| Literature DB >> 29686841 |
Miao-Miao Ju1,2,3, Yi Fu2, Gui-Fang Zhao3, Cheng-Zhong He2, Zhong-Hu Li3, Bin Tian2,4.
Abstract
Southwest China is an important biodiversity hotspot. The interactions among the complex topography, climate change, and ecological factors in the dry-hot valley areas in southwest China may have profoundly affected the genetic structure of plant species in this region. In this study, we determined the effects of the Tanaka Line on genetic variation in the wild Bombax ceiba tree in southwest China. We sampled 224 individuals from 17 populations throughout the dry-hot valley regions. Six polymorphic expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat primers were employed to sequence the PCR products using the first-generation Sanger technique. The analysis based on population genetics suggested that B. ceiba exhibited a high level of gene diversity (HE: 0.2377-0.4775; I: 0.3997-0.7848). The 17 populations were divided into two groups by cluster analysis, which corresponded to geographic characters on each side of the Tanaka Line. In addition, a Mantel test indicated that the phylogeographic structure among the populations could be fitted to the isolation-by-distance model (r2 = .2553, p < .001). A barrier test indicated that there were obstacles among populations and between the two groups due to complex terrain isolation and geographic heterogeneity. We inferred that the Tanaka Line might have promoted the intraspecific phylogeographic subdivision and divergence of B. ceiba. These results provide new insights into the effects of the Tanaka Line on genetic isolation and population differentiation of plant species in southwest China.Entities:
Keywords: Bombax ceiba; Tanaka Line; genetic diversity; population structure; simple sequence repeats
Year: 2018 PMID: 29686841 PMCID: PMC5901178 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Geographic distribution of B. ceiba. Each dot represents a natural population sampled in this study
Description of the six SSR primer combinations used for analyzing B. ceiba
| Locus | Sample size |
|
|
|
| PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC1 | 408 | 5 | 1.9435 | 0.3382 | 0.4867 | 0.3974 |
| BC5 | 442 | 7 | 1.3190 | 0.2217 | 0.2424 | 0.2311 |
| BC9 | 428 | 4 | 2.5453 | 0.4486 | 0.6085 | 0.5534 |
| BC10 | 440 | 6 | 2.1617 | 0.4455 | 0.5386 | 0.4396 |
| BC11 | 410 | 2 | 1.8274 | 0.3610 | 0.4539 | 0.3503 |
| BC12 | 420 | 3 | 1.7926 | 0.3571 | 0.4432 | 0.3524 |
| Mean | 425 | 4.5 | 1.9316 | 0.3620 | 0.4622 | 0.3874 |
A, number of alleles; N e, effective number of alleles; H o, observed heterozygosity; H e, expected heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphism information content.
Genetic diversity of natural populations of B. ceiba
| Population |
| Number of polymorphic bands | PPB (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BN | 13 | 5 | 83.33 | 0.3467 ± 0.2410 | 0.5450 ± 0.3915 |
| YJ | 9 | 6 | 100 | 0.3940 ± 0.1554 | 0.6261 ± 0.2282 |
| BC | 17 | 6 | 100 | 0.4084 ± 0.1153 | 0.6577 ± 0.1936 |
| LC | 13 | 6 | 100 | 0.4178 ± 0.1171 | 0.6822 ± 0.1711 |
| PE | 12 | 6 | 100 | 0.4613 ± 0.1256 | 0.7668 ± 0.2632 |
| YD | 22 | 6 | 100 | 0.4775 ± 0.1214 | 0.7439 ± 0.1997 |
| GM | 19 | 6 | 100 | 0.4665 ± 0.1046 | 0.7362 ± 0.2309 |
| HH | 6 | 4 | 66.67 | 0.3244 ± 0.2513 | 0.4821 ± 0.3808 |
| LJ | 34 | 6 | 100 | 0.3333 ± 0.1418 | 0.5812 ± 0.2136 |
| SD | 6 | 6 | 100 | 0.4005 ± 0.1393 | 0.6233 ± 0.2339 |
| LL | 5 | 6 | 100 | 0.4658 ± 0.0509 | 0.7120 ± 0.1196 |
| RH | 9 | 6 | 100 | 0.2377 ± 0.1573 | 0.3997 ± 0.2081 |
| LSH | 14 | 6 | 100 | 0.3098 ± 0.1946 | 0.5550 ± 0.3248 |
| YB | 9 | 5 | 83.33 | 0.4537 ± 0.2923 | 0.7848 ± 0.5417 |
| ET | 13 | 5 | 83.33 | 0.3084 ± 0.1881 | 0.4810 ± 0.2840 |
| YM | 12 | 6 | 100 | 0.3592 ± 0.1559 | 0.6336 ± 0.2883 |
| YY | 11 | 5 | 83.33 | 0.3110 ± 0.2158 | 0.4802 ± 0.3235 |
N, sample size; PPB, percentage of polymorphic bands; H E, Nei's gene diversity; I, Shannon and Weaver's index.
