Literature DB >> 2968419

Determining interrater reliability of nurses' assessments of pupillary size and reaction.

S F Wilson1, J K Amling, S D Floyd, N D McNair.   

Abstract

Pupil changes provide vital information related to the cause and location, and at times, severity of disease processes which alter level of consciousness. Size and reactivity are sensitive to a variety of influences including local eye damage, functional state of brainstem, local systemic drugs, seizures and anoxia. Therefore, accurate measurement of pupillary size and reactivity is essential. The purposes of this study were to determine if pairs of nurses (1) achieved the same measurement of pupil sizes with and without an objective measure, and (2) selected the same descriptor for pupillary reaction to light. Sixty-eight pairs of nurses employed in adult and pediatric units of a large teaching hospital participated in the study. Interrater reliability of pupillary assessment of 136 nurses was determined. There was no significant difference in the reliability of nurses assessing pupillary size regardless of whether they used a penlight pupil gauge to measure or used observation without a pupil gauge. Agreement among the nurses on the pupillary size was high. Agreement on the pupillary reaction, however, was poor to good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2968419     DOI: 10.1097/01376517-198806000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs        ISSN: 0888-0395            Impact factor:   1.230


  7 in total

1.  Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments.

Authors:  DaiWai M Olson; Sonja Stutzman; Ciji Saju; Margaret Wilson; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Neurologist versus machine: is the pupillometer better than the naked eye in detecting pupillary reactivity.

Authors:  Christopher L Kramer; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Sara E Hocker
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Immediate effects of a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rob Sillevis; Joshua Cleland; Madeleine Hellman; Kristina Beekhuizen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

4.  Use of Digital Pupillometry to Measure Sedative Response to Propofol.

Authors:  Jody H Haddock; Donald E Mercante; Rose Paccione; Jacob L Breaux; Sarah E Jolley; Jessica L Johnson; Sean E Connolly; Bennett P deBoisblanc
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

5.  Revisiting the eye opening response of the Glasgow Coma Scale.

Authors:  Taopheeq Bamidele Rabiu
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01

6.  Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: The introduction of the Neurological Pupil index.

Authors:  Jeff W Chen; Zoe J Gombart; Shana Rogers; Stuart K Gardiner; Sandy Cecil; Ross M Bullock
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-06-21

7.  Pupillometry as a Measure of Listening Effort in Patients with Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Wojciech Gawęcki; Katarzyna Krzystanek; Magdalena Węgrzyniak; Renata Gibasiewicz; Małgorzata Wierzbicka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.