Literature DB >> 29685071

Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Johannes Lorscheider1, Pascal Benkert2, Carmen Lienert3, Peter Hänni4, Tobias Derfuss1, Jens Kuhle1, Ludwig Kappos1, Özgür Yaldizli1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No randomized controlled trials have compared the efficacy of fingolimod or natalizumab as second-line treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes after escalation to fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with clinically active RRMS.
METHODS: Using the registry of the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances, we identified patients with RRMS and ≥1 relapse in the year before switching from interferon beta or glatiramer acetate to fingolimod or natalizumab. Propensity score matching was used to select patients with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 547 included patients, 358 were matched (fingolimod, n = 179; natalizumab, n = 179). Median follow-up time was 1.8 years (interquartile range 0.9-2.9). Patients switching to natalizumab had a lower risk of relapses (incidence rate ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8, p = 0.001) and were more likely to experience EDSS improvement (hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.7, p = 0.01) compared to fingolimod. We found no differences in the proportion of patients free from EDSS progression (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.5, p = 0.62).
CONCLUSION: Natalizumab seems to be more effective in reducing relapse rate and improving disability compared with fingolimod.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; disability progression; fingolimod; natalizumab; observational study; relapse rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29685071     DOI: 10.1177/1352458518768433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  16 in total

1.  Identification of CD4+ T cell biomarkers for predicting the response of patients with relapsing‑remitting multiple sclerosis to natalizumab treatment.

Authors:  Paolo Fagone; Emanuela Mazzon; Santa Mammana; Roberto Di Marco; Flaminia Spinasanta; Maria Sofia Basile; Maria Cristina Petralia; Placido Bramanti; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Katia Mangano
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.952

2.  How do patients enter the healthcare system after the first onset of multiple sclerosis symptoms? The influence of setting and physician specialty on speed of diagnosis.

Authors:  Laura Barin; Christian P Kamm; Anke Salmen; Holger Dressel; Pasquale Calabrese; Caroline Pot; Sven Schippling; Claudio Gobbi; Stefanie Müller; Andrew Chan; Stephanie Rodgers; Marco Kaufmann; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Nina Steinemann; Jürg Kesselring; Milo A Puhan; Viktor von Wyl
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  The effectiveness of interferon beta versus glatiramer acetate and natalizumab versus fingolimod in a Polish real-world population.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kapica-Topczewska; Joanna Tarasiuk; Francois Collin; Waldemar Brola; Monika Chorąży; Agata Czarnowska; Mirosław Kwaśniewski; Halina Bartosik-Psujek; Monika Adamczyk-Sowa; Jan Kochanowicz; Alina Kułakowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of Dimethyl Fumarate vs Fingolimod and Rituximab vs Natalizumab for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jue Hou; Nicole Kim; Tianrun Cai; Kumar Dahal; Howard Weiner; Tanuja Chitnis; Tianxi Cai; Zongqi Xia
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Aggressive multiple sclerosis (2): Treatment.

Authors:  Georgina Arrambide; Ellen Iacobaeus; Maria Pia Amato; Tobias Derfuss; Sandra Vukusic; Bernhard Hemmer; Lou Brundin; Mar Tintore
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  NEDA-3 status including cortical lesions in the comparative evaluation of natalizumab versus fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Marco Puthenparampil; Chiara Cazzola; Sofia Zywicki; Lisa Federle; Erica Stropparo; Mariagiulia Anglani; Francesca Rinaldi; Paola Perini; Paolo Gallo
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.570

7.  Annualized hospitalization rate with natalizumab vs fingolimod in second-line treatment for RRMS in the public healthcare system in Brazil: A claim database approach.

Authors:  Guilherme Silva Julian; Ricardo Papaléo Rosim; Estela Cristina Carneseca; Jéssica Rigolon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Emerging Role of Extracellular Vesicles in the Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Ettore Dolcetti; Antonio Bruno; Livia Guadalupi; Francesca Romana Rizzo; Alessandra Musella; Antonietta Gentile; Francesca De Vito; Silvia Caioli; Silvia Bullitta; Diego Fresegna; Valentina Vanni; Sara Balletta; Krizia Sanna; Fabio Buttari; Mario Stampanoni Bassi; Diego Centonze; Georgia Mandolesi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Johannes Lorscheider; Pascal Benkert; Carmen Lienert; Peter Hänni; Tobias Derfuss; Jens Kuhle; Ludwig Kappos; Özgür Yaldizli
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Long-Term Effectiveness of Natalizumab in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated in the Routine Care in Greece: Results from the Multicenter, Observational 5-Year Prospective Study 'TOPICS Greece'.

Authors:  Dardiotis Efthimios; Karachalios Georgios; Alexopoulou Antonia; Gourgioti Rania; Evangelopoulos Maria-Eleutheria
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.