| Literature DB >> 29690612 |
Saba Khalilpour1, Ghazaleh Behnammanesh2, Fouad Suede3, Mohammed O Ezzat4, Jayadhisan Muniandy5, Yasser Tabana6,7, Mohamed Khadeer Ahamed8, Ali Tamayol9, Amin Malik Shah Majid10,11,12, Enrico Sangiovanni13, Mario Dell'Agli14, Aman Shah Majid15,16.
Abstract
Modulating oxidative stresses and inflammation can potentially prevent or alleviate the pathological conditions of diseases associated with the nervous system, including ischemic optic neuropathy. In this study we evaluated the anti-neuroinflammatory and neuroprotective activities of Rhus coriaria (R. coriaria) extract in vivo. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for DPPH, ABTS and β⁻carotene were 6.79 ± 0.009 µg/mL, 10.94 ± 0.09 µg/mL, and 6.25 ± 0.06 µg/mL, respectively. Retinal ischemia was induced by optic nerve crush injury in albino Balb/c mice. The anti-inflammatory activity of ethanolic extract of R. coriaria (ERC) and linoleic acid (LA) on ocular ischemia was monitored using Fluorescence Molecular Tomography (FMT). Following optic nerve crush injury, the mice treated with 400 mg/kg of ERC and LA exhibited an 84.87% and 86.71% reduction of fluorescent signal (cathepsin activity) respectively. The results of this study provide strong scientific evidence for the neuroprotective activity of the ERC, identifying LA as one of the main components responsible for the effect. ERC may be useful and worthy of further development for its adjunctive utilization in the treatment of optic neuropathy.Entities:
Keywords: Rhus coriaria; anti-neuroinflammation; ischemic optic neuropathy; linoleic acid; neuroprotection
Year: 2018 PMID: 29690612 PMCID: PMC6027176 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines6020048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1(a) Free radical scavenging activity of the ethanol extract of R. coriaria measured by ABTS assay. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3); (b) effects of the R. coriaria ethanol extract on DPPH scavenging activity; (c) results of the β-carotene bleaching assay of the R. coriaria ethanol extract; (d) GC-MS chromatogram of the R. coriaria ethanol extract.
Phytochemical contents of the R. coriaria ethanol extract (ERC). The data are means ± SEM (n = 3).
| Test Sample | Total Phenolics (µg GAE/g) | Total Flavonoids (µg QE/g) |
|---|---|---|
| ERC | 9353 ± 83 | 1393 ± 32 |
GC-MS screening of the phytochemicals present in the R. coriaria ethanol extract.
| Peak | Compound | Ref | Quality | Peak Height | R.T. Min | % Area | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | Tricosane | 114376 | 99 | 1,192,748 | 11.118 | 2.65% | 1408.8 |
| b | Heptacosane | 113306 | 99 | 826,548 | 11.16 | 1.87% | 1496.4 |
| c | Nonacosane | 116666 | 98 | 451,294 | 11.229 | 1.03% | 1632.8 |
| d | Octadecane | 106289 | 95 | 680,873 | 11.514 | 7.85% | 2195 |
| e | Campesterol | 130016 | 97 | 5,389,423 | 11.944 | 9.32% | 2298.8 |
| f | 8,11-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester | 136481 | 97 | 607,878 | 12.361 | 1.10% | 2398.4 |
| g | γ-Sitosterol | 136487 | 98 | 6,507,080 | 12.777 | 11.95% | 2497.9 |
| h | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester | 91035 | 96 | 331,695 | 13.235 | 0.90% | 2599.5 |
| i | Linoleicacid (LA) (9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-) | 151555 | 99 | 5,171,060 | 13.756 | 12.39% | 2697.9 |
| j | Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol | 158131 | 99 | 2,634,496 | 15.054 | 8.95% | 2945.6 |
Figure 2Fluorescence molecular tomography images without the region of interest (ROI). In this figure, the ROI area was not selected, but the differences in fluorescence intensities between the negative control (b) and the treated groups (c–e) is obvious. The negative control was the animal with induced ischemia at the left optic nerve/eye. The untreated normal animal was used as the positive/normal control (a). ProSens 750 was used as the inflammatory (cathepsin) fluorescent probe. In the group treated with 400 mg/kg body weight of ERC (d) and LA (e), the cathepsin fluorescence signal was significantly lower than that of the negative control.
Figure 3Fluorescence molecular tomography images with the region of interest (ROI). The ROI proximal to the eye area was selected to focus on the ischemic eye. In the negative control (b), the fluorescence signal was very intense (white arrow), whereas, in the treated ischemic eyes, treatment with LA (e) and different concentrations of ERC (c,d) reduced the fluorescence signal of the ROI. The image of the normal/positive control was used as the background.
Figure 4Graphical representation of the intensity of the fluorescence signal generated after induction of ischemia. Animals treated with ERC and LA exhibited a significant reduction in the ischemia-induced signal compared to the untreated group (control). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3), * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01.
Comparison of fluorescence intensity (mm2) and % of ischemia inhibition in treated and control groups.
| Test | Fluorescenceintensity (mm2) (Mean) | SEM | % Inhibition Ofischemia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 69.66 | 48.56 | — |
| Ischemia (negative control) | 659.32 | 123.57 | — |
| ERC 200 mg/kg | 253.56 | 57.64 | 61.54 |
| ERC 400 mg/kg | 99.30 | 40.28 | 84.87 |
| LA 400 mg/kg | 87.20 | 50.12 | 86.71 |