Figure 2UPGMA dendrogram obtained for the B. ceiba populations based on Nei's genetic distance (Nei, 1972)
Figure 3Mantel test between genetic distance and geographic distance among the 17 B. ceiba populations
AMOVA test results for 224 B. ceiba individuals in the 17 natural populations
| Regions | Source of variation |
| SSD | Variance component | Percentage variance (%) | Fixation Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole | Among groups | 1 | 5.817 | 0.01798 | 2.69 |
|
| Among populations | 15 | 24.212 | 0.03930 | 5.89 |
| |
| Within populations | 431 | 262.949 | 0.61009 | 91.42 |
| |
| Total | 447 | 292.978 | 0.66737 | |||
| Northern region | Among populations | 8 | 22.865 | 0.09829 | 12.07 |
|
| Within populations | 189 | 135.347 | 0.71612 | 87.93 | ||
| Southern region | Among populations | 7 | 14.458 | 0.04746 | 6.81 |
|
| Within populations | 242 | 157.162 | 0.64943 | 93.19 |
Figure 4STRUCTURE clustering analysis results for B. ceiba populations based on their geographic distribution. Colors represent the population's probability of populations belonging to either of the two clusters, where blue represents cluster 1 and yellow represents cluster 2. The right‐hand figure shows the number of clusters (K) determined for the B. ceiba populations analyzed was the highest peak that was at K = 2. Each vertical bar in the histogram represents a population
Genetic differentiation and gene flow in the 17 B. ceiba populations
| Locus |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC1 | 0.0465 | 0.2717 | 0.2362 | 0.8086 |
| BC5 | 0.0331 | 0.0951 | 0.0641 | 3.6508 |
| BC9 | 0.1296 | 0.2665 | 0.1573 | 1.3393 |
| BC10 | 0.0660 | 0.1464 | 0.0861 | 2.6535 |
| BC11 | −0.1405 | 0.1553 | 0.2593 | 0.7140 |
| BC12 | 0.0690 | 0.2683 | 0.2140 | 0.9180 |
| Mean | 0.0439 | 0.2112 | 0.1749 | 1.1792 |
MIGRATE analysis for B. ceiba using SSR data
| Parameter | Percentiles | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.005 | 0.025 | 0.05 | 0.25 | MLE | 0.75 | 0.95 | 0.975 | 0.995 | |
|
| 0.9401 | 1.0096 | 1.0469 | 1.1677 | 1.2573 | 1.3521 | 1.4998 | 1.5540 | 1.6768 |
|
| 0.8679 | 0.9453 | 0.9824 | 1.0986 | 1.1868 | 1.2821 | 1.4339 | 1.4868 | 1.5950 |
m 12, migration rate from cluster 1 to cluster 2; m 21, migration rate from cluster 2 to cluster 1.
Figure 5BARRIER analysis results showing the spatial separation. The BARRIER analysis results were based on microsatellite data (upper right)
| Population code | Location |
| Geographic coordinates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latitude (N) | Longitude (E) | Altitude (m) | |||
| BN | Xishuangbanna, Yunnan | 13 | 21°53′ | 100°59′ | 570 |
| YJ | Yuanjiang, Yunnan | 9 | 23°31′ | 102°03′ | 850 |
| BC | Binchuan, Yunnan | 17 | 25°49′ | 100°34′ | 1,430 |
| LC | Lancang, Yunnan | 13 | 22°32′ | 100°18′ | 1,090 |
| PE | Puer, Yunnan | 12 | 22°45′ | 100°13′ | 1,340 |
| YD | Yongde, Yunnan | 22 | 24°02′ | 99°22′ | 1,110 |
| GM | Gengma, Yunnan | 19 | 23°22′ | 99°38′ | 890 |
| HH | Honghe, Yunnan | 6 | 23°21′ | 102°24′ | 520 |
| LJ | Lujiang, Yunnan | 34 | 24°53′ | 98°53′ | 660 |
| SD | Shidian, Yunnan | 6 | 24°28′ | 99°15′ | 1,100 |
| LL | Longling, Yunnan | 5 | 24°19′ | 99°01′ | 750 |
| RH | Renhe, Sichuan | 9 | 26°28′ | 101°44′ | 1,110 |
| LSH | Lushui, Yunnan | 14 | 25°34′ | 98°52′ | 1,060 |
| YB | Yangbi, Yunnan | 9 | 25°35′ | 100°13′ | 2,100 |
| ET | Ertan, Sichuan | 13 | 26°48′ | 101°47′ | 1,100 |
| YM | Yuanmou, Yunnan | 12 | 25°36′ | 101°49′ | 1,120 |
| YY | Yuanyang, Yunnan | 11 | 22°57′ | 102°42′ | 600 |
| Locus | Primer sequence (5′→3′) | Repeat motif | Allele size range (bp) | Ta (°C) | Fluorescent dye | BLAST to hit description [organism] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC1 | F: TACTCCGAAACTCACGCCTT | (CTT)7 | 270–273 | 59 | 6‐FAM |
Nonintrinsic ABC protein 6, putative isoform 2 |
| R: AAAGACGTATCGGTGAAGCG | ||||||
| BC5 | F: ACAAAAATGGCGTCTTCTGG | (CAG)7 | 128–134 | 60 | 6‐FAM | — |
| R: GCAGGAGATCCATGGTGATT | ||||||
| BC9 | F: TTTGAAAGGGAGGGTGTTTG | (GACT)6 | 134–138 | 57 | HEX | — |
| R: GAGGAGGAAAAGTTATGTTTTGG | ||||||
| BC10 | F: ACCTCCTGCACAGACCATTC | (ACA)8 | 213–216 | 60 | 6‐FAM | — |
| R: CATGGGGGAAAATTTTGTTG | ||||||
| BC11 | F: TGGGAGCTGAGATTTGATCC | (CAGC)6 | 316–320 | 60 | NED | — |
| R: CCCCACTGGATTGATTGATT | ||||||
| BC12 | F: TCCATCCAAATTCAGCAACA | (CAG)8 | 147–150 | 60 | HEX |
Auxin efflux facilitator isoform 6 |
| R: GGTTTGCTGCAAGGAGAGTC |