Literature DB >> 29691675

[Digital pathology : The time has come!]

R Grobholz1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital pathology (DP) and whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology have matured substantially over the last few years. Meanwhile, commercial systems are available that can be used in routine practice. AIMS: Illustration of DP experiences in a routine diagnostic setting. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS:DP system offers several advantages: 1) glass slides are no longer unique; 2) access to cases is possible from any location; 3) digital image analysis can be applied; and 4) archived WSI can be easily accessed. From this point, several secondary advantages arise: a) the slide compilation of the case and the case assignment is fast and safe; b) carrying cases to the pathologist is obsolete and paperless work is possible; c) WSI can be used for a second opinion and be accessible in remote locations; d) WSI of referred cases are still accessible after returning the slides; e) histological images can easily be provided in tumor boards; f) the office desk is clean; and g) a "home office" is possible. To introduce a DP system, a comprehensive workflow analysis is needed that clarifies the needs and wishes of the respective institute. In order to optimally meet the requirements, open DP platforms are of particular advantage, because they enable the integration of scanners from various manufacturers. Further developments in image analysis, such as virtual tissue reconstruction, could enrich the diagnostic process in the future and improve treatment quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic data processing; Computer-assisted image interpretation; Informatics; Pathology; Workflow

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29691675     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-018-0431-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  5 in total

1.  Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre.

Authors:  Chee Leong Cheng; Rafay Azhar; Shi Hui Adeline Sng; Yong Quan Chua; Jacqueline Siok Gek Hwang; Jennifer Poi Fun Chin; Waih Khuen Seah; Janel Chui Ling Loke; Roy Hang Leng Ang; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: beyond technology into best practice and service management.

Authors:  Chee Leong Cheng; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Routine Digital Pathology Workflow: The Catania Experience.

Authors:  Filippo Fraggetta; Salvatore Garozzo; Gian Franco Zannoni; Liron Pantanowitz; Esther Diana Rossi
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-12-19

5.  Standardisation of labial salivary gland histopathology in clinical trials in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  Benjamin A Fisher; Roland Jonsson; Troy Daniels; Michele Bombardieri; Rachel M Brown; Peter Morgan; Stefano Bombardieri; Wan-Fai Ng; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Claudio Vitali; Pepe Shirlaw; Erlin Haacke; Sebastian Costa; Hendrika Bootsma; Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec; Timothy R Radstake; Xavier Mariette; Andrea Richards; Rebecca Stack; Simon J Bowman; Francesca Barone
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 19.103

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.