| Literature DB >> 29691464 |
Ojekunle Z O1, Jinadu O O E2, Afolabi T A3, Taiwo A M2.
Abstract
This study aimed at assessing the environmental pollution and related hazards of industries at Agbara, Ogun State, Nigeria. A total of five sampling points were identified and selected at random. Environmental samples were collected on a weekly basis for duration of 10 weeks. Air pollutants measured were CO2, CO, NO, NOx, VOCs, H2S, SO2, NH3, PM2.5 andPM10 using standard procedure. Dust and plant samples were also collected and analyzed for heavy metals (Pb, Cr, Cd, Cu and Zn) using the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). Data was evaluated for descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS for Windows version 22.0. Air pollution data were also subjected to SPE-risk model. The results of highest measured air parameters were: CO (5.50 ± 2.32 ppm), CO2 (3.00 ± 2.05%), NOx (0.90 ± 0.32 ppm), NO (0.60 ± 0.52 ppm), PM10 (0.40 ± 0.52 mg/m3) and PM2.5 (0.20 ± 0.42 mg/m3). The results of heavy metal concentrations in dust samples were: 57.40 ± 13.28 mg/kg for Cu, 45.36 ± 12.37 mg/kg for Cr, 22.80 ± 17.36 mg/kg for Zn, 13.76 ± 3.08 mg/kg for Pb and 0.32 ± 0.36 mg/kg for Cd. Metal concentrations in plants were: Cu (70.07 ± 16.24 mg/kg), Zn (67.69 ± 14.50 mg/kg), Cr (22.46 ± 9.35 mg/kg), Pb (13.76 ± 3.08 mg/kg) and Cd (2.25 ± 3.04 mg/kg). This study revealed the concentrations of CO2, NOx and NO higher than the World Health Organization (WHO) permissible standards while Pb, Cu, Cr, Cd and Zn values in dust samples were also found above the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) and the WHO standards. Results of SPE-RISK model indicated that CO2, CO, Pb, Cu and Zn posed the greatest health risks, while the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indentified pollutant sources from industrial and vehicle exhaust.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29691464 PMCID: PMC5915402 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24810-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Area map of Agbara.
Equipment and their uses.
| Equipment | Readings |
|---|---|
| Air borne particulate monitor, model – PDR-1200 | %CO2, CO, SO2, NO and NOX |
| Industrial Scientific iTX Multi Gas Monitor Tester iSP Sample Pump | H2S, NH3 and VOC |
| Thermo Scientific pDR-1000AN (Personal Data Ram) | PM10 and PM2.5 |
| eTrex Legend H – Garmin GPS Handheld device | GPS co-ordinates |
Air pollutant concentrations at the various sampling points in Agbara industrial area.
| Location codes | CO2 (%) | CO (ppm) | NO (ppm) | NOX (ppm) | H2S (ppm) | VOC (ppm) | SO2 (ppm) | NH3 (ppm) | PM2.5 (mg/m3) | PM10 (mg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | 2.20 ± 1.03a | 5.50 ± 2.32a | 0.60 ± 0.52a | 0.70 ± 0.48a | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.0000 | 0.30 ± 0.48a |
| SP2 | 2.10 ± 1.00a | 4.10 ± 2.88a | 0.30 ± 0.48a | 0.90 ± 0.32a | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.42a | 0.40 ± 0.52a |
| SP3 | 2.00 ± 1.49a | 1.90 ± 1.45bc | 0.40 ± 0.52a | 0.60 ± 0.52a | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.42a |
| SP4 | 3.00 ± 2.05a | 3.90 ± 3.11ab | 0.50 ± 0.53a | 0.80 ± 0.63a | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.32a |
| SP5 | 2.20 ± 1.23a | 1.10 ± 0.88c | 0.20 ± 0.42a | 0.67 ± 0.50a | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.42a |
| FEPA (1991) Standards | 0.1 | 10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.008 | 3 | 0.2 | 0.28 | 80 | |
| WHO (1990) | 0.08 | 25 |
SP1- Industrial Roadside, SP2- Lagos Badagry express way, SP3-Market area, SP4-Banking district, SP5-Residential area, Different super scripts (alphabets) in the same column indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Heavy metals concentration in plant samples.
| Locations | Pb (mg/kg) | Cd (mg/kg) | Cr (mg/kg) | Cu (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | 7.20 ± 1.77c | 0.45 ± 0.14b | 22.46 ± 9.35a | 70.07 ± 16.24a | 21.80 ± 7.51c |
| SP2 | 10.98 ± 1.77b | 1.51 ± 0.37ab | 7.75 ± 3.84c | 54.56 ± 13.82bc | 22.60 ± 6,03c |
| SP3 | 13.76 ± 3.08a | 2.25 ± 3.04a | 12.61 ± 2.14b | 62.55 ± 6.90ab | 67.69 ± 14.50a |
| SP4 | 4.15 ± 1.34d | 0.26 ± 0.25b | 8.35 ± 1.48c | 48.01 ± 12.37c | 36.40 ± 7.44b |
| SP5 | 7.36 ± 1.39c | 0.23 ± 0.34b | 2.88 ± 1.14d | 28.56 ± 6.07d | 43.40 ± 7.31b |
| WHO limits of Heavy Metals in Plants | 2 | 0.02 | 1.3 | 10 |
SP1- Industrial Roadside, SP2- Lagos Badagry express way, SP3-Market area, SP4-Banking district, SP5-Residential area, Different super scripts (alphabets) in the same column indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Heavy metal concentrations in dust samples.
