| Literature DB >> 29691436 |
Tom Wilson1, Nicholas P Hylton2, Yukihiro Harada2,3, Phoebe Pearce2, Diego Alonso-Álvarez2, Alex Mellor2, Robert D Richards4, John P R David4, Nicholas J Ekins-Daukes2,5.
Abstract
A comprehensiveEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29691436 PMCID: PMC5915430 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24696-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic diagram of the bulk GaAsBi sample studied in this work, grown via MBE. Representative temperature dependent PL spectra measured at (b) 666.4 Wcm−2 (c) 66.6 Wcm−2 and (d) 13.3 Wcm−2. The normalised luminescence intensity is offset for clarity. The peak luminescence energy is marked with grey symbols and the solid line is to guide the eye.
Figure 2(a) PL peak energy position as a function of temperature for varying incident excitation power. The extracted localisation energy is plotted inset. (b) Excitation power dependence of the integrated luminescence intensity at various temperatures. The solid, dashed and dot-dashed lines indicate power law relations with exponents k = 1.0, k = 2.0 and k = 0.4 respectively.
Figure 3Normalised luminescence intensity spectra (offset for clarity) measured at 30 K as a function of excitation intensity. The solid lines indicate best fits using Equation 3 and the parameters listed in Table 1 for (a) g = g and (b) g = g. The dashed line indicates the position of the mobility edge, E. (c) Integrated luminescence intensity as a function of inverse temperature for varying incident excitation power. The solid curves are produced using Equation 6 with activation energies summarised in Table 2.
Summary of parameters used to fit the data in Fig. 3(a) and (b).
| NMAE (%) | NMAE (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.33 | 80.47 | 0.62 | 84.99 | 0.71 |
| 3.00 | 66.01 | 0.50 | 71.61 | 0.78 |
| 13.33 | 50.60 | 0.70 | 56.32 | 0.87 |
| 76.63 | 28.44 | 0.42 | 37.20 | 1.33 |
| 266.54 | 10.14 | 0.63 | 23.82 | 2.01 |
| 433.13 | 2.43 | 0.79 | 18.09 | 2.42 |
Summary of activation energies used to fit the data in Fig. 3(c) with Equation 6.
| 13.3 | 130 ± 8 | 44 ± 1 |
| 33.3 | 127 ± 8 | 36 ± 1 |
| 66.6 | 138 ± 9 | 34 ± 2 |
| 166.6 | 115 ± 7 | 21 ± 1 |
| 433.1 | 118 ± 6 | 13 ± 1 |
| 666.4 | 105 ± 7 | 10.2 ± 0.7 |
Figure 4(a) The thermal quenching of integrated luminescence intensity for varying incident excitation power. The grey curves illustrate modelled data obtained by solving the rate model described by Equations 9, 10 and 11 considering a uniform (dashed) and two-component (solid) LDOS. (b) Schematic diagram of a dual-component LDOS depicting the processes described in the rate model.
Summary of power dependent rate model parameters.
| 13.3 | 1 × 1019/13 | 120 |
| 66.6 | 1 × 1019/4.3 | 85 |
| 433.1 | 1 × 1019/2.2 | 8 |
| 666.4 | 1 × 1019 | 0 |