Literature DB >> 29684647

Using conversation analytic methods to assess fidelity to a talk-based healthcare intervention for frequently attending patients.

Rebecca K Barnes1, Marcus Jepson2, Clare Thomas3, Sue Jackson4, Chris Metcalfe5, David Kessler6, Helen Cramer7.   

Abstract

The study aim was to assess implementation fidelity (i.e., adherence) to a talk-based primary care intervention using Conversation Analytic (CA) methods. The context was a UK feasibility trial where General Practitioners (GPs) were trained to use "BATHE" (Background,Affect,Trouble,Handling,Empathy) - a technique to screen for psychosocial issues during consultations - with frequently attending patients. 35 GPs received BATHE training between July-October 2015. 15 GPs across six practices self-selected to record a sample of their consultations with study patients at three and six months. 31 consultations were recorded. 21/26 patients in four intervention practices gave permission for analysis. The recordings were transcribed and initially coded for the presence or absence of the five BATHE components. CA methods were applied to assess delivery, focusing on position and composition of each component, and patients' responses. Initial coding showed most of the BATHE components to be present in most contacts. However the CA analysis revealed unplanned deviations in position and adaptations in composition. Frequently the intervention was initiated too early in the consultation, and the BATHE questions misunderstood by patients as pertaining to their presenting problems rather than the psychosocial context for their problems. Often these deviations resulted in reducing theoretical fidelity of the intervention as a whole. A CA approach enabled a dynamic assessment of the delivery and receipt of BATHE in situ revealing common pitfalls in delivery and provided valuable examples of more and less efficacious implementations. During the trial this evidence was used in top-up trainings to address problems in delivery and to improve GP engagement. Using CA methods enabled a more accurate assessment of implementation fidelity, a fuller description of the intervention itself, and enhanced resources for future training. When positioned appropriately, BATHE can be a useful tool for eliciting information about the wider context of the medical visit.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BATHE technique; Conversation analysis; Feasibility trial; Frequent attenders; Implementation fidelity; Primary care consultations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29684647     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  'Primary care sensitive' situations that result in an ambulance attendance: a conversation analytic study of UK emergency '999' call recordings.

Authors:  Matthew James Booker; Ali R G Shaw; Sarah Purdy; Rebecca Barnes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  A consultation-level intervention to improve care of frequently attending patients: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Authors:  Rebecca K Barnes; Helen Cramer; Clare Thomas; Emily Sanderson; Sandra Hollinghurst; Chris Metcalfe; Sue Jackson; Charlie Record; Helen Thorley; David Kessler
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  Acceptability of the BATHE technique amongst GPs and frequently attending patients in primary care: a nested qualitative study.

Authors:  Clare Thomas; Helen Cramer; Sue Jackson; David Kessler; Chris Metcalfe; Charlie Record; Rebecca K Barnes
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Examining the effectiveness of general practitioner and nurse promotion of electronic cigarettes versus standard care for smoking reduction and abstinence in hardcore smokers with smoking-related chronic disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rachna Begh; Tim Coleman; Lucy Yardley; Rebecca Barnes; Felix Naughton; Hazel Gilbert; Anne Ferrey; Claire Madigan; Nicola Williams; Louisa Hamilton; Yolanda Warren; Jenna Grabey; Miranda Clark; Anne Dickinson; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.