Literature DB >> 29685337

Evaluation of recent Protein A stationary phase innovations for capture of biotherapeutics.

Timothy M Pabst1, Johnny Thai2, Alan K Hunter2.   

Abstract

We describe a comprehensive evaluation of 12 Protein A stationary phases for capture of biotherapeutics. We first examine the morphological properties of the stationary phases using a variety of orthogonal techniques including electron microscopy, particle sizing, pressure-flow behavior, and isocratic pulse response. A panel of nine proteins spanning a wide range of structures and biochemical properties was then used to assess equilibrium uptake, mass transport, dynamic binding capacity, and elution pH. Process performance and product quality were also examined under realistic bioprocess conditions using clarified mammalian cell culture broth. Equilibrium isotherms were found to be highly favorable, with equilibrium binding capacity for monoclonal and bispecific antibodies ranging from 47-100 mg/mL packed bed across all stationary phases tested. Effective pore diffusivities, De, were obtained by fitting the chromatography general rate model to breakthrough data. The fitted De values for monoclonal antibodies ranged from 1.1-5.7 × 10-8 cm2/s. The stationary phases had high dynamic binding capacities for the model proteins. The highest dynamic capacities for monoclonal and bispecific antibodies were seen with MabSelect SuRe pcc and MabSelect PrismA, which ranged from 58-74 mg/mL packed bed at 4 min residence times. Product capture using clarified cell culture broth as a feedstock showed high yields and elution pool volumes that ranged from 2-3 column volumes in most cases. Host cell protein, DNA, and aggregate levels in the elution pool were dependent on the specific nature of protein being purified, and levels were consistent between stationary phases. Lastly, we perform an analysis of bivariate correlations and discuss considerations for process design and optimization.
Copyright © 2018 MedImmune. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affinity chromatography; Antibody; Bioprocessing; Dynamic binding capacity; Protein A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29685337     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.03.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  6 in total

1.  Reduce, Reuse and Recycle in Protein Chromatography: Development of an Affinity Adsorbent from Waste Paper and Its Application for the Purification of Proteases from Fish By-Products.

Authors:  Georgios E Premetis; Nikolaos E Labrou
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-27

2.  Biomanufacturing evolution from conventional to intensified processes for productivity improvement: a case study.

Authors:  Jianlin Xu; Xuankuo Xu; Chao Huang; James Angelo; Christopher L Oliveira; Mengmeng Xu; Xia Xu; Deniz Temel; Julia Ding; Sanchayita Ghose; Michael C Borys; Zheng Jian Li
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Linear flow-velocity gradient chromatography-An efficient method for increasing the process efficiency of batch and continuous capture chromatography of proteins.

Authors:  Chyi-Shin Chen; Kosei Ando; Noriko Yoshimoto; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Application of inline variable pathlength technology for rapid determination of dynamic binding capacity in downstream process development of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Rashmi P Bhangale; Rui Ye; Thomas B Lindsey; Leslie S Wolfe
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2022-02-02

5.  The pearl necklace model in protein A chromatography: Molecular mechanisms at the resin interface.

Authors:  Goncalo L Silva; Jacek Plewka; Helga Lichtenegger; Ana C Dias-Cabral; Alois Jungbauer; Rupert Tscheließnig
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Optimization of a calcium-dependent Protein A-derived domain for mild antibody purification.

Authors:  Julia Scheffel; Sara Kanje; Jesper Borin; Sophia Hober
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.857

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.