| Literature DB >> 29686840 |
Yongji Wang1, Liming Lai2, Hui Du2, Lianhe Jiang2, Fei Wang2, Chao Zhang2, Ping Zhuang2, Yuanrun Zheng2.
Abstract
The reproductive stages of the life cycle are crucial in explaining the distribution patterns of plant species because of their extreme vulnerability to environmental conditions. Despite reported evidence that seed germination is related to habitat macroclimatic characteristics, such as mean annual temperature, the effect of this trait in controlling plant species distribution has not yet been systematically and quantitatively evaluated. To learn whether seed germination can predict species distribution along altitude gradients, we examined germination data of 36 Rhododendron species in southeastern Tibet originating from contrasting altitudes, habitats, plant heights, seed masses, and phylogenies. Germination varied significantly with altitude, habitat, plant height, and phylogeny and was higher in the light than in the dark. Germination percentage was highest at 10:20°C in the light and 15:25°C in the dark. As altitude increased, germination percentages first rose and then decreased, being highest at 3,500-4,000 m. Germination percentage and rate were highest on rocky slopes, increasing as seed mass and plant height rose. Variations in germination percentage and rate were not significant at subgenera, section, and subsection levels, but they were significant at species level. The results suggested that the relationship between germination and altitude may provide insights into species distribution patterns. Further, germination patterns are a result of long-term evolution as well as taxonomic constraints.Entities:
Keywords: Rhododendron; Tibet; altitude; habitat; phylogeny; plant height; seed germination; seed mass
Year: 2018 PMID: 29686840 PMCID: PMC5901180 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1(a) Seeds of fourteen kinds of R.s before experiment. (b) Seeds of R. hookeri in germination
Environment variables and seed mass (Mean ± SD, n = 3, 1,000 seeds for each replicate) of 44 populations of 36 congeneric Rhododendron species
| Population | Species | Altitude | Habitat | Mean height of plant (m) | Subgenus | Section | Subsection | Seed mass (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4,220 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.0713 ± 0.0006 |
| 2 |
| 4,170 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0.0550 ± 0.0002 |
| 3 |
| 4,130 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.1161 ± 0.0005 |
| 4 |
| 3,600 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.1491 ± 0.0031 |
| 5 |
| 3,760 | 3 | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.0772 ± 0.0017 |
| 6 |
| 3,660 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.0757 ± 0.0006 | ||
| 7 |
| 3,680 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0.0829 ± 0.0017 |
| 8 |
| 3,210 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0.0536 ± 0.0019 |
| 9 |
| 2,600 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0.0560 ± 0.0066 |
| 10 |
| 2,650 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0.1257 ± 0.0031 |
| 11 |
| 2,670 | 3 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0.1499 ± 0.0008 |
| 12 |
| 2,510 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0.0207 ± 0.0047 |
| 13 |
| 3,570 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.0940 ± 0.0005 |
| 14 |
| 3,260 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0.0543 ± 0.0021 |
| 15 |
| 4,450 | 1 | 0.1 | 2 | 3 | 0.0817 ± 0.0009 | |
| 16 |
| 2,900 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0.0703 ± 0.0007 |
| 17 |
| 2,760 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.1764 ± 0.0106 |
| 18 |
| 3,420 | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0.0522 ± 0.0017 |
| 19 |
| 3,570 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0.0858 ± 0.0027 |
| 20 |
| 3,170 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.1222 ± 0.0006 |
| 21 |
| 4,000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.0764 ± 0.0006 |
| 22 |
| 4,490 | 1 | 0.3 | 2 | 3 | 0.0828 ± 0.0014 | |
| 23 |
| 3,570 | 3 | 1.7 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0.0685 ± 0.0011 |
| 24 |
| 3,140 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0.0993 ± 0.0062 |
| 25 |
| 3,150 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0.2845 ± 0.0048 |
| 26 |
| 3,140 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0.0718 ± 0.0001 |
| 27 |
| 4,170 | 1 | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0.0263 ± 0.0015 |
| 28 |
| 2,640 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.1980 ± 0.0224 |
| 29 |
| 2,870 | 3 | 1.2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0.0607 ± 0.0007 |
| 30 |
| 3,940 | 1 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.0418 ± 0.0011 | ||
| 31 |
| 3,690 | 1 | 1.5 | 3 | 0.0793 ± 0.0013 | ||
| 32 |
| 4,350 | 1 | 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0.0193 ± 0.0009 |
| 33 |
| 4,150 | 1 | 0.2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0.0235 ± 0.0006 |
| 34 |
| 3,210 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.1069 ± 0.0017 |
| 35 |
| 2,920 | 3 | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.0978 ± 0.0055 |
| 36 |
| 4,010 | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.0393 ± 0.0008 |
| 37 |
| 4,450 | 1 | 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0.1046 ± 0.0005 |
| 38 |
| 4,530 | 1 | 1.4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.0689 ± 0.0003 |
| 39 |
| 4,170 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.1201 ± 0.0500 |
| 40 |
| 4,130 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.1002 ± 0.0008 |
| 41 |
| 4,040 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.0972 ± 0.0016 |
| 42 |
| 3,570 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.1060 ± 0.0006 |
| 43 |
| 3,150 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0.0967 ± 0.0058 |
| 44 |
| 3,600 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0.1182 ± 0.0009 |
Habitat: 1, alpine shrub; 2, rocky slope; 3, forest.
