| Literature DB >> 29689762 |
Fulong Ren1,2, Peng Cao1,2, Dazhe Zhao1,2, Chao Wan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the severe complication of diabetic retinopathy causing severe vision loss and leads to blindness in severe cases if left untreated.Entities:
Keywords: Retinal images; classification; diabetic macular edema; exudate detection
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29689762 PMCID: PMC6004946 DOI: 10.3233/THC-174704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Health Care ISSN: 0928-7329 Impact factor: 1.285
Criterion for grading of diabetic macular edema
| Grade | Grading criterion | Class |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No visible exudates | Normal |
| 1 | Shortest distance between macula and exudates | Non-CSME |
| 2 | Shortest distance between macula and exudates | CSME |
Figure 1.The flowchart of the proposed algorithm for grading DME.
Figure 2.An example of the proposed procedure. (a) Original image, (b) the green channel image, (c) outputs of main vessel segmentation, (d) OD localization and defection, (e) macula localization and coordinates, (f) outputs of exudate candidates, (g) outputs of exudate classification, (h) the final outputs of exudate in RGB image.
Figure 3.The procedure of the exudate candidates’ identification.
Figure 4.Examples of macular edema detection for MESSIDOR database. (a) and (b): Original and result of exudate detection and macular coordinates images of a non-CSME example, (c) and (d): Original and result of exudate detection and macular coordinates images of a CSME example, the detected exudates are labelled in green.
The comparison among different lp using the proposed method for the DME grading on MESSIDOR dataset
| lp | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 0.889 | 0.797 | 0.915 | 0.786 |
| 40% | 0.912 | 0.842 | 0.931 | 0.831 |
| 60% | 0.945 | 0.894 | 0.958 | 0.887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100% | 0.927 | 0.865 | 0.943 | 0.855 |
The comparison among the state-of-the-art semi-supervised classifiers and DME grading methods on MESSIDOR dataset
| Method | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neural network | 0.909 | 0.830 | 0.931 | 0.820 |
| Self-training [ | 0.951 | 0.894 | 0.961 | 0.891 |
| Co-training [ | 0.960 | 0.890 | 0.960 | 0.879 |
| Lim et al. [ | 0.852 | 0.809 | 0.902 | Not reported |
| Sreejini and Govindan [ | 0.945 | 0.91 | 0.98 | Not reported |
| Akram et al. [ | 0.973 | 0.926 | 0.978 | Not reported |
| Proposed |
|
|
|
|