R Kaseda1, Y Tsuchida1, J L Gamboa2, J Zhong3, L Zhang4, H Yang3, A Dikalova2, A Bian5, S Davies4, A F Fogo6, M F Linton2, N J Brown2, T A Ikizler2, V Kon7. 1. Pediatric Nephrology, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Pediatric Nephrology, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA; Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, TN, USA. 4. Pharmacology, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Biostatistics, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Pediatric Nephrology, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA; Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, TN, USA. 7. Pediatric Nephrology, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: valentina.kon@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) reduce cardiovascular events in the general population. Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients are at high cardiovascular risk but few studies have directly addressed the comparative efficacy of these drugs. MHD disrupts the normally atheroprotective actions of high density lipoprotein (HDL), therefore, we compared ACEI or ARB treatment on HDL functions in MHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: HDL was isolated at the starting point (pre) and 3-6 months later (post) in 30 MHD randomly assigned to placebo, ramipril or valsartan. Outcomes included cholesterol efflux, inflammatory cytokine response, effects on Toll-like receptors (TLR), superoxide production, methylarginine and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. HDL from ARB- or ACEI-treated subjects was more effective in maintaining efflux than HDL of placebo. HDL from ARB- or ACEI-treated subjects but not placebo lessened cellular superoxide production. In contrast, neither ARB nor ACEI improved HDL anti-inflammatory effect. Indeed, HDL of ACEI-treated subjects potentiated the cytokine responses in association with activation of TLR but did not alter the HDL content of methylarginines or SAA. CONCLUSION: Both ACEI and ARB stabilized HDL cholesterol acceptor function and sustained cellular anti-oxidative effects but not anti-inflammatory effects, and ACEI-treatment instead amplified the HDL inflammatory response. The findings reveal possible utility of antagonizing angiotensin actions in MDH and suggest a possible mechanism for superiority of ARB vs ACEI in the setting of advanced kidney disease.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) reduce cardiovascular events in the general population. Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients are at high cardiovascular risk but few studies have directly addressed the comparative efficacy of these drugs. MHD disrupts the normally atheroprotective actions of high density lipoprotein (HDL), therefore, we compared ACEI or ARB treatment on HDL functions in MHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: HDL was isolated at the starting point (pre) and 3-6 months later (post) in 30 MHD randomly assigned to placebo, ramipril or valsartan. Outcomes included cholesterol efflux, inflammatory cytokine response, effects on Toll-like receptors (TLR), superoxide production, methylarginine and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. HDL from ARB- or ACEI-treated subjects was more effective in maintaining efflux than HDL of placebo. HDL from ARB- or ACEI-treated subjects but not placebo lessened cellular superoxide production. In contrast, neither ARB nor ACEI improved HDL anti-inflammatory effect. Indeed, HDL of ACEI-treated subjects potentiated the cytokine responses in association with activation of TLR but did not alter the HDL content of methylarginines or SAA. CONCLUSION: Both ACEI and ARB stabilized HDL cholesterol acceptor function and sustained cellular anti-oxidative effects but not anti-inflammatory effects, and ACEI-treatment instead amplified the HDL inflammatory response. The findings reveal possible utility of antagonizing angiotensin actions in MDH and suggest a possible mechanism for superiority of ARB vs ACEI in the setting of advanced kidney disease.
Authors: C Zoccali; S Bode-Böger; F Mallamaci; F Benedetto; G Tripepi; L Malatino; A Cataliotti; I Bellanuova; I Fermo; J Frölich; R Böger Journal: Lancet Date: 2001 Dec 22-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Chantal Kopecky; Bernd Genser; Christiane Drechsler; Vera Krane; Christopher C Kaltenecker; Markus Hengstschläger; Winfried März; Christoph Wanner; Marcus D Säemann; Thomas Weichhart Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Kevin E Chan; T Alp Ikizler; Jorge L Gamboa; Chang Yu; Raymond M Hakim; Nancy J Brown Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: David J Kennedy; W H Wilson Tang; Yiying Fan; Yuping Wu; Shirley Mann; Michael Pepoy; Stanley L Hazen Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jelena Kornej; Petra Büttner; Erik Holzwirth; Tina Fischer-Schaepmann; Danilo Obradovic; Mirjam von Lucadou; Edzard Schwedhelm; Günter Daum; Gerhard Hindricks; Gunther Marsche; Markus Trieb; Holger Thiele Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 2.037