Subgenus: 1, Subgen. Hymenanthes (Blume) K. Koch; 2, Subgen. Rhododendron; 3, Subgen. Pseudazalea Sleumer.
Section: 1, Sect. Ponticum G. Don; 2, Sect. Rhododendron; 3, Sect. Pogonanthum G. Don.
Subsection: 1, subsect. Grandia Sleumer; 2, subsect. Neriiflora Sleumer; 3, subsect. Campanulata Sleumer; 4, subsect. Parishia Sleumer; 5, subsect. Barbata Sleumer; 6, subsect. Selensia Sleumer; 7, subsect. Irrorata Sleumer; 8, subsect. Cinnabarina (Hutch.) Sleumer; 9, subsect. Lapponica (Balf. F.) Sleumer; 10, subsect. Taliensia Sleumer; 11, subsect. Falconera Sleumer; 12, subsect. Thomsonii Sleumer; 13, subsect. Maddenia (Hutch.) Sleumer; 14, subsect. Edgeworthia (Hutch.) Sleumer; 15, subsect. Heliolepida (Hutch.) Sleumer; 16, subsect. Arborea Sleumer; 17, subsect. Fulva Sleumer; 18, subsect. Saluenensia (Hutch.) Sleumer; 19, subsect. Glauca (Hutch.) Sleumer; 20, subsect. Triflora (Hutch.) Sleumer; 21, subsect. Lanata Chamb; 22, subsect. Campylogyna (Hutch.) Sleumer.
Results of two‐way ANOVA on final germination percentage (FGP) of the 36 Rhododendron species seeds under different temperature and light intensity
| Source |
| FPG | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Temperature (T) | 4 | 13.478 | .000 |
| Light (L) | 1 | 68.526 | .000 |
| T × L | 4 | 4.363 | .004 |
Figure 2Final germination percentage (mean ± ) of 36 Rhododendron species under different temperature and light conditions. Each bar represents all species within each group; bars with different letters are significantly different from each other at p < .05 (Turkey test)
Figure 3Final germination percentage (mean ± ) of 36 Rhododendron species at different altitude. Each bar represents all species within each group.; bars with different letters are significantly different from each other at p < .05 (Turkey test)
Figure 4Final germination percentage (mean ± ) of 36 Rhododendron species distributed in different habitats. Each bar represents all species within each group; bars with different letters are significantly different from each other at p < .05 (Turkey test)
Figure 5Relationships between seed mass and final seed germination percentage and germination rate of 36 Rhododendron plants. Each bar represents all species within each group; bars with different letters are significantly different from each other at p < .05 (Turkey test)
Figure 6Final germination percentage (mean ± ) of 36 Rhododendron species with different plant height. Each bar represents all species within each group; bars with different letters are significantly different from each other at p < .05 (Turkey test)
Total amount of FGP explained by a nested model including all taxonomic levels above species; component R 2, FGP variation explained by subgenus, section within subgenus, subsection within section, species within subsection
| Source of variance |
| Sum of squares | Component |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 147 | 52.25 | 1 |
| Subgenus | 1 | 5.61 | .1 |
| Section | 2 | 7.93 | .14 |
| Subsection | 21 | 8.42 | .17 |
| Species | 36 | 14.46 | .28 |
| Error | 87 | 15.83 | .31 |
Power of each factor to explain FGP variation in GLM containing a categorical variable
| Source |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | 35 | 0.43 | 9.45 | .38 |
| Seed mass | 3 | 1.87 | 38.41 | .12 |
| Plant height | 4 | 0.95 | 19.76 | .06 |
| Habitat | 2 | 1.75 | 36.42 | .09 |
| Altitude | 3 | 0.89 | 17.93 | .07 |
Multifactorial ANOVAs for the independent effects of each factor. To calculate the proportion of the variance explained by only one of the main factors, we subtracted the R 2 of the incomplete ANOVA with that factor removed, from the R 2 of the complete model
| Source of variation | Full model | Plant height removed | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Species | 35 | 0.31 | 7.13 | .35 | 35 | 0.34 | 7.12 | .36 |
| Seed mass | 3 | 0.24 | 6.47 | .15 | 3 | 0.26 | 6.51 | .16 |
| Plant height | 4 | 0.14 | 3.42 | .06 | ||||
| Habitat | 2 | 0.09 | 2.16 | .03 | 2 | 0.10 | 2.26 | .04 |
| Altitude | 3 | 0.12 | 2.54 | .07 | 3 | 0.14 | 2.56 | .08 |
| Corrected model | 47 | 0.38 | 9.16 | .41 | 43 | 0.39 | 9.26 | .33 |