Literature DB >> 29686747

High-quality draft genome of the methanotroph Methylovulum psychrotolerans Str. HV10-M2 isolated from plant material at a high-altitude environment.

Alejandro Mateos-Rivera1,2, Tajul Islam1, Ian P G Marshall3, Lars Schreiber3,4, Lise Øvreås1,5.   

Abstract

Here we present the genome of Methylovulum psychrotolerans strain HV10-M2, a methanotroph isolated from Hardangervidda national park (Norway). This strain represents the second of the two validly published species genus with a sequenced genome. The other is M. miyakonense HT12, which is the type strain of the species and the type species of the genus Methylovulum. We present the genome of M. psychrotolerants str. HV10-M2 and discuss the differences between M. psychrotolerans and M. miyakonense. The genome size of M. psychrotolerans str. HV10-M2 is 4,923,400 bp and contains 4415 protein-coding genes, 50 RNA genes and an average GC content of 50.88%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gammaproteobacteria; High-altitude; Methanotroph; Methylovulum; Methylovulum psychrotolerans HV10-M2

Year:  2018        PMID: 29686747      PMCID: PMC5898042          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-018-0314-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Methanotrophs are a group of microorganisms that utilize methane as the sole energy and carbon source. They are important contributors to the global carbon budget and climate change, reducing methane emissions to the atmosphere as they represent the only known biological methane sink [1]. Aerobic methane oxidation can be performed by members of the phyla (classes and ) and [2, 3]. The recently described genus [4] belongs to the family within the class . Their cells are described as aerobic, non-motile gram-negative bacteria with coccoid or rod-shape cells, they grow with methane and methanol as carbon sources and they have been isolated from cold environments [5]. So far, only one species within this genus, HT12, has published available genome data. However, the 16S rRNA gene sequence of three isolates belonging to the genus have been recently reported [5]. Here we report the characteristics of HV10-M2 (Fig. 1), isolated from plant material collected from a peat bog saturated with water at Hardangervidda, a high-altitude (> 1230 m above sea level) national park located in central Norway. We present the genome of str. HV10-M2, and provide first insights into the genomic and physiological differences between HV10-M2 and HT12.
Fig. 1

Transmission electron microscope picture of the strain Methylovulum psychrotolerans HV10-M2. Cell wall (CW) and intracytoplasmatic membrane (ICM) are labelled in the pictures. Scale bars represent 500 (left panel) and 100 (right panel) nm

Transmission electron microscope picture of the strain Methylovulum psychrotolerans HV10-M2. Cell wall (CW) and intracytoplasmatic membrane (ICM) are labelled in the pictures. Scale bars represent 500 (left panel) and 100 (right panel) nm

Organism information

Classification and features

HV10-M2 was isolated from wet plant material located in a peat bog at the high-altitude (1230 m above sea level) national park Hardangervidda (Norway) (GPS: 60.22 N, 7.25 E) on July 17, 2015. Air temperature during sampling was 9 °C. The strain was enriched from approximately 4 g of the plant material collected from the peat bog which was added directly to a 120 mL sterile serum flask containing 20 mL of LMM medium (Low-Salt-Methanotrophic medium; KNO3 0.1 g L− 1, MgSO4 0.1 g L− 1, CaCl2·2H2O 0.02 g L− 1, KBr 0.01 g L− 1 [6]), closed with a butyl rubber stopper and sealed with an aluminum crimp. Methane (purity 99.5%, Yara Praxair, Oslo, Norway) was amended with a syringe through a 0.2 μm DynaGard® filter (CA, USA) to a final ratio of 4:1 (methane/air; v/v). The flask was incubated under dark conditions at 16 °C for three weeks without shaking. The gas mixture was restored every seven days, and growth was monitored using phase contrast microscopy (Eclipse E400 microscope, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The enrichment culture was transferred five times into serum flasks with LMM medium as described above. Serial dilutions (10− 5 to 10− 8) were then prepared and aliquots of 0.1 mL of each dilution were spread onto LMM agar plates. Plates were incubated at 16 °C in jars filled with a methane:air gas mixture (4:1, v/v). Single pink colonies (previously isolated strains show pink pigmentation [5]) were picked and re-streaked onto new agar plates. Finally, one single colony was transferred into a serum flask with LMM medium (see above) and incubated for one week at 16 °C. Purity of the isolate was confirmed by PCR and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, at 60 kV, Jeol JEM-1230, Tokyo, Japan). Contamination was assessed as reported previously [6, 7]. HV10-M2 grows between 4 °C and 25 °C, with optimal growth between 13 °C to 20 °C. Strain HV10-M2 grows using methane and methanol as the carbon and energy source. The optimal pH for growth 6.8. Cells of HV10-M2 are aerobic, non-motile, coccoid- to rod-shaped and form light pink colonies when checked on LMM agar plates. Average cell size is 2 μm. The characteristics of HV10-M2 are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Methylovulum psychrotolerans strain HV10_M2T

