| Literature DB >> 29690593 |
Catherine A Lippi1,2, Anna M Stewart-Ibarra3, Ángel G Muñoz4,5, Mercy J Borbor-Cordova6, Raúl Mejía7, Keytia Rivero8, Katty Castillo9, Washington B Cárdenas10, Sadie J Ryan11,12.
Abstract
Dengue fever, a mosquito-borne arbovirus, is a major public health concern in Ecuador. In this study, we aimed to describe the spatial distribution of dengue risk and identify local social-ecological factors associated with an outbreak of dengue fever in the city of Guayaquil, Ecuador. We examined georeferenced dengue cases (n = 4248) and block-level census data variables to identify social-ecological risk factors associated with the presence/absence and burden of dengue in Guayaquil in 2012. Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), specifically Anselin’s Local Moran’s I, and Moran’s I tests were used to locate hotspots of dengue transmission, and multimodel selection was used to identify covariates associated with dengue presence and burden at the census block level. We identified significant dengue transmission hotspots near the North Central and Southern portions of Guayaquil. Significant risk factors for presence of dengue included poor housing conditions, access to paved roads, and receipt of remittances. Counterintuitive positive correlations with dengue presence were observed with several municipal services such as garbage collection and access to piped water. Risk factors for increased burden of dengue included poor housing conditions, garbage collection, receipt of remittances, and sharing a property with more than one household. Social factors such as education and household demographics were negatively correlated with increased dengue burden. These findings elucidate underlying differences with dengue presence versus burden, and suggest that vulnerability and risk maps could be developed to inform dengue prevention and control; this is information that is also relevant for emerging epidemics of chikungunya and Zika viruses.Entities:
Keywords: Ecuador; climate; dengue fever; ecology; geography; risk factors; spatial analysis; temporal
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29690593 PMCID: PMC5923869 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Annual number of reported cases of dengue fever in Guayaquil, Ecuador (2000–2012) (A). Cases of dengue fever per census zone in Guayaquil during the 2012 outbreak (B).
Figure 2The study site, Guayaquil, is located within Guayas province in coastal Ecuador. (Panel A) shows the location of Ecuador (medium green) in S. America (bright green); (Panel B) shows the location of Guayaquil (dark orange) within Guayas Province (warm yellow), in Ecuador; (Panel C) shows the city of Guayaquil, detailing the census block structural layout, and showing where major and minor waterways exist surrounding the city limits.
Figure 3Climate seasonality and dengue cases in Guayaquil, Ecuador. The bold red line shows the monthly mean temperature from 2000–2012 in comparison with monthly mean temperature for 2012 (red dashed line). The dark blue shading shows the monthly mean rainfall from 2000–2012 in comparison with monthly mean rainfall for 2012 (light blue shading). The red bars show monthly totals of confirmed dengue cases from 2012.
Socio-ecological parameters tested in logistic regression and negative binomial model searches to respectively predict presence of dengue and severity of the outbreak.
| Parameter | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Housing conditions | ||
| House condition index (HCI), 0 to 1, where 1 is poor condition | 0.27 | 0.12 |
| More than four people per bedroom | 16.78% | 0.08 |
| People per household | 3.88 | 0.34 |
| Municipal garbage collection | 93.06% | 0.15 |
| People in household drink tap water | 76.85% | 0.09 |
| Piped water inside the home | 77.03% | 0.31 |
| Municipal sewage | 62.52% | 0.39 |
| Access to paved roads | 80.06% | 0.25 |
| More than one household per structure | 1.90% | 0.01 |
| Unoccupied households | 16.08% | 0.56 |
| Rental homes | 1.55% | 0.17 |
|
| ||
| Receive remittances | 8.85% | 0.04 |
| People emigrate for work | 1.88% | 0.01 |
| Mean age of the head of the household (years) | 45.69 | 4.54 |
| Mean household age (years) | 29.36 | 4.29 |
| Proportion of household under 15 years of age | 28.34% | 0.06 |
| Proportion of household under 5 years of age | 9.31% | 0.03 |
| Head of the household has primary education or less | 30.94% | 0.15 |
| Head of household has secondary education | 31.73% | 0.07 |
| Head of household has post-secondary education | 25.77% | 0.21 |
| Afro-Ecuadorian | 10.13% | 0.07 |
| Head of the household is unemployed | 26.84% | 0.06 |
| Head of the household is a woman | 33.29% | 0.04 |
Figure 4Anselin’s Local Moran’s I analysis for the 2012 Guayaquil outbreak. Cases of dengue were significantly clustered in the North Central and Southern areas of the city.
Top logistic regression model used in determining which social-ecological factors are important to dengue presence.
| Model | Estimate | 95% CI | SE | AICc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 3.84 | 0.54–7.25 | 1.71 | 369.85 | 0.03 |
| House condition | 24.55 | 17.62–32.11 | 3.69 | <0.001 | |
| Proportion of Afro-Ecuadorians | −9.69 | −15.72–−3.76 | 3.04 | 0.001 | |
| Municipal garbage collection | 4.70 | 2.27–7.37 | 1.29 | <0.001 | |
| Piped water | 3.50 | 1.38–5.72 | 1.10 | 0.002 | |
| Municipal sewage | 2.04 | 0.44–3.62 | 0.81 | 0.012 | |
| Access by paved roads | −3.36 | −6.36–−0.54 | 1.48 | 0.023 | |
| Drink tap water | −10.74 | −16.53–−5.28 | 2.86 | <0.001 | |
| Remittance | 23.20 | 10.83–36.15 | 6.44 | <0.001 |
Top negative binomial model used in determining which social-ecological factors are important to dengue burden.
| Model | Estimate | 95% CI | SE | AICc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.04 | −4.09–6.25 | 2.54 | 2920.67 | 0.682 |
| House condition | 10.95 | 6.77–15.13 | 2.09 | <0.001 | |
| Postsecondary education | −2.53 | −4.72–−0.34 | 1.07 | 0.018 | |
| Primary education | −5.11 | −8.52–−1.71 | 1.62 | 0.002 | |
| Proportion of Afro-Ecuadorians | −4.23 | −6.43–−1.94 | 1.25 | <0.001 | |
| Proportion of household members under 15 | −9.02 | −15.58–−2.50 | 3.46 | 0.009 | |
| Head of household age | −0.12 | −0.19–−0.05 | 0.03 | <0.001 | |
| Municipal garbage collection | 2.82 | 1.77–3.87 | 0.61 | <0.001 | |
| More than 1 household per structure | 7.57 | −4.66–20.03 | 6.26 | 0.227 | |
| Remittance | 4.76 | −1.27–10.87 | 3.07 | 0.121 |
Figure 5Conceptual diagrams highlighting the census variable suites that significantly affected dengue presence (A) and dengue burden (B) in Guayaquil, Ecuador during the 2012 outbreak.
Figure 6Population density (people per km2) of census zones in Guayaquil (A) shown against the proportion of homes lacking municipal garbage collection (B); lacking municipal sewage (C); and lacking piped water (D). Although dengue cases were reported in both densely and sparsely populated census zones, dengue hot spots were more associated with higher density zones (Figure 1), and the proportion of homes that lack basic municipal services tends to be higher in zones with lower population density. This may account for the counterintuitive model estimates associated with lack of these services (Table 2 and Table 3).