David Michael Levine1,2, Ronald F Dixon3,4,5,6, Jeffrey A Linder7. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. dmlevine@bwh.hardvard.edu. 2. Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. dmlevine@bwh.hardvard.edu. 3. Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal management of hypertension requires frequent monitoring and follow-up. Novel, pragmatic interventions have the potential to engage patients, maintain blood pressure control, and enhance access to busy primary care practices. "Virtual visits" are structured asynchronous online interactions between a patient and a clinician to extend medical care beyond the initial office visit. OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure control and healthcare utilization between patients who received virtual visits compared to usual hypertension care. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study with adjustment by difference-in-differences. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care patients with hypertension. EXPOSURE: Patient participation in at least one virtual visit for hypertension. Usual care patients did not use a virtual visit but were seen in-person for hypertension. MAIN MEASURES: Adjusted difference in mean systolic blood pressure, primary care office visits, specialist office visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient admissions in the 180 days before and 180 days after the in-person visit. KEY RESULTS: Of the 1051 virtual visit patients and 24,848 usual care patients, we propensity score-matched 893 patients from each group. Both groups were approximately 61 years old, 44% female, 85% White, had about five chronic conditions, and about 20% had a mean pre-visit systolic blood pressure of 140-160 mmHg. Compared to usual care, virtual visit patients had an adjusted 0.8 (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2) fewer primary care office visits. There was no significant adjusted difference in systolic blood pressure control (0.6 mmHg [95% CI, - 2.0 to 3.1]), specialist visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, - 0.3 to 0.3]), emergency department visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.01]), or inpatient admissions (0.0 more admissions [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with reasonably well-controlled hypertension, virtual visit participation was associated with equivalent blood pressure control and reduced in-office primary care utilization.
BACKGROUND: Optimal management of hypertension requires frequent monitoring and follow-up. Novel, pragmatic interventions have the potential to engage patients, maintain blood pressure control, and enhance access to busy primary care practices. "Virtual visits" are structured asynchronous online interactions between a patient and a clinician to extend medical care beyond the initial office visit. OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure control and healthcare utilization between patients who received virtual visits compared to usual hypertension care. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study with adjustment by difference-in-differences. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care patients with hypertension. EXPOSURE: Patient participation in at least one virtual visit for hypertension. Usual care patients did not use a virtual visit but were seen in-person for hypertension. MAIN MEASURES: Adjusted difference in mean systolic blood pressure, primary care office visits, specialist office visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient admissions in the 180 days before and 180 days after the in-person visit. KEY RESULTS: Of the 1051 virtual visit patients and 24,848 usual care patients, we propensity score-matched 893 patients from each group. Both groups were approximately 61 years old, 44% female, 85% White, had about five chronic conditions, and about 20% had a mean pre-visit systolic blood pressure of 140-160 mmHg. Compared to usual care, virtual visit patients had an adjusted 0.8 (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2) fewer primary care office visits. There was no significant adjusted difference in systolic blood pressure control (0.6 mmHg [95% CI, - 2.0 to 3.1]), specialist visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, - 0.3 to 0.3]), emergency department visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.01]), or inpatient admissions (0.0 more admissions [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with reasonably well-controlled hypertension, virtual visit participation was associated with equivalent blood pressure control and reduced in-office primary care utilization.
Authors: Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: David T Liss; Robert J Reid; David Grembowski; Carolyn M Rutter; Tyler R Ross; Paul A Fishman Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Hude Quan; Nadia Khan; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Karen Tu; Guanmin Chen; Norm Campbell; Michael D Hill; William A Ghali; Finlay A McAlister Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Richard A Goodman; Samuel F Posner; Elbert S Huang; Anand K Parekh; Howard K Koh Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Oliver T Nguyen; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Jinhai Huo; Karim Hanna; Christopher M Shea; Kea Turner Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Natalie S Lee; Rebecca Anastos-Wallen; Krisda H Chaiyachati; Catherine Reitz; David A Asch; Shivan J Mehta Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-01-04
Authors: Sanjai Sinha; Lisa M Kern; Laura F Gingras; Evgeniya Reshetnyak; Judy Tung; Fred Pelzman; Thomas A McGrath; Madeline R Sterling Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-09-17