina; Rimvydas Juškaitis; Bart Kempenaers; Anvar B Kerimov; Claire Lavigne; Agu Leivits; Mark C Mainwaring; Erik Matthysen; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Markku Orell; Seppo Rytkönen; Juan Carlos Senar; Ben C Sheldon; Alberto Sorace; Martyn J Stenning; János Török; Kees van Oers; Emma Vatka; Stefan J G Vriend; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Ecological traps: evidence of a fitness cost in a cavity-nesting bird.

Authors:  Ronalds Krams; Tatjana Krama; Guntis Brūmelis; Didzis Elferts; Linda Strode; Iluta Dauškane; Severi Luoto; Agnis Šmits; Indrikis A Krams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effects of four decades of climate change on the breeding ecology of an avian sentinel species across a 1,500-km latitudinal gradient are stronger at high latitudes.

Authors:  Marta Lomas Vega; Thord Fransson; Cecilia Kullberg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Extra-pair paternity explains cooperation in a bird species.

Authors:  Indrikis A Krams; Adèle Mennerat; Tatjana Krama; Ronalds Krams; Priit Jõers; Didzis Elferts; Severi Luoto; Markus J Rantala; Sigrunn Eliassen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 12.779

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.