Literature DB >> 29684035

Heterotrophic N2-fixation contributes to nitrogen economy of a common wetland sedge, Schoenoplectus californicus.

Eliška Rejmánková1, Dagmara Sirová2, Stephanie T Castle1, Jiří Bárta3, Heather Carpenter1.   

Abstract

A survey of the ecological variability within 52 populations of class="Species">Schoenoplectus californicus (C.A. Mey.) Soják across its distributioclass="Chemical">nal raclass="Chemical">nge revealed that it is commoclass="Chemical">nly fouclass="Chemical">nd iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) limited areas, but rarely in phosphorus limited soils. We explored the hypothesis that S. californicus supplements its nitrogen demand by bacterial N2-fixation processes associated with its roots and rhizomes. We estimated N2-fixation of diazotrophs associated with plant rhizomes and roots from several locations throughout the species' range and conducted an experiment growing plants in zero, low, and high N additions. Nitrogenase activity in rhizomes and roots was measured using the acetylene reduction assay. The presence of diazotrophs was verified by the detection of the nifH gene. Nitrogenase activity was restricted to rhizomes and roots and it was two orders of magnitude higher in the latter plant organs (81 and 2032 nmol C2H4 g DW-1 d-1, respectively). Correspondingly, 40x more nifH gene copies were found on roots compared to rhizomes. The proportion of the nifH gene copies in total bacterial DNA was positively correlated with the nitrogenase activity. In the experiment, the contribution of fixed N to the plant N content ranged from 13.8% to 32.5% among clones from different locations. These are relatively high values for a non-cultivated plant and justify future research on the link between N-fixing bacteria and S. californicus production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29684035      PMCID: PMC5912779          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Growth of terrestrial as well as wetland plants in non-agricultural settings is often limited by the availability of nutrients, specifically class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">phosphorus (P) [1, 2]. Plants have evolved two broad strategies to deal with nutrient-limiting environments: (1) conservation of use; and (2) enhanced acquisition [3, 4, 5]. Resorption of nutrients from senescing to newly growing or storage organs is a typical example of a conservation of use strategy. The enhanced acquisition involves production and secretion of hydrolytical enzymes such as phosphatases in case of P limitation, or the utilization of rhizosphere bacteria that can increase the bioavailability of N through N2-fixation [6]. Bacteria capable of performing N2-fixation can colonize both root surfaces (and are referred to as “epiphytes” here) as well as the internal tissues (“endophytes”) (for review see [7]. The reduction of N2 to ammonia during its biological fixation is an energetically expensive process and the input of easily available C from roots into the plant rhizosphere can sustain high activity of root associated diazotrophs [8, 9, 10, 11]. Epiphytic diazotrophs establishing loosely organized associative relationships in the rhizosphere have been documented frequently for tropical grasses [8, 12, 13] and among wetland plants for littoral macrophytes [14, 15, 16]. Endophytic relationships of diazotrophs have been reported in a variety of plant roots and rhizomes including sugar cane, Sorghum, Miscanthus, and others [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Here we will focus on the potential role of both epiphytic and endophytic nitrogen fixation in the nutrient economy of a giant bulrush, Schoenoplectus californicus. class="Species">Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) is a large, pereclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nial, rhizomatous wetlaclass="Chemical">nd sedge reachiclass="Chemical">ng up to 6 meters iclass="Chemical">n height aclass="Chemical">nd ofteclass="Chemical">n formiclass="Chemical">ng moclass="Chemical">nospecific staclass="Chemical">nds [23]. Two varieties with similar ecology, var. califorclass="Chemical">nicus (C. class="Chemical">n class="Species">A. Meyer) Soják and var. tereticulmis (Steud.) Vegetti, are present in the southern part of its distributional range. As a dominant producer of biomass, S. californicus can impact biogeochemical cycles by providing a source of organic material and by oxygenating the rhizosphere [24]. In many regions, it plays an important role in the human economy providing raw materials for the construction of boats, all-purpose mats and handicrafts [25, 26]. In the survey of the ecological variability within 52 populations of S. californicus throughout the Western Hemisphere (Fig 1) we noticed that availability of phosphorus (P) appears to be important and this species is rarely found in P limited soils [23]. While common in the P-rich soils of Chile and the Central American highlands, the species is absent from the predominantly P limited ecosystems of the Yucatan peninsula and Cuba. Contrastingly, it is commonly found in areas known to be N limited, such as the Orinoco delta of Venezuela, the delta of the Paraná River in Argentina, and the Central Valley of California. In the entire data set from Carpenter [23], the average total soil P was 0.74 mg g-1, which is well over 0.5 mg g-1 regarded as a sufficient amount of P for wetland sediments [27]. In contrast, N availability was found to be variable but generally on the low side (average total soil N of 5.5 mg g-1), with about half of the locations containing < 4 mg g-1. No differences were found in biomass production among the populations from sites with N-limited sediments, nor did there seem to be less N in plant tissue (Table 1), therefore positive association with N-fixing diazotrophs was suspected.
Fig 1

Geographic origins of the clones used in the cultivation experiment.

The distribution of Schoenoplectus californicus in the Americas is shown in grey, the dots indicate the sampling locations [23]. The clones included in this study are indicated by letters: Variety tereticulmis EN: Ensenada, Chile; GU: Guillermo, Argentina; PT: Puente, Chile. Variety californicus CC: Copacabana, Bolivia; PU: Puno, Perú; HU: Huanchaco, Perú; SJ: San Juan, Guatemala; RW: Rockefeller, Louisiana.

Table 1

Soil and plant total nitrogen, TN, and phosphorus, TP, mg g-1, and aboveground biomass, W, from 52 populations of Schoenoplectus californicus [23].

SOILPLANT TISSUEPLANT BIOMASS
 nTNTPN/PTNTPN/PW, g m-1
Average all525.50.757.216.91.37131325
Low N group221.750.504.116.61.5011.71364
High N group308.400.919.517.11.3014.01286
P value (Mann-Whitney U-test)0.0010.010.001NS0.050.05NS

Data presented as means for the whole data set and means for low vs. high nitrogen. Note: Soil TN < 4 mg g-1 and TP < 0.5 mg g-1 in wetland sediments indicate potential N or P limitation [28]; the average tissue N in other Cyperaceae species from the N-limited region was 13.1 mg g-1 (n = 10; SD = 0.24). Biomass sampled in 2007 in the middle of the growing period (Dec-Feb Southern hemisphere, June-August Northern hemisphere).

Geographic origins of the clones used in the cultivation experiment.

