Literature DB >> 29690825

A service evaluation comparing home-based testing to clinic-based testing for Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in Birmingham and Solihull.

Prita Banerjee1, Nicola Thorley1, Keith Radcliffe1.   

Abstract

Home-based testing is an alternative, convenient and cost-effective method of testing for sexually transmitted infections compared to traditional clinic-based testing, in patients who are asymptomatic and, or, would otherwise feel stigmatised about attending sexual health clinics. The sexual health service in Birmingham and Solihull, called Umbrella, provides an online home-based testing service, which has been in operation since August 2015. The aim of this study was to evaluate the uptake and return rate of home-based testing kits and compare home-based testing to clinic-based testing in terms of diagnosis and treatment rates of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC). Our study showed that home-based testing is a popular method of testing and relatively more popular amongst asymptomatic, young, heterosexual female and White patients than clinic-based testing, with a return rate of 48%. The diagnosis rates for CT/GC are comparable to patients who attend clinic for testing (8% vs. 10% in home-based and clinic-based groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The overall treatment rate was lower in the home-based compared to the clinic-based group (82% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). Umbrella will continue to provide this service within Birmingham and Solihull and aim to provide patients with alternative pathways for more convenient access to treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydia; Diagnosis; STI screening; gonorrhoea

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29690825     DOI: 10.1177/0956462418767180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Infectious Diseases Testing Outside Clinics: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eneyi E Kpokiri; Gifty Marley; Weiming Tang; Noah Fongwen; Dan Wu; Sima Berendes; Bhavana Ambil; Sarah-Jane Loveday; Ranga Sampath; Jennifer S Walker; Joseph K B Matovu; Catharina Boehme; Nitika Pant Pai; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.835

2.  Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Tommer Spence; Inès Kander; Julia Walsh; Frances Griffiths; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Utilisation of pharmacy-based sexual and reproductive health services: a quantitative retrospective study.

Authors:  Julia Gauly; Helen Atherton; Peter K Kimani; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.519

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.