Literature DB >> 29683690

Call to claim your prize: Perceived benefits and risk drive intention to comply in a mass marketing scam.

Stacey Wood1, Pi-Ju Liu2, Yaniv Hanoch3, Patricia M Xi4, Lukas Klapatch4.   

Abstract

Mass marketing scams extract an enormous toll, yet the literature on scams is just emerging. In Experiment 1, 211 adults reviewed a solicitation and rated their intention of contacting an "activation number" for a prize. Scarcity and authority were manipulated. Many (48.82%) indicated some willingness to contact to "activate" the winnings. Intention of responding was inversely related to the perception of risk (b = -.441, p < .001) and positively associated with perception of benefits (b = .554, p < .001), but not with the experimental condition. In Experiment 2, 291 adults were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions (low, medium, or high activation fee), and were asked to report willingness to contact. Activation fees decreased intent to contact, but percentages remained high (25.70%), with higher perception of risk reducing contact rates (b = -.581, p < .001), and benefit perception increasing intent to contact (b = .381, p < .001). Our studies indicate that consumers are responding to perceived risks and benefits in their decision-making, regardless of persuasion elements used by scammers. In summary, our studies find that consumers with lower levels of education and high perception of benefits are at increased risk for mass marketing scams. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29683690     DOI: 10.1037/xap0000167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  7 in total

1.  Financial Fraud Among Older Americans: Evidence and Implications.

Authors:  Marguerite DeLiema; Martha Deevy; Annamaria Lusardi; Olivia S Mitchell
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  The Phishing Email Suspicion Test (PEST) a lab-based task for evaluating the cognitive mechanisms of phishing detection.

Authors:  Ziad M Hakim; Natalie C Ebner; Daniela S Oliveira; Sarah J Getz; Bonnie E Levin; Tian Lin; Kaitlin Lloyd; Vicky T Lai; Matthew D Grilli; Robert C Wilson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10-19

3.  Email fraud: The search for psychological predictors of susceptibility.

Authors:  Helen S Jones; John N Towse; Nicholas Race; Timothy Harrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility on the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Brian S Cahill; Didem Pehlivanoglu; Tian Lin; Farha Deceus; Amber Heemskerk
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Susceptibility to COVID-19 Scams: The Roles of Age, Individual Difference Measures, and Scam-Related Perceptions.

Authors:  Julia Nolte; Yaniv Hanoch; Stacey Wood; David Hengerer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Integrating Individual Factors to Construct Recognition Models of Consumer Fraud Victimization.

Authors:  Liuchang Xu; Jie Wang; Dayu Xu; Liang Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Compliance with mass marketing solicitation: The role of verbatim and gist processing.

Authors:  Julia Nolte; Yaniv Hanoch; Stacey A Wood; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.