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain BacteriaTAS [34]
Phylum ProteobacteriaTAS [35]
Class GammaproteobacteriaTAS [36]
Order MethylococcalesTAS [37]
Family MethylococcaceaeTAS [38]
Genus MethylovulumTAS [4]
Species psychrotoleransTAS [5]
Strain: Sph1TAS [5]
Gram stain Negative IDA
Cell shape Coccoid / Rod-shape IDA
Motility Non-motile IDA
Sporulation Non-sporulating IDA
Temperature range 4–25 °C IDA
Optimum temperature 13–20 °C IDA
pH range; Optimum 5–7; 6.8 IDA
Carbon source Methane IDA
MIGS-6Habitat Peat bog IDA
MIGS-6.3SalinityND
MIGS-22Oxygen requirement Aerobic IDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationship Free-living IDA
MIGS-14Pathogenicity Non-pathogen NAS
MIGS-4Geographic location Hardangervidda, Norway IDA
MIGS-5Sample collection 2015 IDA
MIGS-4.1Latitude 60.22 N IDA
MIGS-4.2Longitude 7.25 E IDA
MIGS-4.4Altitude 1230 m a.s.l. IDA

aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [39]

Classification and general features of Methylovulum psychrotolerans strain HV10_M2T aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [39] The 16S rRNA gene of HV10-M2 shows more than 99% sequence identity with Sph1, Sph2 and Oz2 (GenBank accession numbers KT381578, KT381580 and KT381582, respectively; Fig. 2). However, none of those strains has genome data publicly available. The highest sequence identity with a strain with genome data was HT12. The two strains HV10-M2 and HT12 show 95% sequence identity in the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree. The tree is based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the best hits of cultured strains in the nucleotide database from NCBI (retrieved on June 5, 2017). The tree was reconstructed by using maximum likelihood analysis and the Jukes-Cantor nucleotide substitution model as implemented in MEGA v7 [40]. Robustness of the tree was determined using 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sequences were aligned with MUSCLE [41] in MEGA v7. The tree was rooted against the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Escherichia coli. Accession numbers are provided within parenthesis. The strain presented in this study is marked with a red dot. Strains with available genome data are marked with black dots. Bootstrap values less than 50 are not shown

Phylogenetic tree. The tree is based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the best hits of cultured strains in the nucleotide database from NCBI (retrieved on June 5, 2017). The tree was reconstructed by using maximum likelihood analysis and the Jukes-Cantor nucleotide substitution model as implemented in MEGA v7 [40]. Robustness of the tree was determined using 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sequences were aligned with MUSCLE [41] in MEGA v7. The tree was rooted against the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Escherichia coli. Accession numbers are provided within parenthesis. The strain presented in this study is marked with a red dot. Strains with available genome data are marked with black dots. Bootstrap values less than 50 are not shown

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

HV10-M2 was whole genome sequenced at the Department of Bioscience at Aarhus University, Denmark in September 2016. The genome project was deposited in GOLD under the project Ga0185950. The Whole Genome Shotgun project was deposited at GenBank with the accession number CP022129. Summarized information about the project and the sequencing platform details are included in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityHigh-quality-draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedPaired-end NexteraXT DNA
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina MiSeq
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage303.7X
MIGS 30AssemblersSPAdes 3.9.0
MIGS 32Gene calling methodProdigal v2.6.2
Locus TagCEK71
Genbank IDCP022129
GenBank Date of Release2017–06-27
GOLD IDGp029646
BIOPROJECTPRJNA391059
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierHV10-M2
Project relevanceEnvironmental
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

