Literature DB >> 29684122

Technical quality of delivery care in private- and public-sector health facilities in Enugu and Lagos States, Nigeria.

Atsumi Hirose1,2, Ibrahim O Yisa3, Amina Aminu3, Nathanael Afolabi3, Makinde Olasunmbo4, George Oluka5, Khalilu Muhammad3, Julia Hussein1.   

Abstract

Private-sector providers are increasingly being recognized as important contributors to the delivery of healthcare. Countries with high disease burdens and limited public-sector resources are considering using the private sector to achieve universal health coverage. However, evidence for the technical quality of private-sector care is lacking. This study assesses the technical quality of maternal healthcare during delivery in public- and private-sector facilities in resource-limited settings, from a systems and programmatic perspective. A summary index (the skilled attendance index, SAI), was used. Two-staged cluster sampling with stratification was used to select representative samples of case records in public- and private-sector facilities in Enugu and Lagos States, Nigeria. Information to assess criteria was extracted, and the SAI calculated. Linear regression models examined the relationship between SAI and the private and public sectors, controlling for confounders. The median SAI was 54.8% in Enugu and 85.7% in Lagos. The private for-profit sector's SAI was lower than and the private not-for-profit sector's SAI was higher than the public sector in Enugu [coefficient = -3.6 (P = 0.018) and 12.6 (P < 0.001), respectively]. In Lagos, the private for-profit sector's SAI was higher and the private not-for-profit sector's SAI was lower than the public sector [3.71 (P = 0.005) and -3.92 (P < 0.001)]. Results indicate that the technical quality of private for-profit providers' care was poorer than public providers where the public provision of care was weak, while private for-profit facilities provided better technical quality care than public facilities where the public sector was strong and there was a relatively strong regulatory body. Our findings raise important considerations relating to the quality of maternity care, the public-private mix and needs for regulation in global efforts to achieve universal healthcare.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29684122     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czy032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Lancet Nigeria Commission: investing in health and the future of the nation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abubakar; Sarah L Dalglish; Blake Angell; Olutobi Sanuade; Seye Abimbola; Aishatu Lawal Adamu; Ifedayo M O Adetifa; Tim Colbourn; Afolabi Olaniyi Ogunlesi; Obinna Onwujekwe; Eme T Owoaje; Iruka N Okeke; Adebowale Adeyemo; Gambo Aliyu; Muktar H Aliyu; Sani Hussaini Aliyu; Emmanuel A Ameh; Belinda Archibong; Alex Ezeh; Muktar A Gadanya; Chikwe Ihekweazu; Vivianne Ihekweazu; Zubairu Iliyasu; Aminatu Kwaku Chiroma; Diana A Mabayoje; Mohammed Nasir Sambo; Stephen Obaro; Adesola Yinka-Ogunleye; Friday Okonofua; Tolu Oni; Olu Onyimadu; Muhammad Ali Pate; Babatunde L Salako; Faisal Shuaib; Fatimah Tsiga-Ahmed; Fatima H Zanna
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 202.731

2.  Compliance with disease surveillance and notification by private health providers in South-West Nigeria.

Authors:  Olusesan Ayodeji Makinde; Clifford Obby Odimegwu
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-04-13

3.  Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part II): Interventionism and Medicalization during Birth.

Authors:  Desirée Mena-Tudela; Susana Iglesias-Casás; Víctor Manuel González-Chordá; Águeda Cervera-Gasch; Laura Andreu-Pejó; María Jesús Valero-Chilleron
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Impact evaluation of a maternal and neonatal health training intervention in private Ugandan facilities.

Authors:  Joy Noel Baumgartner; Jennifer Headley; Julius Kirya; Josh Guenther; James Kaggwa; Min Kyung Kim; Luke Aldridge; Stefanie Weiland; Joseph Egger
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.