The distribution of class="Species">Schoenoplectus californicus iclass="Chemical">n the Americas is showclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n grey, the dots iclass="Chemical">ndicate the sampliclass="Chemical">ng locatioclass="Chemical">ns [23]. The cloclass="Chemical">nes iclass="Chemical">ncluded iclass="Chemical">n this study are iclass="Chemical">ndicated by letters: Variety class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">tereticulmis EN: Ensenada, Chile; GU: Guillermo, Argentina; PT: Puente, Chile. Variety californicus CC: Copacabana, Bolivia; PU: Puno, Perú; HU: Huanchaco, Perú; SJ: San Juan, Guatemala; RW: Rockefeller, Louisiana. Data presented as means for the whole data set and means for low vs. high class="Chemical">nitrogen. Note: Soil TN < 4 mg g-1 aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">TP < 0.5 mg g-1 in wetland sediments indicate potential N or P limitation [28]; the average tissue N in other Cyperaceae species from the N-limited region was 13.1 mg g-1 (n = 10; SD = 0.24). Biomass sampled in 2007 in the middle of the growing period (Dec-Feb Southern hemisphere, June-August Northern hemisphere). Biological class="Chemical">nitrogen fixatioclass="Chemical">n, BNF, beloclass="Chemical">ngs to the most esseclass="Chemical">ntial biological processes aclass="Chemical">nd its kclass="Chemical">nowledge is critical to our uclass="Chemical">nderstaclass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ng of biogeochemical ecosystem fuclass="Chemical">nctioclass="Chemical">niclass="Chemical">ng [28, 29, 30]. It occurs via two primary pathways: symbiotic aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">noclass="Chemical">nsymbiotic, aclass="Chemical">nd is performed by prokaryotic orgaclass="Chemical">nisms called class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">diazotrophs that can be either autrotrophic (cyanobacteria), or heterotrophic (numerous genera of bacteria such as Azospirillum, Herbaspirillum and others [31]). Symbiotic N2-fixation is defined as the biological reduction of N2 occurring through mutualistic relationships between microorganisms (e.g., rhizobia) and plant roots (e.g., legumes). Nonsymbiotic nitrogen fixation includes fixation by the true free-living diazotrophs (e.g.,heterotrophic N2-fixation in leaf litter and soil or water) [31, 32], as well as by autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms of intercellular and epiphytic growth associated with certain species of bryophytes [33]. In the past, the majority of studies dealt with the symbiotic N2-fixation in legumes, however more recently, the important role of free-living and epiphytic N2-fixation is being acknowledged and current evidence suggests that free-living N2-fixation represents a critical N input to many terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, particularly those lacking large numbers of symbiotic N2-fixing plants [11, 21]. Most of the studies on endophytic N2-fixation have been focused on crop plants such as sugar cane and rice, while only a few studies on natural plant populations are available and none, to our best knowledge, reports endophytic diazotrophs from any Cyperaceae family. Field experiments have demonstrated that 60% or more of plant N may be provided by plant-associated biological N2-fixation in sugarcane [34, 35]. With the rapid development of molecular methods, many laboratories are now reporting on the actual bacterial composition of both epiphytic and endophytic class="Chemical">diazotrophs, or at least the detectioclass="Chemical">n of class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne eclass="Chemical">ncodiclass="Chemical">ng the Fe proteiclass="Chemical">n polypeptide of the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase enzyme. The detection of the nifH gene in the genomic DNA sample labels that particular isolate as a potential diazotroph [36]. Expression of genes associated with N2 fixation (nifH) has been demonstrated multiple times [37, 38]. Here we report the class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n activities associated with roots aclass="Chemical">nd rhizomes of a commoclass="Chemical">n macrophyte, Schoeclass="Chemical">nplectus califorclass="Chemical">nicus. Our goal was to aclass="Chemical">nswer the followiclass="Chemical">ng questioclass="Chemical">ns related to both the basic uclass="Chemical">nderstaclass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ng of class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus associated N2-fixation processes as well as applied aspects aimed at potential economical utilization of this plant: Are there any differences between class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity of roots (epiphytic) aclass="Chemical">nd rhizomes (eclass="Chemical">ndophytic) associated class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">diazotrophs and what proportion of plant N budget has been derived from N2-fixation? We predicted that root associated N2-fixation will be higher due to the higher population densities of rhizobacteria as compared to endophytic bacteria. Does class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n differ iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus populations from nutrient enriched (polluted) vs. oligotrophic (unpolluted) locations? We predicted that N2-fixation will be higher in the unpolluted areas. Are there any differences in class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n betweeclass="Chemical">n the two varieties, class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus var. tereticulmis and var. californicus? Are the presence of the nifH gene and/or the δn class="Chemical">15N sigclass="Chemical">nature of shoots good predictors of class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation?

Material and methods

The study has three components: Preliminary survey of epi- and endophytic class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n associated with class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus populations from different parts of its wide range of distribution. Regional study of epi- and endophytic class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n associated with class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus populations from the littoral zones of Lake Atitlán, Guatemala, assessing the variability of the two processes at nutrient poor and nutrient rich sites. Controlled growth experiment with two varieties of class="Species">S. californicus, origiclass="Chemical">naticlass="Chemical">ng from eight differeclass="Chemical">nt locatioclass="Chemical">ns throughout its distributioclass="Chemical">n raclass="Chemical">nge, at three differeclass="Chemical">nt N levels with a labeled class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N source to determine the contribution of N2-fixation by epi- and endophytic diazotrophs to the plant’s growth. The field permit to do research at Lake Atitlán was issued by the Autoridad para el Manejo Sustenable de la Cuenca del Lago Atitlán y su Entorno (AMSCLAE); no other field permits were required. class="Chemical">Nitrogenase activity, class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">delta 15N signature of shoots and/or rhizomes, and the presence of the nifH gene (see below) were used as indicators of a fixing capability of diazotrophs associated with the respective S. californicus populations.

Descriptions of study sites

Table 2 summarizes information on all the locations where the study plants originated from. It includes locations from Carpenter’s [23] survey of the ecological variability within populations of class="Species">S. californicus throughout the Westerclass="Chemical">n Hemisphere (Uclass="Chemical">nited States, México, Guatemala, Perú, Bolivia, Argeclass="Chemical">nticlass="Chemical">na, Chile, aclass="Chemical">nd Easter Islaclass="Chemical">nd) doclass="Chemical">ne iclass="Chemical">n 2006 aclass="Chemical">nd 2007. Rhizomes of cloclass="Chemical">nes from the geclass="Chemical">netically disticlass="Chemical">nct populatioclass="Chemical">ns were collected aclass="Chemical">nd placlass="Chemical">nted at UC Davis where they have beeclass="Chemical">n propagated aclass="Chemical">nd maiclass="Chemical">ntaiclass="Chemical">ned iclass="Chemical">n outdoor cultivatioclass="Chemical">ns. Table 2 also iclass="Chemical">ncludes descriptioclass="Chemical">n of study sites arouclass="Chemical">nd Lake Atitláclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n Guatemala aclass="Chemical">nd few additioclass="Chemical">nal sites from class="Chemical">n class="Disease">Central California and Belize.
Table 2

Characteristics of sampling locations for Schoenoplectus californicus; tere = variety tereticulmis; cali = variety californicus.

        Soil nutrients(mg g-1 dry soil)  
LocationAbbr.SpeciesVarietyLatitude D.dLongitude D.d.Altitude mTemperature oCTotal NTotal PSoil N/PPlantN/Pδ15N
PRELIMINARY SURVEY
Pucon, Chile *S. californicustere-39.277-71.98121416.1/7.40.60.51.211.7na
Saramiento, Argentina *S. californicustere-45.700-69.16226018.9/6.61.60.53.211.9na
Rio Vista, Calif., US *S. californicuscali38.133-121.68122.2/7.50.40.31.314.5na
Lindsey Slough, Calif., US *S. californicuscali38.262-121.79223.9/7.31.50.72.19.6na
Cosumnes, Calif., USS. acutus38.262-121.4385024.0/10.61.50.62.57.05.4
Cosumnes, Calif., UST. domingensis38.266-121.4395024.0/10.71.60.62.79.24.7
Deep marsh, BelizeT. domingensis18.004-88.448531.5/20.46.20.231.027.5-0.6
CASE STUDY AT ATITLÁN
Isla de Silencio, Guate.ISLAS. californicuscali14.666-91.214157523.1/14.70.30.31.011.30.9
San Marcos, GuatemalaSMS. californicuscali14.722-91.251157523.1/14.71.70.72.412.52.0
San Pedro, GuatemalaSPS. californicuscali14.677-91.138157523.1/14.71.90.82.414.2-8.2
San Lucas, GuatemalaSLS. californicuscali14.634-91.138157523.1/14.74.30.85.410.6-3.0
Santiago, GuatemalaSANS. californicuscali14.635-91.234157523.1/14.74.10.94.613.1-5.1
Panajab, GuatemalaPANS. californicuscali14.657-91.223157523.1/14.74.00.94.412.90.7
EXPERIMENT
Guillermo, Argentina *GUS. californicustere-41.36-71.51585614.2/2.43.40.56.86.70.3
Puente, Chile *PTS. californicustere-41.23-72.623914.6/6.81.30.34.311.9-0.1
Copacabana, Bolivia *CCS. californicuscali-16.147-69.075381012.1/6.94.10.85.210.91.3
Rockefeller, Louisiana *RWS. californicuscali29.709-92.8261027.8/10.23.90.68.87.1-4.0
San Juan, Guatemala *SJS. californicuscali14.698-91.284157523.1/14.71.90.72.510.3-0.6
Huanchaco, Peru *HUS. californicuscali-8.068-79.123313.9/10.08.51.27.114.722.6
Ensenada, Chile *ENS. californicustere-41.653-73.5626214.6/6.87.40.98.515.27.8
Puno, Peru *PUS. californicuscali-14.148-69.689381012.1/6.97.01.16.428.55.7

The sites of Carpenter’s survey from 2007 [23] are marked with *. Clones from all these locations have been since in the common garden cultivation at UC Davis. The first three locations from Atitlán region are from the unpolluted, the remaining three from polluted locations. The first five locations of the clones used in the experiment are from low nitrogen, the remaining from high nitrogen sampling sites. D.d. = decimal degrees; temperature average high/average low; δ15N is from the shoots in the time of collection at original locations.

