Literature DB >> 29685299

The introduction of forensic advisors in Belgium and their role in the criminal justice system.

Sonja Bitzer1, Laetitia Heudt2, Aurélie Barret2, Lore George2, Karolien Van Dijk2, Fabrice Gason2, Bertrand Renard3.   

Abstract

Forensic advisors (FA) at the National Institute for Criminalistics and Criminology (NICC), generalists in forensic science, act as an advising body to the magistrate to improve communication between the various parties involved in the investigation: magistrate, police and crime scene investigators, and forensic experts. Their role is manifold, but their main objectives are to optimise trace processing by selecting the most pertinent traces in the context of the case and by advising magistrates on the feasibility of forensic analyses in particular circumstances in regards to the latest technical advances. Despite the absence of a legal framework governing their role and involvement in judicial cases, the demand for their services has increased over the years. Initially, forensic advisors were called for complex homicide cases. Due to the proximity with the Public Prosecutor's Office, the types of offences for which their expertise was sought have become more diverse (mainly including robbery, burglary and sexual assault cases), leading to a diversity in the types of cases handled by the forensic advisors (complex, simple and review). In many of the cases they are requested for, in addition to consulting on the best analytical strategy, forensic advisors also assume the role of case coordinator regarding the seized objects and their respective analyses. Indeed, in the majority of cases treated by the FAs, two or more types of expertise have been requested and performed, either at the internal laboratories of NICC or at external laboratories. This paper explains the role of the forensic advisors in Belgium, the path that let to their current status and problems encountered.
Copyright © 2017 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Cost-effectiveness; Decision-making; Forensic generalist; Triaging

Year:  2017        PMID: 29685299     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  2 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of fibres and textiles 2016-2019.

Authors:  Laurent Lepot; Kyra Lunstroot; Kris De Wael
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  The Interest of a Systematic Toxicological Analysis Combined with Forensic Advice to Improve the Judicial Investigation and Final Judgment in Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault Cases.

Authors:  Sarah M R Wille; Karolien Van Dijck; Antje Van Assche; Vincent Di Fazio; Maria Del Mar Ramiréz-Fernandéz; Vanessa Vanvooren; Nele Samyn
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.