| Literature DB >> 29686875 |
Saeko Takahashi1, Xu Chieko1, Tetsuya Sakai1, Shigemichi Hirose2, Morio Nakamura1.
Abstract
Nivolumab has been increasingly used for a range of malignancies, and a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported with its use. Nivolumab-induced sialadenitis (inflammation of salivary glands) and xerostomia (dry mouth) have been reported to occur in 0.03% and 0.05% respectively, but there have been no case reports published about these side effects. Sialadenitis is not a life-threatening irAEs, but xerostomia can become irreversible if not recognized and treated as it can otherwise lower quality of life and result in susceptibility to infection. Therefore, healthcare providers need to know about sialadenitis as one of the irAEs of Nivolumab. Thus, we present the first case of nivolumab-induced sialadenitis. A 70-year old man with pulmonary adenocarcinoma developed sialadenitis 4 months after initiating nivolumab. His serum amylase levels were elevated to 1373 IU/L, and a biopsy of his labial minor salivary glands showed severe lymphocytic inflammation with damage to the glands. His sialadenitis was improved by taking corticosteroids and by ceasing nivolumab.Entities:
Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitor; immune‐related adverse events; nivolumab; sialadenitis; xerostomia
Year: 2018 PMID: 29686875 PMCID: PMC5899999 DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respirol Case Rep ISSN: 2051-3380
Figure 1Seriate blood work results of amylase and CRP.
Figure 2(A) PET showed weak accumulation on the patient’s right parotid gland (arrow). (B) Salivary gland scintigraphy with 99mTc‐per‐ technetate revealed decreased accumulation. (C) Haematoxylin–eosin staining of lower lip tissue showing lymphocytes infiltration and destruction of glands (100×). (D) (400×).
Reported cases of xerostomia after use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
| Reference | Age | Gender | Type of malignancy | Cancer therapy | Time to onset of xerostomia after initiating ICI (months) | Treatment | irAE response to treatment | Antibodies results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 61 | M | NSCLC | Anti‐PD‐1 | 2 | Pilocarpine | Improved | ANA titre 320, SS‐A, SS‐B negative |
|
| 57 | M | Melanoma | Anti‐PD‐1, Anti‐CTLA‐4 | 2 | Prednisone 1 mg/kg/day cevimeline | No improvement | ANA titre 320, SS‐A, SS‐B negative |
|
| 74 | M | Melanoma | Anti‐CTLA‐4 | 8 | Prednisone 1 mg/kg/day | Improved | ANA titre 80, SS‐A, SS‐B negative |
|
| 74 | F | Melanoma | Anti‐PD‐1 | 8 | Prednisone 40 mg/day | Improved | ANA, SS‐A negative SS‐B positive |
|
| 56 | F | Renal carcinoma | Anti‐PD‐1, Anti‐CTLA‐4 | 3 | ICI withdrawn, symptomatic treatment | Improved | ANA titre 1280, SS‐A, SS‐B positive |
|
| 58 | F | Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix | Anti‐PD‐1 | 3 | Symptomatic treatment | Improved | ANA titre 160, SS‐A positive |
|
| 60 | M | Melanoma | Anti‐PD‐1, BRAF and MEK inhibitors | 2 | ICI withdrawn, prednisone | Improved | ANA titre 640, SS‐A negative before ICI use but positive after irAE occurred |
| Our case | 70 | M | NSCLC | Anti‐PD‐1 | 4 | ICI withdrawn, prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day, pilocarpine | Improved | ANA, SS‐A, SS‐B negative |