Literature DB >> 29684128

Understanding Australian policies on public health using social and political science theories: reflections from an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia Workshop.

Fran Baum1, Adam Graycar2, Toni Delany-Crowe1, Evelyne de Leeuw3, Carol Bacchi4, Jennie Popay5, Lionel Orchard6, Hal Colebatch7, Sharon Friel8, Colin MacDougall9, Elizabeth Harris10, Angela Lawless11, Dennis McDermott12, Matthew Fisher1, Patrick Harris13, Clare Phillips1, Jane Fitzgerald1.   

Abstract

There is strong, and growing, evidence documenting health inequities across the world. However, most governments do not prioritize policies to encourage action on the social determinants of health and health equity. Furthermore, despite evidence concerning the benefits of joined-up, intersectoral policy to promote health and health equity, it is rare for such policy approaches to be applied systematically. To examine the usefulness of political and social science theory in understanding the reasons for this disjuncture between evidence and practice, researchers and public servants gathered in Adelaide for an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia (ASSA) Workshop. This paper draws together the learnings that emerged from the Workshop, including key messages about the usefulness of various theories as well as insights drawn from policy practice. Discussions during the Workshop highlighted that applying multiple theories is particularly helpful in directing attention to, and understanding, the influence of all stages of the policy process; from the construction and framing of policy problems, to the implementation of policy and evaluation of outcomes, including those outcomes that may be unintended. In addition, the Workshop emphasized the value of collaborations among public health researchers, political and social scientists and public servants to open up critical discussion about the intersections between theory, research evidence and practice. Such critique is vital to render visible the processes through which particular sources of knowledge may be privileged over others and to examine how political and bureaucratic environments shape policy proposals and implementation action.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Determinants of health; evidence based policy; healthy public policy; politics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29684128     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  3 in total

1.  To what extent can the activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative be linked to population health outcomes using a program theory-based evaluation?

Authors:  Fran Baum; Toni Delany-Crowe; Colin MacDougall; Helen van Eyk; Angela Lawless; Carmel Williams; Michael Marmot
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Rise and demise: a case study of public health nutrition in Queensland, Australia, over three decades.

Authors:  Amanda Lee; Christina Stubbs; Dympna Leonard; Helen Vidgen; Deanne Minniecon; Mathew Dick; Katherine Cullerton; Lisa Herron
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.734

3.  Power, Process and Context in Theory Based Evaluation of Policy Implementation: A Response to Recent Commentaries.

Authors:  Angela Lawless; Fran Baum; Toni Delany; Colin MacDougall; Carmel Williams; Dennis McDermott; Helen van Eyk
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-01-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.