The sites of Carpenter’s survey from 2007 [23] are marked with *. Clones from all these locations have been since in the common garden cultivation at UC Davis. The first three locations from Atitlán region are from the unpolluted, the remaining three from polluted locations. The first five locations of the clones used in the experiment are from low class="Chemical">nitrogen, the remaiclass="Chemical">niclass="Chemical">ng from high class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogen sampling sites. D.d. = decimal degrees; temperature average high/average low; δ15N is from the shoots in the time of collection at original locations.

Component 1: Preliminary surveys

Tests of class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n capability of epiphytic aclass="Chemical">nd eclass="Chemical">ndophytic class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">diazotrophs were conducted on Schoenoplectus californicus originating in four Central and South American locations and cultivated in the common garden in Davis. To check if the endophytic diazotrophs were also present in rhizomes and shoots of other species of a similar ecological niche, samples of Schoenoplectus acutus and a common wetland macrophyte, Typha domingensis, from few locations in the Central Valley of California (N-limited) and Belize (P-limited) were surveyed [27] (Table 2). ARA assays were run in hours following sample collection.

Component 2: Case study of Schoenoplectus californicus populations at Lake Atitlán

To assess the spatial and temporal variability of class="Species">S. californicus associated class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation and the potential impact of nutrient enrichment, we collected samples from spatially separated populations in the littoral zone of an oligo-to mesotrophic Lake Atitlán, Guatemala in August 2010 and February 2011 (Table 2)—one of the N-limited regions included in the initial Carpenter’s study [23]. Three of the locations were in the unpolluted parts of the lake, while the remaining three were at the proximity to the runoff from human settlements or other nutrient rich sources. The polluted locations were characterized by about five- and two-fold higher concentrations of total N and total P in water, respectively, compared to the unpolluted locations (polluted: TN 525 μg L-1, TP 93 μg L-1; unpolluted: TN 116 μg L-1, TP 50 μg L -1). The polluted locations had also higher TN and TP content in sediments (Table 2).

Component 3: Cultivation experiment

From the class="Species">S. californicus cloclass="Chemical">ne collectioclass="Chemical">n, we selected five cloclass="Chemical">nes origiclass="Chemical">naticlass="Chemical">ng iclass="Chemical">n the locatioclass="Chemical">ns with low N aclass="Chemical">nd three iclass="Chemical">n locatioclass="Chemical">ns with high N (Table 2; Note: Soil TN < 4 mg g-1 aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">TP < 0.5 mg g-1 in wetland sediments indicate potential N or P limitation [27]). The selection encompassed the genetic (variety tereticulmis and californicus) and geographic ranges of the species (Fig 1, Table 2). From now on the two varieties, tereticulmis and californicus, will be abbreviated as “tere” and “cali”. The plants were propagated and transplanted for 5 weeks into sterilized sand and tap water (NO3-N = 3 ppm; PO4-P = 0.2 ppm). At the beginning of the experiment, individual plants comprised of a 7-12cm long shoot with a short piece of rhizome were planted in 3 replicates for each treatment in 3L pots filled with sterilized sand. Since the plants have been in the common garden cultivation for several years, there were no differences among the plants from low vs high group in either δ15N or % N content (δ15N 4.4 ‰ +/- 0.99 SD and 4.8 ‰ +/-1.04 SD; N content 1.4% +/-0.30 SD and 1.5% +/-0.27 SD for low and high respectively). All pots received 0.25% Hoagland nutrient solution minus N. Hoagland solution was changed three times during the duration of the experiment. The zero, low, and high N treatment received biweekly 0, 20, and 200 mg/pot of N, resulting in the total addition of 0, 120, and 1200 mg N/pot (corresponding to 0, 4, and 40 g N m-2). Nitrogen was applied as KNO3 with a value δ15N of 67.74‰. All pots were placed under ambient environmental conditions in Davis, CA, in a large tub filled with water to prevent overheating. The experiment lasted 87 days (June 3-August 29; during this time, there is typically no rainfall in the Central Valley of California, thus there were no concerns regarding potential uncontrolled N addition by rain). At the end of the experiment, the cumulative length of shoots was recorded, shoots, rhizomes, and roots were separated, washed in DI, and the aliquots were used for measurement of nitrogenase activity. The remaining samples were freeze-dried, weighed, and ground for subsequent determination of δ15N, total N, and molecular analyses for nifH gene presence and abundance among samples.

Collection of samples for nitrogenase activity measurements

Four plants at each location (components 1 and 2) and one plant per pot (component 3) were extracted carefully from sediments to prevent extensive root damage and roots and rhizomes were rinsed in surface class="Chemical">water to remove adhered larger particles aclass="Chemical">nd sealed iclass="Chemical">n a plastic bag. The samples were traclass="Chemical">nsported to the laboratory, where the live roots were ideclass="Chemical">ntified by color aclass="Chemical">nd structure, riclass="Chemical">nsed iclass="Chemical">n distilled class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">water, and an equivalent of ~ 20–40 mg DW was transferred to 40 ml glass test tubes with three replicates per plant. A preliminary test was conducted to verify that this sample manipulation did not impact nitrogenase activity. In the test we compared ARA in root samples treated as described above with those that were collected, quickly rinsed in deoxygenated water and immediately placed to the fixation vials where the oxygen was lowered by exchange of part of the headspace for N2 gas. There were no significant differences in the nitrogenase activity measured by ARA for the two treatments over 2, 5, 10, 18 and 25 hours of incubation (t-test, P = 0.7). Rhizome and stem tissues were surface sterilized sequentially in sterile distilled water, 95% ethanol, and 1.6% hypochlorite for 30s each; between each step the tissues were rinsed three times with sterile water [39]. The outer, coarse surface layer of rhizomes was removed after surface sterilization, leaving only tissue that did not come in contact with the soil. Because of the complexity of the root structure, it is difficult to reliably surface sterilize these organs; we decided to consider the root-associated nitrogenase activity as a result of joint activity of both the endo- and epiphytic microorganisms. The tissue was transferred to 40 ml glass test tubes (each in three replicates) with 200 μL (for rhizomes) and 20 mL (for roots) of distilled water and fitted with Teflon septum lids.

Nitrogenase activity

The class="Chemical">acetylene reductioclass="Chemical">n techclass="Chemical">nique, ARA [40], was employed to estimate class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation by the reduction of acetylene to ethylene by nitrogenase. Ten percent of the headspace were replaced with acetylene gas, freshly generated from calcium carbide, and the bottles were incubated for 24 hours at 28 degrees C. At the end of the exposure, 7–8 mL of headspace was withdrawn with an airtight syringe (Alltech) and analyzed by gas chromatograph (Shimadzu 14 GC) with a flame ionization detector and a Porapak-T column at 80°C. The results are reported as the nitrogenase activity in nmol C2H4 g-1 d-1 of dry weight. Controls run as samples without acetylene addition as well as blanks (tubes without plant tissue incubated with acetylene) showed no endogenous ethylene production. Samples were kept for dry weight determination after terminating the exposure (see [11] for more detailed description).

