Literature DB >> 29685277

Silage review: Using molecular approaches to define the microbial ecology of silage.

T A McAllister1, L Dunière2, P Drouin3, S Xu4, Y Wang4, K Munns4, R Zaheer4.   

Abstract

Ensiling of forages was recognized as a microbial-driven process as early as the late 1800s, when it was associated with the production of "sweet" or "sour" silage. Classical microbiological plating techniques defined the epiphytic microbial populations associated with fresh forage, the pivotal role of lactic acid-producing bacteria in the ensiling process, and the contribution of clostridia, bacilli, yeast, and molds to the spoilage of silage. Many of these classical studies focused on the enumeration and characterization of a limited number of microbial species that could be readily isolated on selective media. Evidence suggested that many of the members of these microbial populations were viable but unculturable, resulting in classical studies underestimating the true microbial diversity associated with ensiling. Polymerase chain reaction-based techniques, including length heterogeneity PCR, terminal RFLP, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, were the first molecular methods used to study silage microbial communities. Further advancements in whole comparative genomic, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic sequencing have or are in the process of superseding these methods, enabling microbial communities during ensiling to be defined with a degree of detail that is impossible using classical microbiology. These methods have identified new microbial species in silage, as well as characterized shifts in microbial communities with forage type and composition, ensiling method, and in response to aerobic exposure. Strain- and species-specific primers have been used to track the persistence and contribution of silage inoculants to the ensiling process and the role of specific species of yeast and fungi in silage spoilage. Sampling and the methods used to isolate genetic materials for further molecular analysis can have a profound effect on results. Primer selection for PCR amplification and the presence of inhibitors can also lead to biases in the interpretation of sequence data. Bioinformatic analyses are reliant on the integrity and presence of sequence data within established databases and can be subject to low taxonomic resolution. Despite these limitations, advancements in molecular biology are poised to revolutionize our current understanding of the microbial ecology of silage. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotechnology; microbial ecology; microbiome; silage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29685277     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

1.  Validating the Use of Bovine Buccal Sampling as a Proxy for the Rumen Microbiota by Using a Time Course and Random Forest Classification Approach.

Authors:  Juliana Young; Joseph H Skarlupka; Madison S Cox; Rafael Tassinari Resende; Amelie Fischer; Kenneth F Kalscheur; Jennifer C McClure; John B Cole; Garret Suen; Derek M Bickhart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus buchneri on microbial communities during ensiling and aerobic spoilage of corn silage1.

Authors:  Shanwei Xu; Jinli Yang; Meng Qi; Brenda Smiley; William Rutherford; Yuxi Wang; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Altitudinal Distribution Patterns of Phyllosphere Microbial Communities and Their Contribution to Silage Fermentation of Kobresia pygmaea Along the Elevation Gradient on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Yuhong Bao; Tao Shao; Wenkang Wang; Pengfei Ma; Wenbo Wang; Antonio Gallo; Xianjun Yuan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Effects of a chemical additive on the fermentation, microbial communities, and aerobic stability of corn silage with or without air stress during storage.

Authors:  Érica B da Silva; Rebecca M Savage; Amy S Biddle; Stephanie A Polukis; Megan L Smith; Limin Kung
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Microbial Community and FermentationDynamics of Corn Silage Prepared withHeat-Resistant Lactic Acid Bacteria in a HotEnvironment.

Authors:  Hao Guan; Yang Shuai; Yanhong Yan; Qifan Ran; Xia Wang; Dandan Li; Yimin Cai; Xinquan Zhang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-12

6.  Microbial Community Dynamics and Natural Fermentation Profiles of Ensiled Alpine Grass Elymus nutans Prepared From Different Regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Zitong Ding; Jie Bai; Dongmei Xu; Fuhou Li; Yixin Zhang; Xusheng Guo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Co-ensiling garlic stalk with citrus pulp improves the fermentation quality and feed-nutritional value.

Authors:  Youn Hee Lee; Farhad Ahmadi; Young Il Kim; Young-Kyoon Oh; Wan Sup Kwak
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Keystone Taxa Lactiplantibacillus and Lacticaseibacillus Directly Improve the Ensiling Performance and Microflora Profile in Co-Ensiling Cabbage Byproduct and Rice Straw.

Authors:  Guilin Du; Guilong Zhang; Jiping Shi; Jingxian Zhang; Zhiguo Ma; Xiangcen Liu; Chenyang Yuan; Xiang Li; Baoguo Zhang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Monensin Alters the Functional and Metabolomic Profile of Rumen Microbiota in Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Ibukun Ogunade; Hank Schweickart; Kenneth Andries; Jerusha Lay; James Adeyemi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of sweet sorghum bagasse silage.

Authors:  Miaoyin Dong; Qiaoqiao Li; Fuqiang Xu; Shuyang Wang; Jihong Chen; Wenjian Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.