B J R Buckley1, D H J Thijssen1,2, R C Murphy1, L E F Graves1, G Whyte1, F B Gillison3, D Crone4, P M Wilson5, P M Watson1. 1. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. 2. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen GA, Netherlands. 3. Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK. 4. School of Health and Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK. 5. Behavioural Health Sciences Research Lab, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Background: Translational research is required to ensure exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are evidence-based and reflect local needs. This article reports process data from the co-development phase of an ERS, providing an insight into (i) factors that must be considered when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting, and (ii) challenges and facilitators of conducting participatory research involving multiple stakeholders. Methods: An ERS was iteratively co-developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group (commissioners, managers, practitioners, patients and academics) via five participatory meetings and an online survey. Audio data (e.g. group discussions) and visual data (e.g. whiteboard notes) were recorded and analysed using NVivo-10 electronic software. Results: Factors to consider when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting included (i) current ERS culture; (ii) skills, safety and accountability; and (iii) resources and capacity. The co-development process was facilitated by needs-analysis, open questions, multidisciplinary debate and reflective practice. Challenges included contrasting views, irregular attendance and (mis)perceptions of evaluation. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary co-development process highlighted cultural and pragmatic issues related to exercise referral provision, resulting in an evidence-based intervention framework designed to be implemented within existing infrastructures. Further work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-developed intervention in practice.
Background: Translational research is required to ensure exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are evidence-based and reflect local needs. This article reports process data from the co-development phase of an ERS, providing an insight into (i) factors that must be considered when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting, and (ii) challenges and facilitators of conducting participatory research involving multiple stakeholders. Methods: An ERS was iteratively co-developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group (commissioners, managers, practitioners, patients and academics) via five participatory meetings and an online survey. Audio data (e.g. group discussions) and visual data (e.g. whiteboard notes) were recorded and analysed using NVivo-10 electronic software. Results: Factors to consider when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting included (i) current ERS culture; (ii) skills, safety and accountability; and (iii) resources and capacity. The co-development process was facilitated by needs-analysis, open questions, multidisciplinary debate and reflective practice. Challenges included contrasting views, irregular attendance and (mis)perceptions of evaluation. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary co-development process highlighted cultural and pragmatic issues related to exercise referral provision, resulting in an evidence-based intervention framework designed to be implemented within existing infrastructures. Further work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-developed intervention in practice.
Authors: James Steele; Matthew Wade; Robert J Copeland; Stuart Stokes; Rachel Stokes; Steven Mann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Caroline J Dodd-Reynolds; Dimitris Vallis; Adetayo Kasim; Nasima Akhter; Coral L Hanson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Benjamin J R Buckley; Stephanie J Finnie; Rebecca C Murphy; Paula M Watson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anja Weissenfels; Wolfgang Geidl; Eriselda Mino; Inga Naber; Sarah Klamroth; Peter Gelius; Karim Abu-Omar; Klaus Pfeifer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Thomas D Griffiths; Diane Crone; Mike Stembridge; Rachel N Lord Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Karim Abu-Omar; Anja Weissenfels; Eriselda Mino; Inga Naber; Sarah Klamroth; Wolfgang Geidl; Klaus Pfeifer Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Helen Smith; Luke Budworth; Chloe Grindey; Isabel Hague; Natalie Hamer; Roman Kislov; Peter van der Graaf; Joe Langley Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2022-04-02
Authors: Benjamin Jr Buckley; Dick Hj Thijssen; Rebecca C Murphy; Lee Ef Graves; Madeleine Cochrane; Fiona Gillison; Diane Crone; Philip M Wilson; Greg Whyte; Paula M Watson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 2.692