Literature DB >> 29684177

A novel measure of ewe efficiency for breeding and benchmarking purposes.

Nóirín McHugh1, Thierry Pabiou2, Kevin McDermott2, Eamon Wall2, Donagh P Berry1.   

Abstract

Ewe efficiency has traditionally been defined as the ratio of litter weight to ewe weight; given the statistical properties of ratio traits, an alternative strategy is proposed in the present study. The concept of using the deviation in performance of an animal from the population norm has grown in popularity as a measure of animal-level efficiency. The objective of the present study was to define novel measures of efficiency for sheep, which considers the combined weight of a litter of lambs relative to the weight of their dam, and vice versa. Two novel traits, representing the deviation in total litter weight at 40 d (DEV40L) or weaning (DEVweanL), were calculated as the residuals of a statistical model, with litter weight as the dependent variable and with the fixed effects of litter rearing size, contemporary group, and ewe weight. The deviation in ewe weight at 40-d postlambing (DEV40E) or weaning (DEVweanE) was derived using a similar approach but with ewe weight and litter weight interchanged as the dependent variable. Variance components for each trait were estimated by first deriving the litter or ewe weight deviation phenotype and subsequently estimating the variance components. The phenotypic SD in DEV40L and DEVweanL was 8.46 and 15.37 kg, respectively; the mean litter weight at 40 d and weaning was 30.97 and 47.68 kg, respectively. The genetic SD and heritability for DEV40L was 2.65 kg and 0.12, respectively. For DEVweanL, the genetic SD and heritability was 4.94 kg and 0.13, respectively. The average ewe weight at 40-d postlambing and at weaning was 66.43 and 66.87 kg, respectively. The genetic SD and heritability for DEV40E was 4.33 kg and 0.24, respectively. The heritability estimated for DEVweanE was 0.31. The traits derived in the present study may be useful not only for phenotypic benchmarking of ewes within flock on performance but also for benchmarking flocks against each other; furthermore, the extent of genetic variability in all traits, coupled with the fact that the data required to generate these novel phenotypes are usually readily available, signals huge potential within sheep breeding programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29684177      PMCID: PMC6095374          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Genetic analysis and genomic selection of stayability and productive life in New Zealand ewes.

Authors:  M A Lee; N G Cullen; S A N Newman; K G Dodds; J C McEwan; G H Shackell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint.

Authors:  L B Hansen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Measures of lamb production efficiency in a temperate grass-based system differing in ewe prolificacy potential and stocking rate.

Authors:  E Earle; T M Boland; N McHugh; P Creighton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Energy requirements for maintenance of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk.

Authors:  M Montaño-Bermudez; M K Nielsen; G H Deutscher
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake.

Authors:  B W Kennedy; J H van der Werf; T H Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Genetic parameters for cattle price and body weight from routinely collected data at livestock auctions and commercial farms.

Authors:  N Mc Hugh; R D Evans; P R Amer; A G Fahey; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Development of an index to rank dairy females on expected lifetime profit.

Authors:  M M Kelleher; P R Amer; L Shalloo; R D Evans; T J Byrne; F Buckley; D P Berry
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility in dairy cows.

Authors:  D P Berry; F Buckley; P Dillon; R D Evans; M Rath; R F Veerkamp
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 10.  Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  D P Berry; J J Crowley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of genetic merit on ewe performance and efficiency parameters.

Authors:  Nicola Fetherstone; Noirin McHugh; Tommy M Boland; Philip Creighton; Norann Galvin; Fiona M McGovern
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.