Calibration of ARA through 15N2 reduction assay

On a subset of 13 root and 7 rhizome samples from the experiment, the class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity, measured usiclass="Chemical">ng the ARA, was calibrated by class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N2 reduction assay. The measurements were conducted at the same time as ARA but 2 mL of 15N2 (99atom%, Cambridge Isotope) was added instead of C2H2. At the end of the incubation, the content of the containers was frozen, freeze dried and then ground in a Wiley mill. The initial 15N natural abundance of the sample was determined from the ARA samples. The delta15N (in relation to atmospheric N2 as the reference standard material) was measured by an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (see below). Biomass specific N2 fixation rate, normalized to organic N, was calculated as isotopic balance [41, 42]: Where class="Chemical">PN is N coclass="Chemical">nceclass="Chemical">ntratioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n the sample, AP is class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N enrichment (atom% 15N) of the sample or substrate (N2) pool at the beginning (initial) and end (final) of incubation; Δt is the length of incubation. N2 fixation rate expressed in terms of fixation of molecular N2 to organic material was then calculated:

Isotope and tissue nutrient analyses

Tissue N and P concentration of shoot and rhizome samples were assessed. Stable isotopes of N were measured by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry using a PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer interfaced to a PDZ Europa 20–20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK). Dried samples containing approximately 20–150 μg N (2-3mg of sample) were packaged in tin capsules (Elemental microanalysis, Manchester, MA) and combusted at 1000°C in the elemental analyzer. The ratio of class="Chemical">15N/class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">14N (R15) was measured for the sample and for an injection of standardized N2 gas introduced into the mass spectrometer in each sample cycle. The δ15N was calculated from: and expressed on “per mil” basis. Total P was measured spectrophotometrically using class="Chemical">ascorbic acid reductioclass="Chemical">n of class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">phosphomolybdate complex after combustion and consequent acid digestion [43].

Proportion of N derived from N2-fixation

Percent of N derived from class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n was calculated for the experimeclass="Chemical">nt usiclass="Chemical">ng the two-eclass="Chemical">ndmember liclass="Chemical">near mixiclass="Chemical">ng model [44] formulated from the mass balaclass="Chemical">nce equatioclass="Chemical">ns: where δM, δA aclass="Chemical">nd δB represeclass="Chemical">nt the meaclass="Chemical">n isotopic sigclass="Chemical">natures of the mixture M aclass="Chemical">nd sources A aclass="Chemical">nd B respectively, iclass="Chemical">n our case mixture M was the isotopic sigclass="Chemical">nature of placlass="Chemical">nts at the eclass="Chemical">nd of the experimeclass="Chemical">nt, source A had the isotopic sigclass="Chemical">nature of 67.74‰ (δclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N of the nitrate-N); source B was 0‰ (δ15N of the N from the air). For the calculation of the means and confidence intervals we used the ISOERROR 1.04 Excel spreadsheet by Phillips and Greg [44].

Quantifying the presence of diazotrophs in rhizomes and roots by qPCR

The presence of class="Chemical">diazotrophs was assessed iclass="Chemical">n Atitláclass="Chemical">n rhizome samples from 2011 aclass="Chemical">nd iclass="Chemical">n selected root aclass="Chemical">nd rhizome samples from the cultivatioclass="Chemical">n experimeclass="Chemical">nt. Total DNA was extracted from class="Chemical">n class="Species">Schoenoplectus rhizomes or roots using the Power Soil DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories), according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and quantity was determined by electrophoresis and total DNA concentration in the samples was measured fluorometrically. Total bacteria (16S rDNA gene) were quantified using universal primers 341f (CCT ACGGGAGGCAGCAG) and 515r (ATTCCGCGGCTGGCA) as described by [45]. The qPCR reactions were set up using the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche). First denaturation at 95°C for 10 min was followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 45s), annealing (60°C, 30s), and extension (72°C, 30s). For the quantification of diazotrophs (nifH) the IGK3 (GCIWTHTAYGGIAARGGIGGIATHGGIAA) and DVV (ATIGCRAAICCICCRCAIACIACRTC) primers were used [46]. First denaturation at 95°C for 10 min was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 15s), annealing (58°C, 30s), and extension (72°C, 60s). Standard curves were obtained with serial 10 fold dilutions of a known amount of amplicon of the 16S rDNA and nifH genes, respectively. Amplicons were prepared from genomic DNA of E.coli for 16S RDNA gene and from Methylocystis heyeri for nifH gene. Each extraction, no-template control, and standard curve dilution was replicated three times. Average copy number per μl of reaction qPCR mixture was converted into copies of the gene per ng of total extracted DNA. Standard deviation was determined by the StepOne Software v2.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). According to threshold cycles (CT) of standards and the NTC values, a detection limit of approximately 10 to 100 gene copies per assay was achieved for nifH and 16S rDNA quantification, which corresponds to 102 to 103 gene copies per gram of dry rhizome or root dry weight.

Data analyses

Because most of the data sets exhibited variance heterogeneity (Fmax-test; [47]), we used non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis Test (Statview 5 software package), to evaluate the effect of different treatments and the effects of clones (separate for each treatment) and n class="Species">Schoenoplectus variety (separate for each treatmeclass="Chemical">nt) oclass="Chemical">n respoclass="Chemical">nse variables. For the same reasoclass="Chemical">n, class="Chemical">noclass="Chemical">n-parametric Maclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">n-Whitclass="Chemical">ney U-test was used iclass="Chemical">nstead of Studeclass="Chemical">nt’s t-test to test the differeclass="Chemical">nce betweeclass="Chemical">n meaclass="Chemical">ns of two samples.

Results

Preliminary survey

Tests of class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n capability of epiphytic aclass="Chemical">nd eclass="Chemical">ndophytic class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">diazotrophs, providing preliminary data for future research revealed that four randomly selected Schoenoplectus californicus clones from our clone collection, as well as the same species from two locations in the Central Valley of California did display nitrogenase activity. The nitrogenase activity for rhizomes ranged from 13.0 to 40.9 nmol C2H4 gDW-1d-1, while root-associated activity varied from 523 to over 2000 nmol C2H4 gDW-1d-1 (Table 3). No nitrogenase activity was found in any of the shoots (data not shown). Schoenoplectus acutus and Typha domingensis both showed nitrogenase activity related to roots, but contrary to S. californicus, we did not find any nitrogenase activity in rhizome tissue of these two species.
Table 3

Means ± standard deviation of nitrogenase activity measured as ethylene production of of epiphytic (roots) and endophytic (rhizomes) diazotrophs from Schoenoplectus californicus, S. acutus and Typha domingensis.

SpeciesLocationRhizomeRoot
(nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1)
S. californicusPucon, Chile35.1± 7.81085.4± 536.5
S. californicusPuente, Chile15.1± 4.2523.4± 318.5
S. californicusSan Juan, Guatemala40.9± 17.02012.3± 973.1
S. californicusSaramiento, Argentina11.7± 2.1na
S. californicusRio Vista, California13.0± 4.5515.7± 214.8
S. californicusLindsey Slough, California14.9± 9.4884.6± 390.7
S. acutusCosumnes, Central Valley, California1.5± 0.3112.2± 884.6
Typha domingensisCosumnes, Central Valley, California0.03465.8± 1712.4
Typha domingensisDeep marsh, Belize0.0 968.0± 368.5

The first four samples are from plants originating in Central and South American locations and cultivated in the common garden in Davis, CA.

The first four samples are from plants originating in Central and South American locations and cultivated in the common garden in Davis, CA.

Case study of BNF associated with Schoenoplectus californicus populations at Lake Atitlán

class="Chemical">Nitrogenase activity of both rhizome aclass="Chemical">nd root associated class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">diazotrophs was found in all tested samples (Table 4). Due to the large variability, only the endophytic rhizome fixation was significantly different between polluted vs. unpolluted sites, with mean values of 14 and 32 nmol C2H4 gDW-1d-1, respectively (Table 4). The nitrogenase activity associated with roots was on average more than three times higher in the unpolluted zones, although this difference was not statistically significant. There did not seem to be any trend related to time (August 2010 –rainy season vs February 2011 –dry season). No correlation was found between rhizome and root N2-fixation.
Table 4

Means ± standard deviations of nitrogenase activity of epiphytic (roots) and endophytic (rhizomes) diazotrophs measured as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1), shoot and rhizomes δ15N, and tissue N and P of Schoenoplectus californicus from unpolluted and polluted locations in the littoral of Lake Atitlán, Guatemala.

