Literature DB >> 29687467

Estimating lead-time bias in lung cancer diagnosis of patients with previous cancers.

Zhiyun Ge1,2, Daniel F Heitjan1,2, David E Gerber3,4, Lei Xuan2, Sandi L Pruitt2,3.   

Abstract

Surprisingly, survival from a diagnosis of lung cancer has been found to be longer for those who experienced a previous cancer than for those with no previous cancer. A possible explanation is lead-time bias, which, by advancing the time of diagnosis, apparently extends survival among those with a previous cancer even when they enjoy no real clinical advantage. We propose a discrete parametric model to jointly describe survival in a no-previous-cancer group (where, by definition, lead-time bias cannot exist) and in a previous-cancer group (where lead-time bias is possible). We model the lead time with a negative binomial distribution and the post-lead-time survival with a linear spline on the logit hazard scale, which allows for survival to differ between groups even in the absence of bias; we denote our model Logit-Spline/Negative Binomial. We fit Logit-Spline/Negative Binomial to a propensity-score matched subset of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data set, conducting sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of key assumptions. With lung cancer-specific death as the end point, the estimated mean lead time is roughly 11 months for stage I&II patients; with overall survival, it is roughly 3.4 months in stage I&II. For patients with higher-stage lung cancers, the mean lead time is 1 month or less for both outcomes. Accounting for lead-time bias reduces the survival advantage of the previous-cancer group when one exists, but it does not nullify it in all cases.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; cancer survivorship; convolution; discrete survival distribution; spline

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29687467      PMCID: PMC8265914          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  18 in total

1.  Estimation of post-lead-time survival under dependence between lead-time and post-lead-time survival.

Authors:  J L Xu; R M Fagerstrom; P C Prorok
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sojourn time and lead time projection in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Dongfeng Wu; Diane Erwin; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: A national SEER-medicare analysis.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Andrew L Laccetti; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Estimating lead time and sensitivity in a screening program without estimating the incidence in the screened group.

Authors:  H Straatman; P G Peer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Non-parametric estimation of the post-lead-time survival distribution of screen-detected cancer cases.

Authors:  J L Xu; P C Prorok
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.

Authors:  N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Multiple independent primary cancers do not adversely affect survival of the lung cancer patient.

Authors:  Rafael Aguiló; Francesc Macià; Miquel Porta; Montserrat Casamitjana; Joan Minguella; Ana Maria Novoa
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Rob Boer; Suzie J Otto; Ingrid W van der Cruijsen; Ronald A M Damhuis; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of cancer screening and residing in a coal-polluted East Asian region with overall survival of lung cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Runxiang Yang; Ming He; Dongmei Wang; Rongrong Ye; Lu Li; Rouyu Deng; Mohsin Shah; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Cancer cases detected in the prevention and control service of a private cancer clinic in Peru.

Authors:  José Revilla-López; Andrea Anampa-Guzmán; Luis Casanova Marquez; Katrina Weeks; Suzanne Pollard; Adriel Olórtegui-Yzú; María Ruiz-Velazco; Alba Davila-Edquen; Daniel Castro-Dorer; Juan Wong-Barrenechea; Jossira Abad-Seminario; Pamela Gonzáles-Ramos; Fiorella Rivera-Sandoval; Carlos Carracedo-Gonzáles
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.965

3.  Circular RNA circZFR promotes tumorigenic capacity of lung cancer via CCND1.

Authors:  Guanjun Ren; Qiuhong Zhao; Chunliang Yan; Qishan Xue; Li Zhang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.