Literature DB >> 29683993

Impact of Improved HIV Care and Treatment on PrEP Effectiveness in the United States, 2016-2020.

Nidhi Khurana1, Emine Yaylali1,2, Paul G Farnham1, Katherine A Hicks3, Benjamin T Allaire4, Evin Jacobson1, Stephanie L Sansom1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of improving diagnosis, care, and treatment of persons living with HIV (PLWH) on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectiveness in the United States has not been well established.
METHODS: We used a dynamic, compartmental model that simulates the sexually active US population. We investigated the change in cumulative HIV incidence from 2016 to 2020 for 3 HIV care-continuum levels and the marginal benefit of PrEP compared with each. We also explored the marginal benefit of PrEP for individual risk groups, and as PrEP adherence, coverage and dropout rates varied.
RESULTS: Delivering PrEP in 2016 to persons at high risk of acquiring HIV resulted in an 18.1% reduction in new HIV infections from 2016 to 2020 under current care-continuum levels. Achieving HIV national goals of 90% of PLWH with diagnosed infection, 85% of newly diagnosed PLWH linked to care at diagnosis, and 80% of diagnosed PLWH virally suppressed reduced cumulative incidence by 34.4%. Delivery of PrEP in addition to this scenario resulted in a marginal benefit of 11.1% additional infections prevented. When national goals were reached, PrEP prevented an additional 15.2% cases among men who have sex with men, 3.9% among heterosexuals, and 3.8% among persons who inject drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: The marginal benefit of PrEP was larger when current HIV-care-continuum percentages were maintained but continued to be substantial even when national care goals were met. The high-risk men who have sex with men population was the chief beneficiary of PrEP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29683993     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  18 in total

1.  A novel method to estimate the indirect community benefit of HIV interventions using a microsimulation model of HIV disease.

Authors:  Pooyan Kazemian; Sydney Costantini; Anne M Neilan; Stephen C Resch; Rochelle P Walensky; Milton C Weinstein; Kenneth A Freedberg
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Treatment Is More Than Prevention: Perceived Personal and Social Benefits of Undetectable = Untransmittable Messaging Among Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV.

Authors:  H Jonathon Rendina; Ali J Talan; Jorge Cienfuegos-Szalay; Joseph A Carter; Ore Shalhav
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.078

3.  Are Unequal Policies in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Needed to Improve Equality? An Examination Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Anthony Nguyen; Emmanuel Fulgence Drabo; Wendy H Garland; Corrina Moucheraud; Ian W Holloway; Arleen Leibowitz; Sze-Chuan Suen
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 5.944

4.  Using Microsimulation Modeling to Inform EHE Implementation Strategies in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Emmanuel F Drabo; Corrina Moucheraud; Anthony Nguyen; Wendy H Garland; Ian W Holloway; Arleen Leibowitz; Sze-Chuan Suen
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.771

5.  Evidence of an Association of Increases in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Coverage With Decreases in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Diagnosis Rates in the United States, 2012-2016.

Authors:  Dawn K Smith; Patrick S Sullivan; Betsy Cadwell; Lance A Waller; Azfar Siddiqi; Robertino Mera-Giler; Xiaohong Hu; Karen W Hoover; Norma S Harris; Scott McCallister
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Discontinuation Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in Atlanta, Georgia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  David P Serota; Eli S Rosenberg; Patrick S Sullivan; Annie L Thorne; Charlotte-Paige M Rolle; Carlos Del Rio; Scott Cutro; Nicole Luisi; Aaron J Siegler; Travis H Sanchez; Colleen F Kelley
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A modeling framework to inform preexposure prophylaxis initiation and retention scale-up in the context of 'Getting to Zero' initiatives.

Authors:  Aditya S Khanna; John A Schneider; Nicholson Collier; Jonathan Ozik; Rodal Issema; Angela di Paola; Abigail Skwara; Arthi Ramachandran; Jeannette Webb; Russell Brewer; William Cunningham; Charles Hilliard; Santhoshini Ramani; Kayo Fujimoto; Nina Harawa
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Reported preexposure prophylaxis use among male sex partners of HIV-positive men: 2016-2018.

Authors:  Linda Beer; Yunfeng Tie; Dawn K Smith; Jennifer L Fagan; R Luke Shouse
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.632

9.  Reaching Those Most at Risk for HIV Acquisition: Evaluating Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Preexposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum in Baltimore City, Maryland.

Authors:  Christina M Schumacher; Xueting Tao; Aruna Chandran; Errol Fields; Ashley Price; Adena Greenbaum; Jacky M Jennings
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.771

10.  Optimal Allocation of Societal HIV Prevention Resources to Reduce HIV Incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie L Sansom; Katherine A Hicks; Justin Carrico; Evin U Jacobson; Ram K Shrestha; Timothy A Green; David W Purcell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.