LocationDateRhizomeRootShoot δ15NRhizome δ15NShoot NStem P
  (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1)%%
Unpolluted
Isla201047± 13209± 34-4.2na1.80.13
Isla201122± 109562± 63950.9-0.21.80.16
San Marcos201043± 273012± 28060.3na1.50.1
San Marcos201112± 3348± 26421.620.16
San Pedro201136± 18157± 36-8.2-5.81.70.12
Mean322658-1.8-1.51.80.13
Polluted
San Lucas201016± 141374± 973nana1.80.13
San Lucas201114± 10151± 35-3-0.31.80.17
Santiago201118± 1211± 3-5.1-4.22.10.16
Panajab20119± 21311± 2300.70.91.80.14
Mean14712-2.5-1.21.90.15
P value 0.03 NS NSNSNSNS

2010 rainy season, 2011 dry season. P-values (Mann-Whitney U-test) indicate the significance of differences between the means for polluted versus non-polluted locations. na = not available; NS = not significant.

2010 rainy season, 2011 dry season. P-values (Mann-Whitney U-test) indicate the significance of differences between the means for polluted versus non-polluted locations. na = not available; NS = not significant. class="Chemical">Delta 15N of shoots raclass="Chemical">nged from 2.0 ‰ to -8.2 ‰ averagiclass="Chemical">ng -2.1 ‰; the rhizome δclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N ranged from 1.6 ‰ to -5.8 ‰ averaging -1.3 ‰ (Table 4). There was correlation between rhizome nitrogenase activity and rhizome δ15N (R2 = 0.69; P = 0.04; Fig 2A), but not the shoot δ15N; this despite the fact that shoot δ15N and rhizome δ15N were well correlated (R2 = 0.9; P = 0.004; Fig 2B).
Fig 2

Relationship between rhizome nitrogenase activity and rhizome δ15N (A) and shoot and rhizome δ15N (B) in Schoenoplectus californicus from Lake Atitlán; full diamond–unpolluted sites, empty diamonds–polluted sites. Each nitrogenase activity value is a mean of 3–4 replicates, isotope data were measured on pooled samples. Nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1).

Relationship between rhizome class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity aclass="Chemical">nd rhizome δclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N (A) and shoot and rhizome δ15N (B) in Schoenoplectus californicus from Lake Atitlán; full diamond–unpolluted sites, empty diamonds–polluted sites. Each nitrogenase activity value is a mean of 3–4 replicates, isotope data were measured on pooled samples. Nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1). class="Chemical">Diazotrophs (based oclass="Chemical">n the class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne preseclass="Chemical">nce) were detected iclass="Chemical">n all aclass="Chemical">nalyzed samples (Table 5). The proportioclass="Chemical">n of class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne copies amoclass="Chemical">ng the total bacterial DNA was low, but well above the method detectioclass="Chemical">n limit. It varied from 0.01 to 0.04% (Table 5). While there was a treclass="Chemical">nd of iclass="Chemical">ncreasiclass="Chemical">ng class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity with increasing nifH proportion, the correlation was not significant, however, it became significant when all availbale data were included (see the text in the Cultivation experiment subchapter).
Table 5

Nitrogenase activity of epiphytic (roots) and endophytic (rhizomes) diazotrophs measured as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1) associated with Schoenoplectus californicus from unpolluted and polluted locations in the littoral of Lake Atitlán, Guatemala and with its selected varieties in different nutrient treatments of the cultivation experiment.

Roots/ RhizomesLocation/ Treatment16S rDNA copiesng-1 DNAnif gene copies ng-1 DNAProportion nifH (%)Nitrogenase activity nmolC2H4 gDW-1 d-1
Atitlán CaserhizomesIsla18126122590.014321
StudyrhizomesSan Lucas76988418310.01086.5
rhizomesSan Lucas41966205150.01239.9
rhizomesPanajab74851829250.01248.6
rhizomesPanajab932793012570.013511.9
rhizomesSan Martin763744580.00769.8
rhizomesSan Martin766836522970.030010.8
rhizomesSantiago626980022730.036214.6
rhizomesSan Pedro936106425080.026847
rhizomesSan Pedro826636819100.023116
Cultivation Experiment
Guillermorootszero N224159117400.077696.4
GuillermorootsLow N174308312090.0694597.9
GuillermorootsHigh N257189145560.1771216.3
Puenterootszero N128333965400.5096307.9
Puenterootszero N198425215020.0757597.6
PuenterootsLow N150447825010.1662215.6
PuenterootsHigh N194116426100.1345966.1
PuenterootsHigh N233521912510.0536600.9
Rockefellerrootszero N175975435560.20212328.1
RockefellerrootsLow N22796598010.0351115.7
RockefellerrootsHigh N332910920100.06041672.4
Ensenadarootszero N261037818320.0702455.2
Ensenadarootszero N280390244200.15763252.9
EnsenadarootsLow N215647112980.0602234.6
EnsenadarootsLow N383035457110.14912327.4
EnsenadarootsHigh N237042786240.36386087.8
GuillermorhizomesHigh N1848001310.001746
PuenterhizomesHigh N3726492870.0023110
Rockefellerrhizomeszero N25421341440.0057320
RockefellerrhizomesHigh N2648460480.001855

The presence of nifH genes is expressed as copies per ng DNA or as a proportion of diazotrophs (nifH gene copies) in the total bacterial DNA pool (%).

The presence of nifH genes is expressed as copies per ng DNA or as a proportion of n class="Chemical">diazotrophs (class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne copies) iclass="Chemical">n the total bacterial DNA pool (%).

Cultivation experiment

Growth response to nitrogen treatments

Biomass of shoots, rhizomes, and roots as well as cumulative shoot length was recorded at the end of the experiment (87 days). In each treatment, all these response variables were closely correlated (R2 >0.9), thus we present total dry mass only (Table 6). As expected, the effect of the N treatment was highly significant; the plants in zero N treatment grew very slow with the average biomass per pot of 8.8 g, however, they did form new healthy shoots. The low N and high N treatments resulted in correspondingly higher biomass with 14.1 and 54.4 g per pot, respectively. The class="Chemical">tere variety produced sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly less biomass thaclass="Chemical">n cali variety iclass="Chemical">n each of the N treatmeclass="Chemical">nts. Placlass="Chemical">nts iclass="Chemical">n zero N treatmeclass="Chemical">nt iclass="Chemical">nvested more growth effort iclass="Chemical">nto roots as documeclass="Chemical">nted by a low shoot/root ratio of 0.69 as compared to 1.63 aclass="Chemical">nd 2.68 for low N aclass="Chemical">nd high N treatmeclass="Chemical">nts respectively. (Note, that “root” iclass="Chemical">n S/R ratio staclass="Chemical">nds for both roots aclass="Chemical">nd rhizomes). The tissue N coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nt was low iclass="Chemical">n zero N aclass="Chemical">nd low N treatmeclass="Chemical">nt, 0.60 aclass="Chemical">nd 0.85% respectively, aclass="Chemical">nd sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly higher, 1.71%, for high N treatmeclass="Chemical">nt. Iclass="Chemical">n low aclass="Chemical">nd high N treatmeclass="Chemical">nt, the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">tere variety contained more N in shoot tissue than cali. Nearly all the N added to the low N treatment pots was recovered in the biomass of plants in the low N treatments.
Table 6

Means ± standard deviations of response variables of Schoenoplectus californicus to nitrogen treatment.

