Literature DB >> 29684145

Effect of roller mill configuration on growth performance of nursery and finishing pigs and milling characteristics.

Jordan T Gebhardt1, Chad B Paulk2, Mike D Tokach1, Joel M DeRouchey1, Robert D Goodband1, Jason C Woodworth1, Jon A De Jong3, Kyle F Coble4, Charles R Stark2, Cassandra K Jones1, Steve S Dritz5.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of roller mill configuration on growth performance of nursery and finishing pigs, feed preference, and feed mill throughput. The four experimental treatments included corn ground through a roller mill using two, three, four sets of rolls in a fine-grind configuration, or four sets of rolls in a coarse grind configuration. The same roller mill was used for all configurations with the appropriate lower rolls completely open when using the two or three roll pair configurations. Across all studies, mean particle size averaged approximately 540, 435, 270, and 385 µm for the four roller mill configurations, respectively. In Exp. 1, 320 pigs (DNA 400 × 200, initially 10.7 ± 0.27 kg BW) were randomly allotted to treatments with five pigs per pen and 16 pens per treatment in a 21-d growth trial. While there were no evidence of differences observed for ADG or ADFI, pigs fed corn ground using the 4-high coarse configuration had a marginally significant (P = 0.091) improvement in G:F compared with those fed with the 2-high configuration, with others intermediate. In Exp. 2, 90 pigs (PIC 327 × 1050, initially 12.1 ± 0.25 kg BW) were randomly allotted to one of three diet comparisons to determine feed preference between the 2-high, 4-high fine, and 4-high coarse configurations. When given a choice, pigs consumed more (P < 0.05) of the diet containing corn ground through the 2-high roller mill (67%) or 4-high coarse configuration (63%) compared with corn ground through the 4-high fine configuration. In Exp. 3, 922 finishing pigs (PIC TR4 × [FAST Large white × PIC Line 2], initially 40.1 ± 0.36 kg BW) were used in a 97-d experiment with pens of pigs randomly allotted by initial BW to the same experimental treatments used in Exp. 1. There were 21 pigs per pen and 11 pens per treatment. Pigs fed corn ground with the 2-high configuration had greater (P < 0.05) ADG compared with those fed corn ground using the 3-high configuration. Pigs fed corn ground with the 4-high fine configuration had the poorest (P < 0.05) ADG. No differences were observed in G:F. Grinding rate (tonne/h) was greatest (P < 0.05) for the 4-high coarse configuration, while net electricity consumption (kWh/tonne) was lowest (P < 0.05) for the 2-high configuration and greatest for the 4-high fine configuration. In summary, nursery pig G:F tended to be greatest using the 4-high coarse configuration, and finishing pig ADG was maximized using the 2- and 4-high coarse configurations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29684145      PMCID: PMC6095261          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Enzyme supplementation and particle size of wheat in diets for nursery and finishing pigs.

Authors:  I Mavromichalis; J D Hancock; B W Senne; T L Gugle; G A Kennedy; R H Hines; C L Wyatt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs.

Authors:  K J Wondra; J D Hancock; K C Behnke; R H Hines; C R Stark
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effects of wheat source and particle size in meal and pelleted diets on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility.

Authors:  J A De Jong; J M DeRouchey; M D Tokach; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; C B Paulk; J C Woodworth; C K Jones; C R Stark
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Feed preference in pigs: relationship with feed particle size and texture.

Authors:  D Solà-Oriol; E Roura; D Torrallardona
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of particle size of yellow dent corn on physical characteristics of diets and growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  O J Rojas; Y Liu; H H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of mill type and particle size uniformity on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs.

Authors:  K J Wondra; J D Hancock; K C Behnke; C R Stark
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effects of reducing particle size of corn in lactation diets on energy and nitrogen metabolism in second-parity sows.

Authors:  K J Wondra; J D Hancock; G A Kennedy; K C Behnke; K R Wondra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  An update on modeling dose-response relationships: Accounting for correlated data structure and heterogeneous error variance in linear and nonlinear mixed models.

Authors:  M A D Gonçalves; N M Bello; S S Dritz; M D Tokach; J M DeRouchey; J C Woodworth; R D Goodband
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Optimum particle size of corn and hard and soft sorghum for nursery pigs.

Authors:  B J Healy; J D Hancock; G A Kennedy; P J Bramel-Cox; K C Behnke; R H Hines
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.159

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Influence of particle size of Enogen Feed corn and conventional yellow dent corn on lactating sow performance.

Authors:  Hadley R Williams; Mike D Tokach; Chad B Paulk; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Robert D Goodband; Steve S Dritz; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.