Jian Liu1, Cun-Shan Shi. 1. Department of Stomatology, People's Hospital of Taizhou City. Taizhou 225300, Jiangsu Province, China. E-mail:liujiantz2008@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effect of 2 methods for acute pulpitis in the night emergency. METHODS:Two hundred and twenty-three patients with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into experimental group (107 cases) and control group (109 cases). Patients in the experimental group was enclosed formaldehyde cresol (FC) with CAVITON-GC after removal of crown pulp, while patients in the control group was treated with open drainage. Pain releasing effect was evaluated and analyzed 2 days after treatment．The data were analysed by t test and χ2 test with SPSS19.0 software package. RESULTS: The average pain index of the experimental group was 1.23, which was lower than that of the control group (3.58), the difference was significant (P<0.05). The treatment efficiency was 93.46% in the experimental group, significantly higher than that in the control group (77.98%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in the experimental group is more effective to relieve pain than simple drainage in the control group.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effect of 2 methods for acute pulpitis in the night emergency. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-three patients with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into experimental group (107 cases) and control group (109 cases). Patients in the experimental group was enclosed formaldehydecresol (FC) with CAVITON-GC after removal of crown pulp, while patients in the control group was treated with open drainage. Pain releasing effect was evaluated and analyzed 2 days after treatment．The data were analysed by t test and χ2 test with SPSS19.0 software package. RESULTS: The average pain index of the experimental group was 1.23, which was lower than that of the control group (3.58), the difference was significant (P<0.05). The treatment efficiency was 93.46% in the experimental group, significantly higher than that in the control group (77.98%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in the experimental group is more effective to relieve pain than simple drainage in the control group.
Authors: Rohit Agrawal; Monika Bhardwaj; Bonita Doley; Abhigyan Manas; Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail; Prajakta B Patil; Kishore K Singh Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2022-05-14