 CloneDWS/RN%N-fix RhizomeN-fix RootNdfaδ15N
ZGU3.9± 1.40.19± 0.180.56± 0.2048.7± 9.867± 25N/A4.2± 1.9
PT6.8± 2.20.79± 0.080.47± 0.0322.7± 8.3420± 155N/A4.7± 1.2
EEN5.0± 0.50.45± 0.290.66± 0.3082.2± 44.61593± 1469N/A 1.5± 0.8
CC11.0± 3.50.57± 0.180.56± 0.1288.0± 36.7254± 89N/A4.7± 0.6
RRW12.1± 2.80.82± 0.220.68± 0.1137.67± 72.31384± 1334N/A2.9± 0.4
SJ9.8± 1.70.44± 0.080.72± 0.1784.7± 27.1909± 226N/A3.4± 0.4
OHU9.2± 1.81.21± 0.450.54± 0.03162.2± 96.5608± 590N/A0.2± 0.2
PU12.9± 5.00.45± 0.020.60± 0.13128.3± 50.31136± 42N/A0.9± 0.4
8.80.690.60124.2745.12.8
GU7.5± 0.51.5± 0.701.30± 0.1068.4± 61.3341± 22414.7± 0.958.4± 0.8
LPT11.5± 1.71.6± 0.200.80± 0.0949.6± 11.2238± 13317.8± 3.656.5± 2.3
EN9.6± 0.11.5± 0.901.01± 0.19193.4± 43.31632± 98426.1± 10.050.5± 6.6
OCC15.1± 2.91.6± 0.500.75± 0.2243.2± 7.0223± 14226.5± 3.751± 2.4
RW13.9± 3.02.2± 0.400.88± 0.0877.9± 25.8360± 29124.2± 4.951.8± 2.9
WSJ13.1± 1.41.3± 0.100.75± 0.0699.8± 52.0934± 11634.1± 18.645.7± 12.0
HU19.5± 2.42.1± 0.400.75± 0.1990.3± 0.2361± 2322.6± 1.752.5± 1.2
PU22.2± 2.11.2± 0.200.58± 0.07261.6± 32.5828± 35830.6± 6.947.3± 4.6
14.11.630.85110.6614.623.751.7
HGU11.9± 5.33.0± 0.702.31± 0.1283.9± 33.3312± 2461.5± 1.666.9± 1.2
PT32.3± 7.33.1± 1.301.91± 0.22112.8± 25.2889± 2582.7± 2.466.5± 2.3
IEN35.5± 9.32.8± 0.701.87± 0.29217.3± 153.64219± 16212.7± 2.766.3± 2.4
CC65.8± 11.52.0± 0.101.79± 0.17137.9± 40.22256± 11010.5± 0.967.9± 0.9
GRW43.9± 4.33.1± 0.901.60± 0.1373.9± 62.82779± 9722.6± 3.666.9± 3.5
SJ61.8± 2.42.6± 0.301.50± 0.08171.4± 10.45380± 296.8± 8.363.4± 5.3
HHU74.0± 9.53.1± 0.201.22± 0.08185.8± 190.83912± 21131.5± 2.367± 1.8
PU111.1± 19.01.8± 0.201.48± 0.08460.9± 32.42922± 13872.8± 0.865.8± 0.6
54.42.681.71180.52833.72.166.3
Effect               
TREATMENT0.0010.00010.00010.080.00010.00010.0001
CLONE zero N0.050.07NS0.020.05-0.01
CLONE low N0.01NS0.050.10NS0.050.08
CLONE high N0.004NS0.010.100.03NSNS
VAR zero N0.001NS0.070.002NS-0.10
VAR low N0.0004NS0.01NSNS0.010.01
VAR hig hN0.0001 NS 0.01 NS 0.03 NS NS 

Zero = no nitrogen added; Low = 120 mg N per pot; High = 1200 mg N per pot; DW = dry mass at the end of the experiment in g per pot; S/R = aboveground to belowground biomass ratio; N% = aboveground tissue N content; N-fix Rhizome = endophytic N2 fixation and N-fix Root = epiphytic N2 fixation, both measured as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1d-1); Ndfa % = proportion of N in the shoots from N fixation; shoot δ15N in ‰ at the end of the experiment. Guiellermo, GU, Puente, PT, and Ensenada, EN, are clones of variety tereticulmis; Copacabana, CC, Rockefeller, RW, San Juan, SJ, Huanchaco, HU, Puno, PU, are clones of variety californicus.

Zero = no class="Chemical">nitrogen added; Low = 120 mg N per pot; High = 1200 mg N per pot; DW = dry mass at the eclass="Chemical">nd of the experimeclass="Chemical">nt iclass="Chemical">n g per pot; S/R = abovegrouclass="Chemical">nd to belowgrouclass="Chemical">nd biomass ratio; N% = abovegrouclass="Chemical">nd tissue N coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nt; N-fix Rhizome = eclass="Chemical">ndophytic class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2 fixation and N-fix Root = epiphytic N2 fixation, both measured as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1d-1); Ndfa % = proportion of N in the shoots from N fixation; shoot δ15N in ‰ at the end of the experiment. Guiellermo, GU, Puente, PT, and Ensenada, EN, are clones of variety tereticulmis; Copacabana, CC, Rockefeller, RW, San Juan, SJ, Huanchaco, HU, Puno, PU, are clones of variety californicus.

Response of nitrogenase activity to nitrogen treatments

We found evidence of endophytic (rhizome) class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n all treatmeclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd all cloclass="Chemical">nes. The activity fluctuated coclass="Chemical">nsiderably, raclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng from 22.7 class="Chemical">nmol class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">C2H4 g DW-1d-1 to 460 nmol C2H4 g DW-1d-1 (Table 6, Fig 3). There were no differences between zero and low N treatments because of the large variability, but rhizome nitrogenase activities in low and high N treatment were closely correlated (R2 = 0.81; P = 0.002). Rhizome fixation was significantly lower in the tere variety. Root (epiphytic) nitrogenase activity was also highly variable and did not differ between zero and low N treatment, while it was on average about 4x higher in high N treatment. Root nitrogenase activity was positively correlated among all three treatments. Endo- and epiphytic fixations were not correlated except for the low N treatment (positive correlation; R2 = 0.51; P = 0.05).
Fig 3

Nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1) of endophytic bacteria (RHIZOMES) and epiphytic bacteria (ROOTS) of Schoenoplectus californicus in the experiment.

X-axis: Clones Guillermo, GU, Puente, PT and Ensenada, EN are of variety tereticulmis; Copacabana, CC, Rockefeller, RW, San Juan, SJ, Huanchaco, HU, and Puno, PU are clones of variety californicus. The error bars indicate the standard error of the mean; n = 3.

Nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1) of endophytic bacteria (RHIZOMES) and epiphytic bacteria (ROOTS) of Schoenoplectus californicus in the experiment.

X-axis: Clones Guillermo, GU, Puente, PT and Ensenada, EN are of variety n class="Chemical">tereticulmis; Copacabaclass="Chemical">na, CC, Rockefeller, RW, Saclass="Chemical">n Juaclass="Chemical">n, SJ, Huaclass="Chemical">nchaco, HU, aclass="Chemical">nd Puclass="Chemical">no, PU are cloclass="Chemical">nes of variety califorclass="Chemical">nicus. The error bars iclass="Chemical">ndicate the staclass="Chemical">ndard error of the meaclass="Chemical">n; class="Chemical">n = 3.

Proportion of N from N2-fixation (Ndfa)

For the low N and high N treatments, we used the mixing model to calculate the proportion of N derived from class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">Ndfa). In the low N treatment, we found differences in the contribution to the plant N content among clones from different locations ranging from 13.8% for Guillermo to 32.5% for San Juan (Fig 4). Variety cali utilized the N from N2-fixation significantly more than tere (Ndfa 26.3% and 18.6%, respectively; Mann-Whitney U-test; P = 0.01). In the high N treatment the Ndfa was very low (0.5 to 6.4%) and the differences between clones were not significant, although San Juan location, SJ, had the highest proportion of N from N2-fixation in both treatments. No differences between varieties were found in the high N treatment.
Fig 4

The proportion of N derived from N2 fixation (Ndfa). X-axis: Clones Guillermo, GU, Puente, PT and Ensenada, EN are of variety tereticulmis; Copacabana, CC, Rockefeller, RW, San Juan, SJ, Huanchaco, HU, and Puno, PU are clones of variety californicus.

Note the differences in the y-axes. The error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 3).

The proportion of N derived from N2 fixation (Ndfa). X-axis: Clones Guillermo, GU, Puente, PT and Ensenada, EN are of variety tereticulmis; Copacabana, CC, Rockefeller, RW, San Juan, SJ, Huanchaco, HU, and Puno, PU are clones of variety californicus.

Note the differences in the y-axes. The error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 3). Similarly to the Atitlán case study, there was a negative correlation between rhizome class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity aclass="Chemical">nd rhizome δclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N in both zero and high N treatments (Fig 5). Not enough data on rhizome δ15N were available to calculate correlations for low N treatment. Rhizome and shoot δ15N values were significantly positively correlated in zero treatment (R2 = 0.66; P = 0.05), while non-significant positive trend was found in high N treatment (R2 = 0.43; P = 0.15).
Fig 5

Relationship between rhizome nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1).and rhizome δ15N in Schoenoplectus californicus from the cultivation experiment zero N treatment (A) and high treatment (B). Each nitrogenase activity value is a mean of 3 replicates, isotope data are measured on pooled samples.

