Verity Cleland1, Meredith Nash2, Melanie J Sharman1, Suzi Claflin1. 1. 1 Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart Tasmania, Australia. 2. 2 School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart Tasmania, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: " parkrun" is a free and increasingly popular weekly 5-km walk/run international community event, representing a novel setting for physical activity (PA) promotion. However, little is known about who participates or why. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic, health, behavioral, individual, social, and environmental factors associated with higher levels of participation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Tasmania, Australia; June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy two adult parkrun participants. MEASURES: Online survey measuring sociodemographic, health, individual, social and environmental factors, parkrun participation, and PA. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics, zero-truncated Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 371) were more commonly women (58%), aged 35 to 53 years (54%), and occasional or nonwalkers/runners (53%) at registration. A total of 44% had overweight/obesity. Half had non-adult children, most spoke English at home, and 7% reported PA-limiting illness/injury/disability. Average run/walk time was 30.2 ± 7.4 minutes. Compared to regular walkers/runners at registration, nonwalkers/runners were less commonly partnered, more commonly had overweight/obesity, less physically active, and had poorer self-rated health. Multivariate analyses revealed relative parkrun participation was inversely associated with education level and positively associated with interstate parkrun participation, perceived social benefits, self-efficacy for parkrun, and intentions to participate. CONCLUSION: parkrun attracts nonwalkers/runners and population groups hard to engage in physical activity. Individual- and social-level factors were associated with higher relative parkrun participation. parkrun's scalability, accessibility, and wide appeal confers a research imperative to investigate its potential for public health gain.
PURPOSE: " parkrun" is a free and increasingly popular weekly 5-km walk/run international community event, representing a novel setting for physical activity (PA) promotion. However, little is known about who participates or why. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic, health, behavioral, individual, social, and environmental factors associated with higher levels of participation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Tasmania, Australia; June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy two adult parkrun participants. MEASURES: Online survey measuring sociodemographic, health, individual, social and environmental factors, parkrun participation, and PA. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics, zero-truncated Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 371) were more commonly women (58%), aged 35 to 53 years (54%), and occasional or nonwalkers/runners (53%) at registration. A total of 44% had overweight/obesity. Half had non-adult children, most spoke English at home, and 7% reported PA-limiting illness/injury/disability. Average run/walk time was 30.2 ± 7.4 minutes. Compared to regular walkers/runners at registration, nonwalkers/runners were less commonly partnered, more commonly had overweight/obesity, less physically active, and had poorer self-rated health. Multivariate analyses revealed relative parkrun participation was inversely associated with education level and positively associated with interstate parkrun participation, perceived social benefits, self-efficacy for parkrun, and intentions to participate. CONCLUSION: parkrun attracts nonwalkers/runners and population groups hard to engage in physical activity. Individual- and social-level factors were associated with higher relative parkrun participation. parkrun's scalability, accessibility, and wide appeal confers a research imperative to investigate its potential for public health gain.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavior; body weight; body weights and measures; epidemiologic methods; epidemiologic studies; exercise; health; health promotion; life style
Authors: Freya Oswald; Jennifer Campbell; Chloë Williamson; Justin Richards; Paul Kelly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Robert Smith; Paul Schneider; Alice Bullas; Steve Haake; Helen Quirk; Rami Cosulich; Elizabeth Goyder Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2020-06-18