HV10-M2 was cultivated in a 120 ml serum flask at 16 °C containing LMM medium with methane addition. After turbidity was observed (approximately 2 months), it was transferred onto LMM agar plates and incubated with methane as headspace gas (4:1, v/v). A single colony was transferred into a flask containing LMM medium and finally, 1.5 mL of the culture was harvested by centrifugation and genomic DNA was isolated from the pellet using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA) following the manufacturer recommendations and purified using the DNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo Research, USA).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genomic DNA of strain HV10-M2 was sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq Reagent Kit V3 (Illumina, CA, USA) and the sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit (Illumina). A total of 4,933,624 sequence reads were generated. FastQC [8] was used for quality control. Reads were adaptor- and quality trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.36 [9] when bases were at the end of the reads and when the average quality was below the quality threshold (Phred score < 33) with the parameters: CROP:289, HEADCROP:19, SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20, MINLEN:100, resulting in 4,019,650 paired-end reads and 4.92 Mb with an overall coverage estimate of 303.7×. Assembly of the data was performed using SPAdes v3.9.0 [10] with the “--careful” option and the k-mer values 21, 33, 55, 77, 99, 127. The assembly was evaluated with QUAST v4.3 [11]. The assembly yielded 186 contigs with a total length of 4,923,400 bp, and an N50 value of 71,358 bp.

Genome annotation

Gene prediction and annotation was performed using the standard operating procedure of the Integrated Microbial Genomes platform developed by the Joint Genome Institute [12]. In addition, the genome of HV10-M2 was submitted to BlastKOALA [13] and Pathway tools [14] to be compared against the KEGG [15] and MetaCyc [16] databases, respectively, for pathway predictions.

Genome properties

The properties of the draft genome of HV10-M2 are shown in Table 3 and the genes associated with COG functional categories in Table 4. The genome consists of 4,923,400 bp with a GC content of 50.88%. The genome is estimated to be 99% complete as determined by CheckM v1.0.7 [17] compared to the family . In total 4465 genes were predicted: 50 RNA genes and 4415 protein-coding genes. In addition, 2344 genes were assigned in COG functional categories. The PHAST program, used to detect prophages sequences in bacterial genomes [18], determined no evidence of completed prophages in the genome of HV10-M2.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)4,923,400100
DNA coding (bp)4,194,86985.20
DNA G + C (bp)2,504,95550.88
DNA scaffolds186100
Total genes4465100
Protein coding genes441598.88
RNA genes501.12
Pseudo genes00
Genes in internal clusters80418.01
Genes with function prediction298466.83
Genes assigned to COGs234452.50
Genes with Pfam domains315970.75
Genes with signal peptides4389.81
Genes with transmembrane helices89720.09
CRISPR repeats00
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%ageDescription
J1947.48Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A20.08RNA processing and modification
K1244.78Transcription
L1214.66Replication, recombination and repair
B10.04Chromatin structure and dynamics
D401.54Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V883.39Defense mechanisms
T1827.01Signal transduction mechanisms
M2318.9Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N562.16Cell motility
U562.16Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1375.28Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1616.2Energy production and conversion
G973.74Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E1606.17Amino acid transport and metabolism
F632.43Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1566.01Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I682.62Lipid transport and metabolism
P1545.93Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q451.73Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2439.36General function prediction only
S1485.7Function unknown
212147.5Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Here we present the draft genome sequencing and annotation of HV10-M2. The 16S rRNA gene of HV10-M2 shows a 99% sequence identity with strains Sph1, Sph2 and Oz2 as well as sp. Eb1 and bacterium M200 (see also Fig. 2). The highest identity to a strain with an available genome sequence was 95% with HT12, which is the only genome sequenced species within the genus.

