G Rangé1, S Chassaing2, P Marcollet3, C Saint-Étienne4, P Dequenne5, M Goralski6, P Bardiére7, F Beverilli8, L Godillon9, B Sabine9, C Laure1, S Gautier1, R Hakim1, F Albert1, D Angoulvant4, L Grammatico-Guillon10. 1. Cardiology department, les hôpitaux de Chartres, BP 30407, 28018, Chartres, France. 2. Cardiology department, clinique Saint-Gatien, 37000 Tours, France. 3. Cardiology department, centre hospitalier de Bourges, 18000 Bourges, France. 4. Cardiology department, centre hospitalo-universitaire de Tours, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France. 5. Cardiology department, clinique Oreliance, 45000 Orléans, France. 6. Cardiology department, centre hospitalier régional d'Orléans, Orléans, France. 7. Agence régionale de santé (ARS), BP 74409, 45044 Orléans, France. 8. Clinique Ambroise-Paré, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. 9. Unité régionale d'épidémiologie hospitalière (UREH), 37000 Tours, France. 10. Unité régionale d'épidémiologie hospitalière (UREH), 37000 Tours, France; Université de Tours, faculté de médecine, 37000 Tours, France. Electronic address: leslie.guillon@univ-tours.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability and low cost of a computerized interventional cardiology (IC) registry to prospectively and systematically collect high-quality data for all consecutive coronary patients referred for coronary angiogram or/and coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Rigorous clinical practice assessment is a key factor to improve prognosis in IC. A prospective and permanent registry could achieve this goal but, presumably, at high cost and low level of data quality. One multicentric IC registry (CRAC registry), fully integrated to usual coronary activity report software, started in the centre Val-de-Loire (CVL) French region in 2014. METHODS: Quality assessment of CRAC registry was conducted on five IC CathLab of the CVL region, from January 1st to December 31st 2014. Quality of collected data was evaluated by measuring procedure exhaustivity (comparing with data from hospital information system), data completeness (quality controls) and data consistency (by checking complete medical charts as gold standard). Cost per procedure (global registry operating cost/number of collected procedures) was also estimated. RESULTS: CRAC model provided a high-quality level with 98.2% procedure completeness, 99.6% data completeness and 89% data consistency. The operating cost per procedure was €14.70 ($16.51) for data collection and quality control, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) preadmission information and one-year follow-up after angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated computerized IC registry led to the construction of an exhaustive, reliable and costless database, including all coronary patients entering in participating IC centers in the CVL region. This solution will be developed in other French regions, setting up a national IC database for coronary patients in 2020: France PCI.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability and low cost of a computerized interventional cardiology (IC) registry to prospectively and systematically collect high-quality data for all consecutive coronary patients referred for coronary angiogram or/and coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Rigorous clinical practice assessment is a key factor to improve prognosis in IC. A prospective and permanent registry could achieve this goal but, presumably, at high cost and low level of data quality. One multicentric IC registry (CRAC registry), fully integrated to usual coronary activity report software, started in the centre Val-de-Loire (CVL) French region in 2014. METHODS: Quality assessment of CRAC registry was conducted on five IC CathLab of the CVL region, from January 1st to December 31st 2014. Quality of collected data was evaluated by measuring procedure exhaustivity (comparing with data from hospital information system), data completeness (quality controls) and data consistency (by checking complete medical charts as gold standard). Cost per procedure (global registry operating cost/number of collected procedures) was also estimated. RESULTS: CRAC model provided a high-quality level with 98.2% procedure completeness, 99.6% data completeness and 89% data consistency. The operating cost per procedure was €14.70 ($16.51) for data collection and quality control, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) preadmission information and one-year follow-up after angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated computerized IC registry led to the construction of an exhaustive, reliable and costless database, including all coronary patients entering in participating IC centers in the CVL region. This solution will be developed in other French regions, setting up a national IC database for coronary patients in 2020: France PCI.
Authors: Adrien Lemaignen; Leslie Grammatico-Guillon; Pascal Astagneau; Simon Marmor; Tristan Ferry; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Eric Senneville; Louis Bernard Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Farzin Beygui; Vincent Roule; Fabrice Ivanes; Thierry Dechery; Olivier Bizeau; Laurent Roussel; Philippe Dequenne; Marc-Antoine Arnould; Nicolas Combaret; Jean Philippe Collet; Philippe Commeau; Guillaume Cayla; Gilles Montalescot; Hakim Benamer; Pascal Motreff; Denis Angoulvant; Pierre Marcollet; Stephan Chassaing; Katrien Blanchart; René Koning; Grégoire Rangé Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Benjamin Duband; Pascal Motreff; Pierre Marcollet; Alexandre Gamet; Marie-Pascale Decomis; Olivier Bar; Christophe Saint Etienne; Radwan Hakim; Alexandre Canville; Louis Viallard; Farzin BeyguI; Pierre Francois Lesault; Philippe Bonnet; Eric Durand; Emmanuel Boiffard; Jean-Philippe Collet; Hakim Benamer; Philippe Commeau; Guillaume Cayla; Bruno Pereira; Rene Koning; Gregoire Rangé Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 1.817