Relationship between rhizome class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity expressed as class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1).and rhizome δ15N in Schoenoplectus californicus from the cultivation experiment zero N treatment (A) and high treatment (B). Each nitrogenase activity value is a mean of 3 replicates, isotope data are measured on pooled samples. On average 40x more nifH gene copies were found in the root material than in the rhizomes (Table 5). When the n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity was plotted agaiclass="Chemical">nst the proportioclass="Chemical">n of class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne for all samples (rhizomes from the Atitláclass="Chemical">n case study aclass="Chemical">nd roots aclass="Chemical">nd rhizomes from the cultivatioclass="Chemical">n experimeclass="Chemical">nt), the correlatioclass="Chemical">n was highly sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt (Fig 6).
Fig 6

Relationship between nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1) and proportion of nifH genes in total bacterial DNA.

Combined data from Atitlán case study and the cultivation experiment.

Relationship between nitrogenase activity expressed as ethylene production (nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1) and proportion of nifH genes in total bacterial DNA.

Combined data from Atitlán case study and the cultivation experiment.

Calibration of ARA through 15N2 reduction assay

In both rhizomes and roots, the class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity measured by ARA was correlated closely to the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">15N2 reduction (rhizomes: y = 2.785x; r2 = 0.98, roots: y = 2.38x; r2 = 0.87) denoting that the C2H4 reduction: N2 reduction ratio was 2.78: 1 and 2.38: 1 for rhizomes and roots respectively.

Discussion

Our hypothesis that endophytic and epiphytic class="Chemical">diazotrophs are associated with rhizomes aclass="Chemical">nd roots of Schoeclass="Chemical">nplectus califorclass="Chemical">nicus throughout its distributioclass="Chemical">nal raclass="Chemical">nge aclass="Chemical">nd that the placlass="Chemical">nt is capable of utiliziclass="Chemical">ng the fixed N has beeclass="Chemical">n coclass="Chemical">nfirmed by several liclass="Chemical">nes of evideclass="Chemical">nce (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity, presence of nifH gene, and δ15N data). There is very little information available on class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n associated with members of the Cyperaceae family aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">noclass="Chemical">ne that would relate to eclass="Chemical">ndophytic class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation. Rhizosphere diazotrophs associated with Schoenoplectus americanus, a close relative of S. californicus, were reported to fix 367 ± 46 ng 15N per plant per hour [9]. A direct comparison is difficult because of differences in the experimental setting, but using our C2H4: N2 ratio of 2.38 (see results) and shoot: root ratio of ~ 1 [9], their value would translate to some 20,000 nmol C2H4 g-1d-1, i.e., an order of magnitude higher value compared to our data. This is potentially explainable by the fact that Dakora and Drake used intact plants for measurements and thus diazotrophs had an unrestricted access to root carbon exudates (see below). Root associated diazotroph activity in the same range as Schoenoplectus californicus has been reported for Cyperus papyrus, a dominant species of tropical swamps in Africa [16]. Eleocharis spp. from marshes in Belize displayed root associated N2 fixation on the order of 3000 to 4000 nmol C2H4 g-1d-1 under conditions unlimited by carbon [11]. As for the wetland plants other than Cyperaceae, Eckard and Biesboer [14] reported the nitrogenase activity of 217 and 226 C2H4 g-1d-1 for Typha latifolia and T. angustifolia, respectively, and they concluded that populations of Typha may receive as little as 1–2% of their annual N requirement from N2-fixation.

Are there any differences between N2-fixation of roots (epiphytic) and rhizomes (endophytic) associated diazotrophs?

Our prediction that the root associated class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n will be higher thaclass="Chemical">n eclass="Chemical">ndophytic class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation was correct. In the Atitlán data set as well as in the cultivation experiment, the epiphytic N2-fixation was 6 to 60 times higher than the endophytic N2-fixation. This is in agreement with the general consensus that endophytic bacteria occur at lower population densities than surface associated epiphytic bacteria [22]. This difference can also result from the way we present the results, i.e., as nitrogenase activity per grams of dry weight. Because of their bulky structure, Schoenoplectus rhizomes have relatively large proportion of a “ballast” biomass, while fine roots provide a large surface area for diazotrophs to attach to. In the case of S. californicus with its extensive root structure, it seems possible that the plants benefit more from the epiphytic bacteria, but at this point it is still just a speculation. We assume that the diazotrophs in the root samples are epiphytic, but since we did not sterilize the roots, we cannot really exclude the possibility of endophytic root diazotrophs being present.

The importance of carbon limitation

The presence of a constant C supply as energy source is an important criterion to be satisfied for the class="Chemical">diazotrophs [10, 48]. It is quite probable that the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation of both rhizomes and roots in our measurements was underestimated, because in our experimental setting the diazotrophs on excised roots/in rhizomes did not have access to the natural and continuous input of C. A recent trial showed that, with the addition of glucose, the root fixation was on average 6x higher (Rejmánková, unpublished data). Dalton et al. [37] reported a 9-fold increase in the nitrogenase activity associated with roots of Elymus mollis after the roots have been immersed in 1% glucose prior to the incubation treatment. Lower N2 fixation was reported on excised roots of Cyperus papyrus compared to fixation on intact roots [16] and the C limitation has been further demonstrated by other authors [22, 49]. Based on the increased N2 fixation caused by the enhanced photosynthate supply to root-associated diazotrophs, Dakora and Drake [9] suggest that, as in legumes, a direct relationship exists between C supply and N yield from N2-fixation associated with the Cyperaceae. The relationship between C exudates and the diazotroph activity associated should be explored further.

Ndfa

Estimates of class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity provide importaclass="Chemical">nt iclass="Chemical">nformatioclass="Chemical">n but it may class="Chemical">not reflect the amouclass="Chemical">nt of N actually utilized by placlass="Chemical">nts. The proportioclass="Chemical">n of N a placlass="Chemical">nt obtaiclass="Chemical">ns from class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N2-fixation is more meaningful. In our low N addition treatment, the Ndfa ranged from 13.8% to 32.5% and was higher in the cali variety as compared to the tere (26.3% and 18.6%, respectively). The available data on N2-fixation contribution vary greatly and generally seem to be higher in plants artificially inoculated with a single strain or a mix of N-fixing bacteria. Field studies with “wild”, non-inoculated plants report N2-fixation contributions ranging from 0 to 30% [13, 50]. The “engineered” plants, on the other hand, often obtain more than 50% of N from BNF (e.g., sugarcane: 34.8–58.8% [51]; rice variety BAS-370 close to 70% [52]; Pennisetum 50% [12]; poplar 65% [20], etc.). Presently, S. californicus is an important economical plant in several regions, where it is used for boat construction or/and mat weaving [26], but the demand is still covered by natural production. Should the larger demand for this species occur, inoculation trials with endophytic diazotrophs may become important.

Constitutive endophytic N2-fixation

class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n with its very high eclass="Chemical">nergy requiremeclass="Chemical">nt should, theoretically, dowclass="Chemical">n-regulate where there is high N availability iclass="Chemical">n the soil [29]. Iclass="Chemical">n our experimeclass="Chemical">nt, we surprisiclass="Chemical">ngly fouclass="Chemical">nd a larger class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity in both rhizomes and roots in high N treatments than in zero N treatment. This could be potentially explained by localized depletion of available N in parts of the rhizosphere. Towards the end of the experiment, plants in high N treatment were growing vigorously and some could have used most/all of added N. This would activate diazotrophs, which would likely perform well due to high quality carbon released as exudates from well growing plants. It would be in principle similar to what Hedin et al. [53] call the nitrogen paradox, where in the case of tropical forests, BNF from free living diazotrophs can occur in N-limited areas of the forest separated from areas of abundant N, allowing N2 fixation to continue in these specific areas, despite the ecosystem being N-rich as a whole. Field data from Atitlán indicated that there was a trend towards lower BNF in the rhizosphere diazotrophs and a significantly lower BNF in the endophytic diazotrophs among populations from polluted areas. This confirmed our prediction that the N2-fixation will be higher in the unpolluted areas, while in the enriched locations, plants will be utilizing N available in sediments.