Extended insights

Methanotrophic microorganisms oxidize methane to carbon dioxide and water. In a first step, methane is converted into methanol in a process catalyzed by the methane monooxigenase enzyme (MMO). There are two types of MMO, the membrane-bound particulate MMO (pMMO), which is found in all methanotrophs except for some members of the genera and [19, 20], and the cytoplasmatic soluble MMO (sMMO), which is limited to very few species [21]. In the genome of HV10-M2, the presence of a single copy of the gene cluster pmoABC was observed (locus tags RS17435, RS17440, RS17440). The pmoABC cluster contains the genes encoding for the pMMO. However, the mmoX gene encoding for the sMMO was absent in the genome of HV10-M2. The mmoX gene is reported to be present in HT12. To confirm the absence of this gene in HV10-M2, the mmoX gene sequence was blasted against the genome of HV10-M2 using the sequence of HT12 as query (Genbank accession number AB501287). In addition, a mmoX-specific PCR with the primer set 882F/1403R [22] was performed. Both approaches confirmed the absence of the mmoX gene in HV10-M2. Additionally, the pxmABC operon described in some gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs [23], was not observed in the genome of HV10-M2. The following step in the oxidation of methane is the conversion of methanol into formaldehyde. This reaction is catalyzed by a methanol dehydrogenase that contains a pyrroloquinoline quinone as a cofactor and requires a cytochrome c as electron acceptor [24]. The gene clusters associated with this step present in the genome of HV10-M2 are: (i) the gene cluster mxaFJ that encodes the components active in methanol oxidation (locus tags RS12435, RS12440); (ii) the cluster mxaACKL required for MDH synthesis and PQQ insertion into the MDH (locus tags RS12465, RS12475, RS12480); and (iii) the gene cluster pqqABCDE involved in the PQQ biosynthesis (locus tags RS20845, RS01900, RS01880, RS05860, RS12150). The MDH enzyme is also present in HT12. The gene xoxF that encodes for a polypeptide with similar sequence to the MxaF protein, has been suggested as an alternative to the MDH [25]. High identity (89%) between a gene encoding for a PQQ-dependent dehydrogenase in HV10-M2 (locus tag RS12435) and a methanotrophic XoxF protein (Accesion number: SAJ59293), suggesting that this protein could be also present in HV10-M2. The next step is the formaldehyde oxidation. This step is crucial, as formaldehyde is a cytotoxic compound. The methanotrophs can use different pathways to perform oxidation of formaldehyde to formate. In the tetrahydromethanopterin (H4MPT)-linked C1 transfer pathway, presence of the genes encoding for the tetrahydromethanopterin protein and processes such as fae, mch and mtdB, were observed in the genome of HV10-M2. Most likely the H4MPT-linked pathway will act as a secondary pathway involved in formaldehyde assimilation as the Ribulose MonoPhosphate will act as the principal pathway [24]. In addition, like in most of the methylotrophs, presence of the genes encoding for the tetrahydrofolate pathway including the methylene-H4F dehydrogenase and methenyl-H4F cyclohydrolase enzymes of the FoID [24], are also present in the genome of HV10-M2 (locus tags RS10730, RS15610). Methanotrophic microorganisms can be divided into type I () and type II () based on the cyclic pathway followed to perform C1 assimilation. Recently, type X methanotrophs have also been described [26]. Type I methanotrophs, such as HV10-M2, use the RuMP cycle, whereas type II methanotrophs use the serine cycle. Briefly, in the first step of the RuMP pathway D-arabino-3-hexulose-6-phosphate is formed from ribulose-5-phosphate, which will be later converted into fructose-6-phosphate. Then, fructose-6-phosphate is converted into Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate through the 6-phosphofructokinase using PPi as the donor in a reversible reaction. Finally, an aldolase will form glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate. Several genes encoding for enzymes used in the Serine cycle such as hydroxytransmethylase, serine-glyoxylate aminotransferase and hydroxypyruvate reductase were also present in the genome of HV10-M2. However, the serine cycle is not completed, as the genes encoding for the malyl-CoA lyase enzyme could not be found in the genome. This is not surprising as other type I methanotrophs such as HT12, SV96 [27] or BG8 [28] also contain the genes encoding for most of the serine pathway. However, in the latter two, the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase enzyme is absent in the genome while in the strains is present. So far, there is no knowledge about any methanotrophic strain encoding for all the enzymes in both, the RuMP and the serine cycle. The oxidation of formate to CO2 is performed by the formate dehydrogenase enzyme. The genes encoding for the FDH enzyme were also present in the genome of HV10-M2 (locus tag RS07700). It has been previously reported that this step is less demanding in organisms using the RuMP pathway for formaldehyde assimilation, such as HV10-M2, and therefore FDH activities are very low [24]. It is known that some methanotrophs such as members of the genera and (Type X methanotrophs), have genes encoding for enzymes involved in the Calvin-Benson-Basham cycle responsible for carbon dioxide fixation [29]. However, no evidence of the genes encoding for the ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), cbbL, cbbS and cbbQ, was found in the genome of HV10-M2. Methanotrophic bacteria also play a major role in the nitrogen cycle. The MMO can oxidize ammonia into nitrite and nitrous oxide as they are evolutionary related [30]. The prevailing view was that only type II and type X methanotrophs could have the ability to fix nitrogen, and although recently it has been suggested that some type I methanotrophs ( and ) could also perform nitrogen assimilation. Although in the genome of HV10-M2 the nitrogenase gene cluster nifDKH was present (locus tag RS1055, RS01060, RS01050), the anfG gene encoding for the nitrogenase delta subunit was absent, therefore HV10-M2 cannot fix nitrogen. This result matches with other members of the genus where no growth in nitrogen-free medium was reported [4]. The nitrite reductase genes nirK and nirS involved in the formation of nitric oxide were not found in the genome of HV10-M2, furthermore the genes norBC, involved in the following reaction (formation of nitrous oxide from nitric oxide), were not detected in the genome of HV10-M2. Although the nitrite reductase genes are common in methanotrophs, they have not been found in others such as HT12 or or denitrificans [4, 31]. The absence of the genes norBC, present in the latter methanotrophs, in HV10-M2 could be due to the completeness of the genome. Additionally the presence of the haoAB genes, encoding for the hydroxylamine dehydrogenase, that have been observed to be variable in methanotrophs, are absent in the genome of HT12 and HV10-M2. Compared to the reference strain of the genus, HT12, there are genetic and morphological differences with HV10-M2. The former has a pink color while the latter exhibited brown color. Additionally, the sMMO enzyme has been found only in one strain within the genus ( HT12). Further, the optimal growth temperature range between and is different. is psychrotolerant with an optimal growth temperature between 13 and 20 °C, whereas HT12 is mesophilic with an optimal temperature between 24 and 32 °C. Interestingly, most of the characteristics not shared between those strains such as, the pink color and the absence of the sMMO enzyme, are common within the strains including the strain M200 in the family [32] (Information about sp. Eb1 is not available). Those differences together with the 95% identity in the 16S rRNA gene between HT12 and HV10-M2 could suggest that the former belong to a different genus. To investigate this, the average nucleotide identity using BLAST were performed with the draft genomes. The strains shared ANIb values of 79.2%, being the highest amongst the closest strains with genome data available (Additional file 1: Table S1). Furthermore, recently it has been proposed that a prokaryotic genus can be defined as a group of species with pairwise values in the percentage of conserved proteins higher than 50% [33]. The POCP value between HT12 and HV10-M2 was 62.9%, therefore suggesting that HT12 and HV10-M2 belong to the same genus.