| Location | Pb (mg/kg) | Cd (mg/kg) | Cr (mg/kg) | Cu (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | 9.00 ± 4.15a | 0.17 ± 0.14bc | 45.36 ± 12.37a | 17.76 ± 1.82ab | 32.43 ± 18.48b |
| SP2 | 12.33 ± 4.08a | 0.49 ± 0.60a | 30.37 ± 14.55bc | 18.70 ± 26.34ab | 26.31 ± 8.49b |
| SP3 | 10.79 ± 4.56a | 0.32 ± 0.36ab | 26.41 ± 12.93c | 22.80 ± 17.36a | 57.40 ± 13.28a |
| SP4 | 11.10 ± 3.03a | <0.01 | 39.40 ± 8.53ab | 15.30 ± 4.24ab | 33.40 ± 14.70b |
| SP5 | 9.40 ± 2.12a | <0.01 | 9.70 ± 3.09d | 6.70 ± 2.54b | 8.80 ± 2.30c |
| FEPA (1991) Standard | 0.01 | 0.003 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| WHO (1984) Standards | 0.05 | 0.005 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.5 |
SP1- Industrial Roadside, SP2- Lagos Badagry express way, SP3-Market area, SP4-Banking district, SP5-Residential area, Different super scripts (alphabets) in the same column indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Principal component analysis of air pollutants.
| Parameters | Factors | Communalities | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| CO2 | −0.013 |
| 0.156 |
|
| CO |
| 0.010 | 0.158 |
|
| NO |
| −0.226 | −0.287 |
|
| NOX |
| 0.115 | 0.046 |
|
| PM10 | 0.042 | −0.025 |
|
|
| PM2.5 | −0.003 |
| −0.205 |
|
| %Variance | 27 | 20 | 18 | |
| Sources | Vehicular | Industrial 1 | Road dust | |
Principal component analysis of metals in dusts.
| Parameters | Factors | Communalities | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Pb |
| 0.153 |
|
| Cd |
| 0.221 |
|
| Cr | −0.022 |
|
|
| Cu | 0.146 |
|
|
| Zn |
| −0.340 |
|
| %Variance | 35 | 31 | |
| Sources | Engine exhaust | Industrial | |
Risk analysis of air pollutants on the environment and human at Agbara industrial district.
| Parameter Measured | F. Identity Risk | Probability (P) | Severity (S) | Exposure (E) | Risk Calculation (SxPxE) | Risk Level | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon dioxide (CO2)concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Frequent (5) | Critical (3) | Great (4) | 60.00 | High | Immediate correction needed before proceeding. Worn-out control devices at industries should be replaced while VIO should be more proactive with vehicle emission inspection. Continuous oversight & re-evaluation is required. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than initially calculated. |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Frequent (5) | Catastrophic (4) | Above Average (3) | 60.00 | High | Immediate correction needed before proceeding. Worn-out control devices at industries should be replaced while VIO should be more proactive with vehicle emission inspection. Continuous oversight & re-evaluation is required. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than initially calculated. |
| Nitrogen oxide (NO) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Likely (4) | Critical (3) | Average (2) | 24.00 | Possible | Acceptable. Some attention needed. Implement risk reduction controls to further reduce the level of risk as appropriate. |
| Other oxides of nitrogen (NOx) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Likely (4) | Critical (3) | Average (2) | 24.00 | Possible | Acceptable. Some attention needed. Implement risk reduction controls to further reduce the level of risk as appropriate. |
| Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Rarely (1) | Minor (1) | Below average (1) | 1.00 | Slight | Acceptable |
| Volatile organic compounds (VOC) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Occasional (3) | Catastrophic (4) | Average (2) | 24.00 | Possible | Acceptable. Some attention needed. Implement risk reduction controls to further reduce the level of risk as appropriate. |
| Ammonia (NH3) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Likely (4) | Minor (1) | Above Average (3) | 12.00 | Slight | Acceptable |
| Sulphur dioxide (SO2) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Occasional (3) | Significant (4) | Above Average (3) | 36.00 | Possible | Acceptable. Some attention needed. Implement risk reduction controls to further reduce the level of risk as appropriate. |
| Particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Frequent (5) | Critical (3) | Above Average (3) | 45.00 | Substantial | Correction and/or risk mitigation is required. Mitigation controls have to be implemented. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than was initially calculated. |
| Particulate matter (PM10) concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Frequent (5) | Critical (3) | Above Average (3) | 45.00 | Substantial | Correction and/or risk mitigation is required. Mitigation controls have to be implemented. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than was initially calculated. |
Risk analysis of heavy metals in dust on the environment and human at Agbara industrial district.
| Parameter Measured | F. Identity Risk | Probability (P) | Severity (S) | Exposure (E) | Risk Calculation (SxPxE) | Risk Level | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Likely (4) | Catastrophic (4) | Significant (4) | 64.00 | High | Immediate correction needed before proceeding. Worn-out control devices at industries should be replaced while VIO should be more proactive with vehicle emission inspection. Continuous oversight & re-evaluation is required. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than initially calculated. |
| Chromium concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Occasional (3) | Critical (3) | Significant (4) | 36.00 | Possible | Acceptable. Some attention needed. Implement risk reduction controls to further reduce the level of risk as appropriate. |
| Cadmuim concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Rarely (2) | Catastrophic (4) | Below average (1) | 8.00 | Slight | Acceptable. |
| Copper concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Frequent (5) | Critical (3) | Great (4) | 60.00 | High | Immediate correction needed. Worn-out control devices at industries should be replaced. Continuous oversight & re-evaluation is required. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than initially calculated. |
| Zinc concentration at Agbara industrial district | Exposure to its on-site concentration | Frequent (5) | Critical (3) | Significant (4) | 60.00 | High | Immediate correction needed. Worn-out control devices at industries should be replaced. Continuous oversight & re-evaluation is required. Risk controls must reduce the level of risk to one that is lower than initially calculated. |