Nathan A Gillespie1,2, Michael C Neale1, Timothy C Bates3, Lisa T Eyler4,5, Christine Fennema-Notestine5, Jasmin Vassileva6, Michael J Lyons7, Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley8, Katie L McMahon9, Paul M Thompson9, Greig de Zubicaray10,11, Ian B Hickie12, John J McGrath13,14, Lachlan T Strike2,9,10, Miguel E Rentería2, Matthew S Panizzon5, Nicholas G Martin2, Carol E Franz5, William S Kremen5,14, Margaret J Wright2,9. 1. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavior Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA. 2. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, QLD, Australia. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK. 4. Desert-Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, CA, USA. 6. Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA. 7. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA. 9. Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia. 10. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia. 11. Faculty of Health and Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 12. Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. 13. Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia. 14. VA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disentangling the putative impact of cannabis on brain morphology from other comorbid substance use is critical. After controlling for the effects of nicotine, alcohol and multi-substance use, this study aimed to determine whether frequent cannabis use is associated with significantly smaller subcortical grey matter volumes. DESIGN: Exploratory analyses using mixed linear models, one per region of interest (ROI), were performed whereby individual differences in volume (outcome) at seven subcortical ROIs were regressed onto cannabis and comorbid substance use (predictors). SETTING: Two large population-based twin samples from the United States and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 622 young Australian adults [66% female; μage = 25.9, standard deviation SD) = 3.6] and 474 middle-aged US males (μage = 56.1SD = 2.6 ) of predominately Anglo-Saxon ancestry with complete substance use and imaging data. Subjects with a history of stroke or traumatic brain injury were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and volumetric segmentation methods were used to estimate volume in seven subcortical ROIs: thalamus, caudate nucleus, putamen, pallidum, hippocampus, amygdala and nucleus accumbens. Substance use measurements included maximum nicotine and alcohol use, total life-time multi-substance use, maximum cannabis use in the young adults and regular cannabis use in the middle-aged males. FINDINGS: After correcting for multiple testing (P = 0.007), cannabis use was unrelated to any subcortical ROI. However, maximum nicotine use was associated with significantly smaller thalamus volumes in middle-aged males. CONCLUSIONS: In exploratory analyses based on young adult and middle-aged samples, normal variation in cannabis use is unrelated statistically to individual differences in brain morphology as measured by subcortical volume.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disentangling the putative impact of cannabis on brain morphology from other comorbid substance use is critical. After controlling for the effects of nicotine, alcohol and multi-substance use, this study aimed to determine whether frequent cannabis use is associated with significantly smaller subcortical grey matter volumes. DESIGN: Exploratory analyses using mixed linear models, one per region of interest (ROI), were performed whereby individual differences in volume (outcome) at seven subcortical ROIs were regressed onto cannabis and comorbid substance use (predictors). SETTING: Two large population-based twin samples from the United States and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 622 young Australian adults [66% female; μage = 25.9, standard deviation SD) = 3.6] and 474 middle-aged US males (μage = 56.1SD = 2.6 ) of predominately Anglo-Saxon ancestry with complete substance use and imaging data. Subjects with a history of stroke or traumatic brain injury were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and volumetric segmentation methods were used to estimate volume in seven subcortical ROIs: thalamus, caudate nucleus, putamen, pallidum, hippocampus, amygdala and nucleus accumbens. Substance use measurements included maximum nicotine and alcohol use, total life-time multi-substance use, maximum cannabis use in the young adults and regular cannabis use in the middle-aged males. FINDINGS: After correcting for multiple testing (P = 0.007), cannabis use was unrelated to any subcortical ROI. However, maximum nicotine use was associated with significantly smaller thalamus volumes in middle-aged males. CONCLUSIONS: In exploratory analyses based on young adult and middle-aged samples, normal variation in cannabis use is unrelated statistically to individual differences in brain morphology as measured by subcortical volume.
Authors: Killian A Welch; Andrew C Stanfield; Andrew M McIntosh; Heather C Whalley; Dominic E Job; Thomas W Moorhead; David G C Owens; Stephen M Lawrie; Eve C Johnstone Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Avshalom Caspi; Antony Ambler; HonaLee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richard S E Keefe; Kay McDonald; Aimee Ward; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Linda Chang; Christine Cloak; Kari Patterson; Charles Grob; Eric N Miller; Thomas Ernst Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Hanan El Marroun; Henning Tiemeier; Ingmar H A Franken; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Aad van der Lugt; Frank C Verhulst; Benjamin B Lahey; Tonya White Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jodi M Gilman; John K Kuster; Sang Lee; Myung Joo Lee; Byoung Woo Kim; Nikos Makris; Andre van der Kouwe; Anne J Blood; Hans C Breiter Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Teresa R Franklin; Reagan R Wetherill; Kanchana Jagannathan; Barbara Johnson; Joel Mumma; Nathan Hager; Hengyi Rao; Anna Rose Childress Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rachel E Thayer; Sophie L YorkWilliams; Kent E Hutchison; Angela D Bryan Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Jill A Rabinowitz; Adrian I Campos; Jue-Sheng Ong; Luis M García-Marín; Sarael Alcauter; Brittany L Mitchell; Katrina L Grasby; Gabriel Cuéllar-Partida; Nathan A Gillespie; Andrew S Huhn; Nicholas G Martin; Paul M Thompson; Sarah E Medland; Brion S Maher; Miguel E Rentería Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Marinka M G Koenis; Joke Durnez; Amanda L Rodrigue; Samuel R Mathias; Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Jennifer A Barrett; Gaelle E Doucet; Sophia Frangou; Emma E M Knowles; Josephine Mollon; Dominique Denbow; Katrina Aberizk; Molly Zatony; Ronald J Janssen; Joanne E Curran; John Blangero; Russell A Poldrack; Godfrey D Pearlson; David C Glahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 5.038