Literature DB >> 29688312

A prospective 5-year follow-up after population-based systematic screening for atrial fibrillation.

Johan Engdahl1, Anders Holmén2, Mårten Rosenqvist1, Ulf Strömberg3.   

Abstract

Aims: Thrombo-embolic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) is significantly reduced with oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. Atrial fibrillation is often asymptomatic (silent) and therefore undiagnosed. The long-term course of silent AF as well as OAC treatment adherence after AF screening is not known. We aim at studying long-term adherence to OAC treatment, AF symptoms, and stroke incidence on population level after systematic AF screening. Methods and results: All inhabitants in a Swedish municipality who were born in 1934 and 1935 (n = 1335) were invited to participate in an AF screening trial between 2010 and 2012. Participants with a previously known or screening-detected AF were invited to a 5-year follow-up. Time trends of ischaemic stroke incidence were compared for population groups residing in the intervention municipality and in a surrounding control area where no AF screening trial was carried out. After the screening procedure, 103 of 121 participants (85%) with AF were treated with OAC. At the follow-up examination, 94 of 106 living patients (88%) were still on OAC treatment. Among the 23 long-term surviving patients who were diagnosed with paroxysmal AF during screening, 6 had developed permanent silent AF. The incidence of ischaemic stroke between ages 76-80 years declined significantly after the AF screening trial in the intervention area (P = 0.003) but not in the control area.
Conclusion: Adherence to OAC treatment 5 years after AF screening was high. Silent AF has a natural course similar to symptomatic AF. The observed incidences of ischaemic stroke suggest a beneficial population-level effect of systematic AF screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29688312     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  6 in total

1.  Atrial fibrillation: time for active case finding.

Authors:  John Robson; Richard Schilling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Large-scale screening studies for atrial fibrillation - is it worth the effort?

Authors:  J Engdahl; M Rosenqvist
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Atrial fibrillation detected at screening is not a benign condition: outcomes in screen-detected versus clinically detected atrial fibrillation. Results from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) study.

Authors:  Victor W Zwartkruis; Bastiaan Geelhoed; Navin Suthahar; Stephan J L Bakker; Ron T Gansevoort; Isabelle C van Gelder; Rudolf A de Boer; Michiel Rienstra
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-12

4.  Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in American Indian Adults in a Tribal Primary Care Clinic.

Authors:  Stavros Stavrakis; Khaled Elkholey; Marty M Lofgren; Zain U A Asad; Lancer D Stephens; Ben Freedman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Long-term blood pressure trajectories and incident atrial fibrillation in women and men: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Ekaterina Sharashova; Tom Wilsgaard; Jocasta Ball; Bente Morseth; Eva Gerdts; Laila A Hopstock; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Henrik Schirmer; Maja-Lisa Løchen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Validity of daily self-pulse palpation for atrial fibrillation screening in patients 65 years and older: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Faris Ghazal; Holger Theobald; Mårten Rosenqvist; Faris Al-Khalili
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.