Literature DB >> 29685059

Hamstring Muscle Use in Women During Hip Extension and the Nordic Hamstring Exercise: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Daniel J Messer, Matthew N Bourne, Morgan D Williams, Aiman Al Najjar, Anthony J Shield.   

Abstract

Background Understanding hamstring muscle activation patterns in resistance training exercises may have implications for the design of strength training and injury prevention programs. Unfortunately, surface electromyography studies have reported conflicting results regarding hamstring muscle activation patterns in women. Objectives To determine the spatial patterns of hamstring muscle activity during the 45° hip extension and Nordic hamstring exercises in women using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods This was a cross-sectional study in which 6 recreationally active women with no history of lower-limb injury underwent fMRI on both thighs before and immediately after 5 sets of 6 bilateral eccentric contractions of the 45° hip extension exercise or the Nordic exercise. Using fMRI, the transverse (T2) relaxation times were measured from pre-exercise and postexercise scans, and the percentage increase in T2 was used as an index of muscle activation. Results The fMRI revealed a significantly higher biceps femoris long head-to-semitendinosus ratio during the 45° hip extension exercise than in the Nordic exercise (P = .028). The T2 increase after the 45° hip extension exercise was greater for the biceps femoris long head (P<.001), semitendinosus, and semimembranosus (P≤.001) than that for the biceps femoris short head. During the Nordic exercise, the T2 increase of the semitendinosus was greater than that of the biceps femoris short head (P<.001) and biceps femoris long head (P = .001). Conclusion While both exercises involve high levels of semitendinosus activation in women, the Nordic exercise preferentially recruits that muscle, while the hip extension exercise more evenly activates all the biarticular hamstrings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(8):607-612. Epub 23 Apr 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7748.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); prevention (injury); strength training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29685059     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

1.  Hamstring muscle activation and morphology are significantly altered 1-6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft.

Authors:  Daniel J Messer; Anthony J Shield; Morgan D Williams; Ryan G Timmins; Matthew N Bourne
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Recommendations for Hamstring Function Recovery After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe; Furio Danelon; Giovanni La Rosa; Gianni Nanni; Matthew Stride; Francesco Della Villa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Hamstring Injury Rehabilitation and Prevention in the Female Athlete.

Authors:  Lucy O'Sullivan; Jamie Preszler; Miho Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-10-02

4.  MRI Assessment of Swallow Muscle Activation with the Swallow Exercise Aid and with Conventional Exercises in Healthy Volunteers: An Explorative Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Rebecca T Karsten; Leon C Ter Beek; Bas Jasperse; Maarten J A van Alphen; Johannes M Peeters; Lisette van der Molen; Frans J M Hilgers; Martijn M Stuiver; Ludi E Smeele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of variations in Nordic hamstring exercise.

Authors:  Nejc Šarabon; Jan Marušič; Goran Marković; Žiga Kozinc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison between bracing and hollowing trunk exercise with a focus on the change in T2 values obtained by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yuki Muramoto; Hironobu Kuruma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.