Literature DB >> 29685416

PHASES score applied to a prospective cohort of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Paul M Foreman1, Philipp Hendrix2, Mark R Harrigan3, Winfield S Fisher3, Nilesh A Vyas4, Robert H Lipsky5, Beverly C Walters6, R Shane Tubbs7, Mohammadali M Shoja8, Christoph J Griessenauer9.   

Abstract

The treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms remains controversial. The PHASES score was developed to predict the 5-year risk of aneurysm rupture. We have assigned PHASES scores to a cohort of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients to assess the distribution of scores and its ability to predict outcome. In this study, the PHASES score was applied to a prospective cohort of aSAH patients that were enrolled in the Cerebral Aneurysm Renin Angiotensin System (CARAS) study. The CARAS study enrolled patients from two academic institutions in the United States from 2012 to 2015. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of outcome at last follow up. One hundred and forty-nine aSAH patients were included with a mean age of 54.9 ± 12.5 years. Most ruptured aneurysms were <7 mm (62.4%) and located in the anterior circulation (80.5%). Favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at last follow up was achieved in 61.7% of patients. PHASES scores ranged from 0 to 16 with a median of 5; the majority of patients had a score of 4 (20.1%) or 5 (32.2%). Multivariable modeling identified higher PHASES scores (OR 1.235, CI 1.016-1.501, p = 0.034) and higher Hunt and Hess grades (OR 2.224, CI 1.353-3.655, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of poor functional outcome (mRS 3-6) at last follow up. The majority of aSAH patients present with low (≤5) PHASES scores. Elevated PHASES scores are independently associated with poor functional outcome in patients with aSAH.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Outcome; PHASES score; Predictor; Risk factor; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29685416     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  9 in total

1.  Retrospective application of risk scores to ruptured intracranial aneurysms: would they have predicted the risk of bleeding?

Authors:  Carmelo Lucio Sturiale; Vittorio Stumpo; Luca Ricciardi; Gianluca Trevisi; Iacopo Valente; Sonia D'Arrigo; Kristy Latour; Paolo Barbone; Alessio Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Intracranial aneurysms at higher clinical risk for rupture demonstrate increased wall enhancement and thinning on multicontrast 3D vessel wall MRI.

Authors:  Jason Brett Hartman; Hiroko Watase; Jie Sun; Daniel S Hippe; Louis Kim; Michael Levitt; Laligam Sekhar; Niranjan Balu; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Mahmud Mossa-Basha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Application of unruptured aneurysm scoring systems to a cohort of ruptured aneurysms: are we underestimating rupture risk?

Authors:  James Feghali; Abhishek Gami; Risheng Xu; Christopher M Jackson; Rafael J Tamargo; Cameron G McDougall; Judy Huang; Justin M Caplan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Prospective assessment of aneurysmal rupture risk scores in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicentric cohort.

Authors:  P Lognon; F Gariel; G Marnat; J Darcourt; P Constant Dit Beaufils; J Burel; E Shotar; J F Hak; C Fauché; B Kerleroux; A Guédon; J Ognard; G Forestier; R Pop; C Paya; J B Veyrières; P Sporns; J B Girot; R Zannoni; F Zhu; A Crespy; V L'Allinec; D Mihoc; A Rouchaud; J C Gentric; W Ben Hassen; N Raynaud; B Testud; F Clarençon; B Kaczmarek; R Bourcier; G Bellanger; G Boulouis; Kevin Janot
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Unruptured cerebral aneurysm risk stratification: Background, current research, and future directions in aneurysm assessment.

Authors:  Michael A Silva; Stephanie Chen; Robert M Starke
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 6.  Intracranial aneurysm wall (in)stability-current state of knowledge and clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Philippe Bijlenga; Brenda R Kwak; Sandrine Morel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Association Between Aneurysmal Hemodynamics and Rupture Risk of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Zhongbin Tian; Xifeng Li; Chao Wang; Xin Feng; Kaijian Sun; Yi Tu; Hengxian Su; Xinjian Yang; Chuanzhi Duan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Development and validation of an institutional nomogram for aiding aneurysm rupture risk stratification.

Authors:  QingLin Liu; Peng Jiang; YuHua Jiang; HuiJian Ge; ShaoLin Li; HengWei Jin; Peng Liu; YouXiang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effect of Aneurysm and Patient Characteristics on Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Thickness.

Authors:  Jason M Acosta; Anne F Cayron; Nicolas Dupuy; Graziano Pelli; Bernard Foglia; Julien Haemmerli; Eric Allémann; Philippe Bijlenga; Brenda R Kwak; Sandrine Morel
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.