Literature DB >> 29683560

Hands-on or no hands-on training in ultrasound imaging: A randomized trial to evaluate learning outcomes and speed of recall of topographic anatomy.

Lars Knudsen1, Ralph Nawrotzki2, Andreas Schmiedl1, Christian Mühlfeld1, Carsten Kruschinski3, Matthias Ochs1.   

Abstract

Medical students have difficulties in interpreting two-dimensional (2D) topographic anatomy on sectional images. Hands-on and no hands-on training in ultrasound imaging facilitate learning topographic anatomy. Hands-on training is linked with active search for patterns of anatomical structures and might train pattern recognition for image interpretation better although the added value on learning outcomes is unclear. This study explores first year medical students' knowledge in topographic anatomy of the upper abdomen after attending hands-on or no hands-on training in ultrasound in a randomized trial. While students in the hands-on ultrasound group (N = 21) generated and interpreted standardized planes of ultrasound imaging, students in the no hands-on seminar group (N = 22) interpreted provided ultrasound images by correlation to three-dimensional (3D) anatomical prosections. Afterwards knowledge in topographic anatomy was measured repetitively by text and ultrasound image-based multiple choice (MC) examinations. As surrogate for pattern recognition, students rated whether answers were known after reflection or instantly. While intrinsic motivation was higher in the ultrasound group, no differences in the MC-examination score were found between ultrasound and seminar group instantly (66.5 ±10.9% vs. 64.5% ±11.0%, P = 0.551) or six weeks (62.9% ±12.3% vs. 61.5% ±11.0%, P = 0.718) after training. In both groups scores in text-based questions declined (P < 0.001) while scores in image-based questions remained stable (P = 0.895) with time. After six weeks more image-based questions were instantly known in the hands-on ultrasound compared to seminar-group (28% ±17.3% vs. 16% ±13.5%, P = 0.047). Hands-on ultrasound-training is linked with faster interpreting of ultrasound images without loss in accuracy. The added value of hands-on training might be facilitation of pattern recognition.
© 2018 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  cross-sectional anatomy; gross anatomy education; medical education; non-analytical reasoning; pattern recognition; topographic anatomy; ultrasound education

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29683560     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Evolution of Educational Technology in Veterinary Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Julien Guevar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Correlating Spatial Ability With Anatomy Assessment Performance: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victoria A Roach; Misa Mi; Jason Mussell; Sonya E Van Nuland; Rebecca S Lufler; Kathryn M DeVeau; Stacey M Dunham; Polly Husmann; Hannah L Herriott; Danielle N Edwards; Alison F Doubleday; Brittany M Wilson; Adam B Wilson
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 6.652

3.  Assessment of a Hands-On Seminar on Gastrointestinal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamada; Yuichi Hasegawa; Seiji Yamashiro; Michikazu Sekine; Yukihiro Asano; Haruka Fujinami
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07

4.  Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular torsion: a practical resident curriculum.

Authors:  Leandra Stringer; Sarah Cocco; Alex Jiang; Ernest Pang Chan; Frank Myslik; Gary Brahm; Hassan Razvi; Sumit Dave; Peter Zhan Tao Wang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Students Teaching Students: Student-Led Ultrasound Curriculum in Medical School Education.

Authors:  Michelle K Oberoi; Niresh C Perera; Josue Reynaga; Bo Ram Yoo; Christopher C Miller; Wesley Lockhart; Mo Entezampour; Lucas Friedman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-07

6.  Difference in postcourse knowledge and confidence between Web-based and on-site training courses on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Authors:  Hiraku Funakoshi; Yosuke Matsumura; Takaaki Maruhashi; Kenichiro Ishida; Tomohiro Funabiki
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2021-11-03

7.  Does ultrasound education improve anatomy learning? Effects of the Parallel Ultrasound Hands-on (PUSH) undergraduate medicine course.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Chen; Yi-No Kang; Ting-Cheng Wang; Che-Wei Lin; Chung-Yi Cheng; Fat-Moon Suk; Chin-Wang Hsu; Sha-Ku Huang; Wen-Cheng Huang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  First Year Medical Students, Personal Handheld Ultrasound Devices, and Introduction of Insonation in Medical Education.

Authors:  Mollie Ireson; Simrit Warring; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Maria T O'Malley; Wojciech Pawlina; Nirusha Lachman; Jagat Narula; Anjali Bhagra
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.462

9.  Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Robert M DePhilip; Melissa M Quinn
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.