Are there any differences in N2-fixation between the two varieties of S. californicus?

The finding that class="Species">S. californicus var. califorclass="Chemical">nicus coclass="Chemical">nsisteclass="Chemical">ntly displays higher class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity as well as higher Ndfa than the variety tereticulmis was unexpected. Considering that the clones used for this experiment had been in cultivation in Davis for several years prior to the experiment, the result could not have been due to priming of the original locations. It demonstrates that the taxonomic identity can have an important effect on the N acquisition strategy and is in agreement with Wurzburger and Hedin’s [54] finding that taxonomic identity was the major determinant of fixation across a broad soil P gradient in lowland tropical forests, and that soil nutrients had no or only limited influence on N2 fixation. The fact that one of the varieties seems to be capable of utilizing larger proportion of N from BNF may become important if there ever is a need to increase the production of this species.

Is the presence of nifH gene a good predictor of N2-fixation?

The presence of nifH gene means that that bacterial community has the potential to perform class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n, class="Chemical">not class="Chemical">necessarily that the process itself is preseclass="Chemical">nt. Although the proportioclass="Chemical">n of class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne copies amoclass="Chemical">ng the total bacterial DNA was relatively low, iclass="Chemical">n the samples from the cultivatioclass="Chemical">n experimeclass="Chemical">nt, the class="Chemical">nifH geclass="Chemical">ne quaclass="Chemical">ntity iclass="Chemical">n both the root surface associated aclass="Chemical">nd eclass="Chemical">ndophytic bacteria was well correlated with the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity measured. The correlation was much weaker in (a much smaller) data set from the Atitlán case study. However, this correlation need not always be strong, because nifH genes are also present in DNA of inactive or non-living microbes (for example [55]). To the extent that nifH gene copy number reflects diazotroph abundance, the S. californicus strategy may be that of maintaining relatively low abundances of highly efficient diazotrophs on their root systems. Our data suggest that many of the diazotrophs on S. californicus roots or rhizomes were indeed alive and active, despite the fact that, in both types of experiments, they likely experienced a limitation by available plant-derived C. Measurements of N2-fixation using excised roots may underestimate the activity on intact roots. Unfortunately, other methods of assessing N2-fixation activity on intact roots are too technically challenging to be used routinely or under field conditions. Because of these limitations, the nifH gene does seem to be a good additional marker for the presence of N2-fixation in S. californicus associated bacteria. Considering the difference among the two S. californicus varieties, it remains to be assessed how the bacterial community composition varies among them, as well as how it varies between the endophytic and epiphytic bacteria.

What can we learn from stable isotope signatures?

How does δclass="Chemical">15N sigclass="Chemical">nature support our hypothesis that class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus utilizes N from BNF by its associated bacteria? The best answer comes from the field data from Atitlán, where the δ15N of S. californicus shoots averaged -2.1 ‰ (Table 4), as compared to the other, presumably non-fixing lake littoral species ranging from 3.4 ‰ (Typha domingensis) and 4.6 ‰ (submersed spp.) to 4.9 ‰ (Salix humboltiana) (Rejmánková, unpublished data). The average littoral sediment δ15N of 3.4 ‰ is close to the values measured in the non-fixing species. Similarly, in the field collection of the S. californicus clones, the δ15N clones from low N locations averaged 0.6 ‰, while in the N rich locations it was 12.0 ‰ (Table 2). Although, as many authors pointed out, the assumption that the δ15N of leaf tissues reflects that of the N source in the soil is not always valid [56, 57], plant isotope composition is more likely to reflect that of the N source when plant demand exceeds N supply [58],—this is clearly the case of N-limited wetlands throughout the S. californicus distributional range.

Potential N budget

Data from our experiment demonstrated that in the low N addition treatment on average 24% N was derived from class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n. For the SJ cloclass="Chemical">ne origiclass="Chemical">naticlass="Chemical">ng at Lake Atitláclass="Chemical">n, this proportioclass="Chemical">n was 34%. How does this agree with a budget calculated from eclass="Chemical">ndophytic aclass="Chemical">nd epiphytic class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogenase activity using Atitlán originated material? The average nitrogenase activities for plants from nutrient un-enriched locations were 37.1 and 2567.7 nmol C2H4 gDW-1 d-1, respectively. If we assume the average biomass of 400 g m-2, 300 g m-2, and 300 g m-2 for the aboveground stems, rhizomes, and roots, respectively (the biomass proportion from Castle, unpublished data), the longevity of plants one year, and the tissue N of 1.8%, then the plant would require 18g of N m-2 y-1. With the C2H4 reduction: N2 reduction ratio of 2.8: 1 and 2.4: 1 for rhizomes and roots, respectively (see results), the contribution of rhizosphere and endophytic N2-fixation would represent 19%. This value is lower than Ndfa from the experiment and this is assuming all fixed N is available to plants. Several reasons may be responsible: the longevity of plants may be higher; we may have underestimated the fixation by measuring it on excised roots (see above); and the conditions during the experiment in Davis may have been more favorable.

Conclusion

Although the absolute contribution of class="Chemical">N2-fixatioclass="Chemical">n is difficult to determiclass="Chemical">ne, our results show that the N budget of class="Chemical">n class="Species">S. californicus is substantially subsidized by fixed N. In support of this, there have been multiple observations that throughout its range, in the areas heavily impacted by sewage inflow, Schoenoplectus is being outcompeted by Typha domingensis (Rejmánková, unpublished data). The S. californicus system represents a suitable model for future studies on the effects of non-symbiotic N2 fixation on the geographical distribution of plant species and varieties, plant physiology, or inter-species competition. As S. californicus is also an important plant for many native communities throughout Central and South America and is a species commonly used in constructed wetlands and wastewater treatment, the information presented in this paper may also help to improve its more applied functional roles.
  19 in total

1.  Taxonomic identity determines N2 fixation by canopy trees across lowland tropical forests.

Authors:  Nina Wurzburger; Lars O Hedin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 2.  Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts.

Authors:  Mónica Rosenblueth; Esperanza Martínez-Romero
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Biological nitrogen fixation and biomass accumulation within poplar clones as a result of inoculations with diazotrophic endophyte consortia.

Authors:  Jenny L Knoth; Soo-Hyung Kim; Gregory J Ettl; Sharon L Doty
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 4.  Living inside plants: bacterial endophytes.

Authors:  Barbara Reinhold-Hurek; Thomas Hurek
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 7.834

5.  Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions.

Authors:  Peter M Vitousek; Stephen Porder; Benjamin Z Houlton; Oliver A Chadwick
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Nutrient resorption in wetland macrophytes: comparison across several regions of different nutrient status.

Authors:  Eliska Rejmánková
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes.

Authors:  Donald L Phillips; Jillian W Gregg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of model root exudates on structure and activity of a soil diazotroph community.

Authors:  Helmut Bürgmann; Stefan Meier; Michael Bunge; Franco Widmer; Josef Zeyer
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  A Simple, High-Precision, High-Sensitivity Tracer Assay for N(inf2) Fixation.

Authors:  J P Montoya; M Voss; P Kahler; D G Capone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Endophytic nitrogen fixation in dune grasses (Ammophila arenaria and Elymus mollis) from Oregon.

Authors:  David A Dalton; Sasha Kramer; Nico Azios; Suzanne Fusaro; Elizabeth Cahill; Christina Kennedy
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 4.194

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diversity of soil nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the rhizosphere and non-rhizophere soils of Ebinur Lake Wetland.

Authors:  Xue Zhang; Wenge Hu; Xitong Jin; Ting Chen; Yanhui Niu
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Nitrogen fixation: a poorly understood process along the freshwater-marine continuum.

Authors:  Amy M Marcarelli; Robinson W Fulweiler; J Thad Scott
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr Lett       Date:  2021-10-29

3.  Dry Wetlands: Nutrient Dynamics in Ephemeral Constructed Stormwater Wetlands.

Authors:  Carolyn L Macek; Rebecca L Hale; Colden V Baxter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 3.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.