Urim Lee1, Chi Heon Kim2, Chun Kee Chung3, Yunhee Choi4, Seung Heon Yang5, Sung Bae Park6, Sung Hwan Hwang5, Jong-Myung Jung5, Kyoung-Tae Kim7. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Human Brain Function Laboratory, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: chiheon1@snu.ac.kr. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Human Brain Function Laboratory, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Borame Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cervical radiculopathy infrequently presents with motor weakness. Motor weakness was improved in >90% of patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PECF) is an alternative surgical technique, but the outcome of motor weakness has not been reported. Our objective was to demonstrate the longitudinal outcomes of motor weakness after PECF. METHODS: A retrospective review of 106 consecutive patients was performed. Preoperative motor weakness was graded as mild (IV/V strength) or severe (less than III/V strength). The patients visited the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and yearly thereafter. Improvement was defined as an improved weakness of more than 1 grade, and normalization was defined as the recovery of complete motor strength. RESULTS: Motor weakness preoperatively presented in 76 of 106 (72%) patients (49%, mild weakness; 23%, severe weakness). After PECF, the weakness improved in 72 of 76 (95%) patients and normalized in 65 of 76 (86%) patients. In the patients with mild weakness, the normalization rates were 48%, 81%, 90%, and 96% at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12, respectively. In the patients with severe weakness, the improvement rates were 50%, 71%, 83%, 88%, and 92%, and the normalization rates were 8%, 38%, 58%, 58%, and 63% at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative motor weakness was improved in 95% of the patients after PECF, but motor weakness was not normalized in 37% of the patients with severe weakness.
OBJECTIVE: Cervical radiculopathy infrequently presents with motor weakness. Motor weakness was improved in >90% of patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PECF) is an alternative surgical technique, but the outcome of motor weakness has not been reported. Our objective was to demonstrate the longitudinal outcomes of motor weakness after PECF. METHODS: A retrospective review of 106 consecutive patients was performed. Preoperative motor weakness was graded as mild (IV/V strength) or severe (less than III/V strength). The patients visited the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and yearly thereafter. Improvement was defined as an improved weakness of more than 1 grade, and normalization was defined as the recovery of complete motor strength. RESULTS:Motor weakness preoperatively presented in 76 of 106 (72%) patients (49%, mild weakness; 23%, severe weakness). After PECF, the weakness improved in 72 of 76 (95%) patients and normalized in 65 of 76 (86%) patients. In the patients with mild weakness, the normalization rates were 48%, 81%, 90%, and 96% at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12, respectively. In the patients with severe weakness, the improvement rates were 50%, 71%, 83%, 88%, and 92%, and the normalization rates were 8%, 38%, 58%, 58%, and 63% at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative motor weakness was improved in 95% of the patients after PECF, but motor weakness was not normalized in 37% of the patients with severe weakness.