Conclusions

In the present study, we present the high-quality draft genome of HV10-M2. The genome consists of 4,923,400 bp in 4415 protein-coding genes, 50 RNA genes with and an average 50.88% GC content. As the genus has been recently described [4] only one genome has been available so far and this is from HT12. HV10-M2 has a 95% sequence identity with HT12. In addition, there are some differences between both species, such as the mmoX gene, which encodes for the sMMO enzyme. The mmoX gene is present only in whereas in is absent. The other differences are the colour, as showed a brown colour and is pink, and the optimal growth temperature. is mesophilic and is psychrotolerant. Table S1. ANIb analysis results with the similarities between the draft genomes of the four closest strains to M. psychrotolerans HV10-M2. (DOCX 15 kb)
  36 in total

1.  The ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase gene cluster of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath).

Authors:  Nardia J Baxter; Robert P Hirt; Levente Bodrossy; Kornel L Kovacs; T Martin Embley; James I Prosser; J Colin Murrell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Phylogenetic structure of unusual aquatic microbial formations in Nullarbor caves, Australia.

Authors:  A J Holmes; N A Tujula; M Holley; A Contos; J M James; P Rogers; M R Gillings
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related.

Authors:  A J Holmes; A Costello; M E Lidstrom; J C Murrell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Methylovulum miyakonense gen. nov., sp. nov., a type I methanotroph isolated from forest soil.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Iguchi; Hiroya Yurimoto; Yasuyoshi Sakai
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights.

Authors:  Qi-Long Qin; Bin-Bin Xie; Xi-Ying Zhang; Xiu-Lan Chen; Bai-Cheng Zhou; Jizhong Zhou; Aharon Oren; Yu-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  PHAST: a fast phage search tool.

Authors:  You Zhou; Yongjie Liang; Karlene H Lynch; Jonathan J Dennis; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Novel Methanotrophs of the Family Methylococcaceae from Different Geographical Regions and Habitats.

Authors:  Tajul Islam; Øivind Larsen; Vigdis Torsvik; Lise Øvreås; Hovik Panosyan; J Colin Murrell; Nils-Kåre Birkeland; Levente Bodrossy
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2015-08-21

8.  Environmental impacts on the diversity of methane-cycling microbes and their resultant function.

Authors:  Emma L Aronson; Steven D Allison; Brent R Helliker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Acid-Tolerant Moderately Thermophilic Methanotrophs of the Class Gammaproteobacteria Isolated From Tropical Topsoil with Methane Seeps.

Authors:  Tajul Islam; Vigdis Torsvik; Øivind Larsen; Levente Bodrossy; Lise Øvreås; Nils-Kåre Birkeland
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  A novel family of functional operons encoding methane/ammonia monooxygenase-related proteins in gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs.

Authors:  Patricia L Tavormina; Victoria J Orphan; Marina G Kalyuzhnaya; Mike S M Jetten; Martin G Klotz
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.