Chris P Verschoor1,2, Hala Tamim3. 1. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 2. McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, Ontario, Canada. 3. School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a complex pathophysiological phenomenon that will impact a significant proportion of adults over the age of 65 and contributes to the risk of several adverse health outcomes. Although women have a disproportionately higher risk of frailty, the sex-specific factors related to this syndrome are not well described. Hence, we sought to examine the relationship of age at menopause, hysterectomy status, and hormone replacement therapy use with prevalent frailty in older women. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Baseline Comprehensive Cohort (n = 30,097, 45-85 years old). Frailty was operationalized using both the deficit accumulation (frailty index) and frailty phenotype (Fried) models. Postmenopausal women were categorized as follows: premature (30-39 years), early (40-45 years), normal (46-54 years), and late (55+ years) menopause, or hysterectomy. Associations were determined using multivariate analysis, adjusting for sociodemographics, lifestyle factors, social support, and hormone replacement therapy use. RESULTS: Age at menopause was inversely related to frailty in older Canadian women. The frailty index decreased 1.2% of the mean (p < .001) with every year of menopause onset and was significantly higher for women in the premature (24%; p < .001) and early (7%; p < .01) menopause and hysterectomy (21%; p < .001) groups, compared to the normal menopause group. The odds for being classified as frail using Fried's criteria was higher for the premature menopause (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.72-2.27) and hysterectomy (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.25-2.02) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports a role for age at menopause and hysterectomy in the risk of frailty in older women and warrants further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a complex pathophysiological phenomenon that will impact a significant proportion of adults over the age of 65 and contributes to the risk of several adverse health outcomes. Although women have a disproportionately higher risk of frailty, the sex-specific factors related to this syndrome are not well described. Hence, we sought to examine the relationship of age at menopause, hysterectomy status, and hormone replacement therapy use with prevalent frailty in older women. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Baseline Comprehensive Cohort (n = 30,097, 45-85 years old). Frailty was operationalized using both the deficit accumulation (frailty index) and frailty phenotype (Fried) models. Postmenopausal women were categorized as follows: premature (30-39 years), early (40-45 years), normal (46-54 years), and late (55+ years) menopause, or hysterectomy. Associations were determined using multivariate analysis, adjusting for sociodemographics, lifestyle factors, social support, and hormone replacement therapy use. RESULTS: Age at menopause was inversely related to frailty in older Canadian women. The frailty index decreased 1.2% of the mean (p < .001) with every year of menopause onset and was significantly higher for women in the premature (24%; p < .001) and early (7%; p < .01) menopause and hysterectomy (21%; p < .001) groups, compared to the normal menopause group. The odds for being classified as frail using Fried's criteria was higher for the premature menopause (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.72-2.27) and hysterectomy (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.25-2.02) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports a role for age at menopause and hysterectomy in the risk of frailty in older women and warrants further investigation.
Authors: Chris P Verschoor; Daniel W Belsky; Jinhui Ma; Alan A Cohen; Lauren E Griffith; Parminder Raina Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jazmin A Cole; Mackenzie N Kehmeier; Bradley R Bedell; Sahana Krishna Kumaran; Grant D Henson; Ashley E Walker Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Chris P Verschoor; David T S Lin; Michael S Kobor; Oxana Mian; Jinhui Ma; Guillaume Pare; Gustavo Ybazeta Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Maria P Velez; Beatriz E Alvarado; Nicole Rosendaal; Saionara M da Câmara; Emmanuelle Belanger; Harriet Richardson; Catherine M Pirkle Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: K Lockhart Jamieson; Ahmed M Darwesh; Deanna K Sosnowski; Hao Zhang; Saumya Shah; Pavel Zhabyeyev; Jun Yang; Bruce D Hammock; Matthew L Edin; Darryl C Zeldin; Gavin Y Oudit; Zamaneh Kassiri; John M Seubert Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 5.923